US 2023/0145543 A1 · METHOD FOR STATIC IDENTIFICATION OF DAMAGE TO SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM UNDER UNCERTAIN LOAD

Abstract

The present disclosure provides a method for static identification of damage to a simply supported beam under an uncertain load. In this identification method, a beam body is first segmented, and the relationships between key measured sectional rotation angles and the flexural rigidities of segments of a structure under the action of a load are established by using a mechanics principle; then, an applied static load is removed by means of a division operation, and the relative relationships between the flexural rigidities of the segments of the structure are obtained; and finally, these relative relationships are compared with the corresponding relative relationships when the structure is not damaged, so as to determine the position of damage to the structure and assess the amount of damage, such that the static identification for damage to a simply supported beam structure can be completed without calibrating a load in advance.

A method for static identification of damage to a simply supported beam under an uncertain load, comprising:

step 1, applying a concentrated load to the simply supported beam by three-point bending, wherein the applied concentrated load is set to p1, and acts on a midspan of the beam structure;
step 2, dividing the beam structure into eight equal segments along a key section according to a span l, and assuming that the eight segments have particular flexural rigidities of EIr1,
1
k
2
E
I
r
1
,
1
k
3
E
I
r
1
,
1
k
4
E
I
r
1
,
1
k
5
E
I
r
1
,
1
k
6
E
I
r
1
,
1
k
7
E
I
r
1
and
1
k
8
E
I
r
1
,
respectively, wherein k2, k3, k4, k5, k6, k7 and k8 each denote a reciprocal of a ratio of the flexural rigidity of each of the second segment, the third segment, the fourth segment, the fifth segment, the sixth segment, the seventh segment and the eighth segment to the flexural rigidity of the first segment;
step 3, arranging a tilt angle sensor at a segment section of the beam structure and at sections of fulcrums at both ends of the beam structure, wherein the tilt angle sensor is used to measure a rotation angle at which the beam body rotates around a horizontal axis, a measured sectional rotation angle at the fulcrum close to the first segment is θ0, a measured sectional rotation angle between the first segment and the second segment is θ1, a measured sectional rotation angle between the second segment and the third segment is θ2, by analogy, a measured sectional rotation angle between the third segment and the fourth segment is θ3, a measured sectional rotation angle between the fourth segment and the fifth segment is θ4, a measured sectional rotation angle between the fifth segment and the sixth segment is θ5, a measured sectional rotation angle between the sixth segment and the seventh segment is θ6, a measured sectional rotation angle between the seventh segment and the eighth segment is θ7, and a measured sectional rotation angle at the fulcrum close to the eighth segment is θ8;
step 4, solving the following formula by substituting the foregoing measured sectional rotation angles θ0 - θ8 to obtain k2, k3, k4, k5, k6, k7 and k8:
k
2
=
1
3
θ
1
−
θ
2
θ
0
−
θ
1
;
k
3
=
1
5
θ
2
−
θ
3
θ
0
−
θ
1
;
k
4
=
1
7
θ
3
−
θ
4
θ
0
−
θ
1
;
k
5
=
1
7
θ
4
−
θ
5
θ
0
−
θ
1
;
k
6
=
1
5
θ
5
−
θ
6
θ
0
−
θ
1
;
k
7
=
1
3
θ
6
−
θ
7
θ
0
−
θ
1
;
k
8
=
θ
7
−
θ
8
θ
0
−
θ
1
;
step 5, establishing a finite element numerical model of the simply supported beam in a damage-free state under a concentrated load P2 acting on the midspan, extracting the corresponding measured sectional rotation angles in step 3 and setting the same as θ0d, θ1d, θ2d, θ3d, θ4d, θ5d, θ6d, θ7d and θ8d, and calculating, according to the following formula, theoretical values k2d, k3d, k4d, k5d, k6d, k7d and k8d of the structure in the damage-free state:
k
2
d
=
1
3
θ
1
d
−
θ
2
d
θ
0
d
−
θ
1
d
;
k
3
d
=
1
5
θ
2
d
−
θ
3
d
θ
0
d
−
θ
1
d
;
k
4
d
=
1
7
θ
3
d
−
θ
4
d
θ
0
d
−
θ
1
d
;
k
5
d
=
1
7
θ
4
d
−
θ
5
d
θ
0
d
−
θ
1
d
;
k
6
d
=
1
5
θ
5
d
−
θ
6
d
θ
0
d
−
θ
1
d
;
k
7
=
1
3
θ
6
d
−
θ
7
d
θ
0
d
−
θ
1
d
;
k
8
=
θ
7
d
−
θ
8
d
θ
0
d
−
θ
1
d
;
step 6, calculating, according to the following formula, a variation of the flexural rigidity of each segment with respect to the structure in the damage-free state:
Δ
2
=
1
k
2
−
1
k
2
d
/
1
k
2
d
×
100
%
;
Δ
3
=
1
k
3
−
1
k
3
d
/
1
k
3
d
×
100
%
;
Δ
4
=
1
k
4
−
1
k
4
d
/
1
k
4
d
×
100
%
;
Δ
5
=
1
k
5
−
1
k
5
d
/
1
k
5
d
×
100
%
;
Δ
6
=
1
k
6
−
1
k
6
d
/
1
k
6
d
×
100
%
;
Δ
7
=
1
k
7
−
1
k
7
d
/
1
k
7
d
×
100
%
;
Δ
8
=
1
k
8
−
1
k
8
d
/
1
k
8
d
×
100
%
;
;
wherein Δ2, Δ3, Δ4, Δ5, Δ6, Δ7 and Δ8 respectively denote variations of the flexural rigidities of the second segment, the third segment, the fourth segment, the fifth segment, the sixth segment, the seventh segment and the eighth segment with respect to the structure in the damage-free state;
and
step 7, solving following formulas to obtain amounts of damage D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7 and D8 of the first segment, the second segment, the third segment, the fourth segment, the fifth segment, the sixth segment, the seventh segment and the eighth segment, respectively:
D
1
=
max
Δ
2
,
Δ
3
,
Δ
4
,
Δ
5
,
Δ
6
,
Δ
7
,
Δ
8
;
D
2
=
Δ
2
−
D
1
;
D
3
=
Δ
3
−
D
1
;
D
4
=
Δ
4
−
D
1
;
D
5
=
Δ
5
−
D
1
;
D
6
=
Δ
6
−
D
1
;
D
7
=
Δ
7
−
D
1
;
D
8
=
Δ
8
−
D
1
.

548 more elements

Method for static identification of damage to simply supported beam under uncertain load

Life of this patent

Method for static identification of damage to simply supported beam under uncertain load

Life of this patent

Abstract

Claims3