State models for monitoring process
AssigneeSiebel Systems, Inc.
InventorsKaren Cheung Brodersen, Michael Tsunghsi Yu, Jai-Jein Yu, Andrzej P. Mazur, Brian K. Groves
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeSiebel Systems, Inc.
InventorsKaren Cheung Brodersen, Michael Tsunghsi Yu, Jai-Jein Yu, Andrzej P. Mazur, Brian K. Groves
Estimating the term…
System and method for preparing, using, and displaying a state model of a process, as an industrial or business process, as a sequence of discrete steps. The state model defines the behavior of the logical objects making up a process model of the process as (1) a set of permitted states and (2) a set of permitted transitions between the permitted states. The state model is created by selecting a template for the state model, and selecting industrial or business object components for the state model (for example, by using “OOP” methods or other programming paradigms). The user then selects or defines state transitions for the state model, for example, by defining permitted state transitions from a “from state” to a “to state”. The defined or selected state transition rules are identified to State Transition Rule names. That is, state transitions are associated to specific state transition rules, names, and conditions, and the state transition names and state transition rule names are enumerated. The specific state transition rules corresponding to the names are extracted from a database. The extracted states, transitions, and rules define the state machine execution engine. This state machine execution engine is used to process business models.
A method of preparing a state model defining the behavior of logical objects in a process model as a set of permitted states and a set of permitted transitions between the permitted states, and comprising the steps of:
A system running on at least one computer for preparing a state model defining the behavior of logical objects in a process as a set of permitted states and a set of permitted transitions between the permitted states, and said system configured to:
41 The system of claim 26 wherein the system is configured to monitor the state of deal as it moves from state to state.
The system of claim 41 wherein the system is configured to monitor the state of a deal to determine additional actions with respect to the deal.
The system of claim 41 wherein the system is configured to assign activity and assessment templates to a deal in process.
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.