Systems and methods for rotation based reconstruction for multi-column detector geometries
AssigneeGeneral Electric Company
InventorsJonathan Benjamin Sachs, Yariv Grobshtein
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeGeneral Electric Company
InventorsJonathan Benjamin Sachs, Yariv Grobshtein
Estimating the term…
A radiation detector system is provided that includes plural detector units and at least one processor. The detector units are configured to acquire imaging information at plural corresponding projection angles. The at least one processor is configured to acquire projections at the projection angles; organize the projections into groups based on the projection angles; and, for each group of projections, rotate a corresponding image from an original orientation so that the group of projections are parallel to a first axis of the rotated image, convolute and sum slices from the group of projections using kernels to provide a corresponding coordinate set forward projection; perform a back projection to provide back projections; and rotate the back projections to the original orientation and sum the rotated back projections to provide a back projected transaxial image.
A radiation detector system comprising:
A method comprising:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
No related US applications are recorded in the indexed filing history.
Measuring radiation intensity: circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular type of detector
Computed tomography [CT]: emission tomography
Characterised by using a particular type of detector: using matrix detectors
Related to the mounting of source units and detector units: the source unit and the detector unit being coupled by a rigid structure
About 10 years 8 months of term left · ends 30 Jun 2037 (estimated)
The subject matter disclosed herein relates generally to medical imaging systems, and more particularly to imaging systems having multi-column detector geometries or arrangements.
In nuclear medicine (NM) imaging, such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, radiopharmaceuticals are administered internally to a patient. Detectors (e.g., gamma cameras), typically installed on a gantry, capture the radiation emitted by the radiopharmaceuticals and this information is used, by a computer, to form images. The NM images primarily show physiological function of, for example, the patient or a portion of the patient being imaged.
Multi-column detector systems may be used to provide a relatively large number of different views of the object. Iterative reconstruction algorithms may be used, for example, to provide improved image quality and/or support non-conventional system geometries. However, iterative algorithms generally require substantially more calculations than other approaches, resulting in the requirement of relatively large computational resources and/or relatively long reconstruction times. In particular, forward projection and back projection operations may contribute substantially to the required computational resources and/or reconstruction times.
FIG. 1 provides a schematic view of a radiation detector assembly according to an embodiment.
FIG. 2 illustrates an example of an image at an original orientation.
FIG. 3 shows an example of the image of FIG. 2 in a rotated orientation.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of certain embodiments and claims, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. To the extent that the figures illustrate diagrams of the functional blocks of various embodiments, the functional blocks are not necessarily indicative of the division between hardware circuitry. Thus, for example, one or more of the functional blocks (e.g., processors, controllers or memories) may be implemented in a single piece of hardware (e.g., a general purpose signal processor or random access memory, hard disk, or the like) or multiple pieces of hardware. Similarly, the programs may be stand alone programs, may be incorporated as subroutines in an operating system, may be functions in an installed software package, and the like. It should be understood that the various embodiments are not limited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the drawings.
As used herein, the terms “system,” “unit,” or “module” may include a hardware and/or software system that operates to perform one or more functions. For example, a module, unit, or system may include a computer processor, controller, or other logic-based device that performs operations based on instructions stored on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a computer memory. Alternatively, a module, unit, or system may include a hard-wired device that performs operations based on hard-wired logic of the device. Various modules or units shown in the attached figures may represent the hardware that operates based on software or hardwired instructions, the software that directs hardware to perform the operations, or a combination thereof.
“Systems,” “units,” or “modules” may include or represent hardware and associated instructions (e.g., software stored on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a computer hard drive, ROM, RAM, or the like) that perform one or more operations described herein. The hardware may include electronic circuits that include and/or are connected to one or more logic-based devices, such as microprocessors, processors, controllers, or the like. These devices may be off-the-shelf devices that are appropriately programmed or instructed to perform operations described herein from the instructions described above. Additionally or alternatively, one or more of these devices may be hard-wired with logic circuits to perform these operations.