Neighborhood node mapping methods and apparatus for ingress mitigation in cable communication systems
AssigneeCetusView Technologies, LLC
InventorsSteven Nielsen, Ronald Totten, Travis Halky
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeCetusView Technologies, LLC
InventorsSteven Nielsen, Ronald Totten, Travis Halky
Estimating the term…
A mobile transmitter traverses a drive path in a neighborhood node of a cable communication system and broadcasts a test signal at frequencies falling within an upstream path bandwidth. A navigational device generates a first record of positions of the transmitter along the drive path, and an analyzer monitors the upstream path bandwidth and generates a second record of received signal amplitudes of the transmitted test signal as a function of time. An ingress map is generated showing the drive path and potential points of ingress in the node, and employed to remediate faults particularly in the hardline coaxial cable plant. Iterative generation of maps and corresponding remediation in the node enable improved cable communication systems with reduced noise profiles between 5 MHz and 20 MHz and employing higher modulation order QAM communication channels (e.g., 256-QAM and higher) throughout the upstream path bandwidth to increase upstream capacity.
A method for facilitating detection of ingress in at least one neighborhood node of a cable communication system, the cable communication system comprising:
An apparatus for facilitating detection of ingress in at least a first neighborhood node of a cable communication system, the apparatus comprising:
A computer readable non-transitory storage medium storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, perform a method for facilitating detection of ingress in at least a first neighborhood node of a cable communication system, the method comprising:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
Line transmission systems: systems for transmission between fixed stations via two-conductor transmission lines
Line transmission systems: details
Details: monitoring; Testing
Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing…
About 6 years 1 month of term left · ends 25 Nov 2032 (estimated)
Cable communication systems provide one or more of commercial TV services, Internet data services, and voice services (e.g., “Voice-over-Internet Protocol,” or VoIP) to one or more subscriber premises (or “end users”) in a given geographic area. Generally speaking, a cable communication system refers to the operational (e.g., geographical) footprint of an entertainment and/or information services franchise that provides entertainment and/or information services to a subscriber base spanning one or more towns, a metropolitan area, or a portion thereof. Particular entertainment and/or information services offered by the franchise (e.g., entertainment channel lineup, data packages, etc.) may differ from system to system. Some large cable companies operate several cable communication systems (e.g., in some cases up to hundreds of systems), and are known generally as Multiple System Operators (MSOs).
Cable Communication System Overview
FIG. 1 generally illustrates various elements of a conventional hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) cable communication system 160. The cable communication system 160 includes a headend 162 coupled to one or more nodes 164A, 164B and 164C via one or more physical communication media. The physical communication media typically include fiber optic cable and coaxial cable to convey information (e.g., television programming, Internet data, voice services) between the headend 162 and subscriber premises served by the nodes 164A, 164B and 164C of the cable communication system 160.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings primarily are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; in some instances, various aspects of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may be shown exaggerated or enlarged in the drawings to facilitate an understanding of different features. In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to like features (e.g., functionally similar and/or structurally similar elements).
FIG. 1 illustrates various aspects of a conventional cable communication system.
Following below are more detailed descriptions of various concepts related to, and embodiments of, inventive methods and apparatus for ingress mitigation in cable communication systems, and cable communication systems and methods having increased upstream capacity for supporting voice and/or data services. It should be appreciated that various concepts introduced above and discussed in greater detail below may be implemented in any of numerous ways, as the disclosed concepts are not limited to any particular manner of implementation. Examples of specific implementations and applications are provided primarily for illustrative purposes.
I. System Overview to Demonstrate Efficacy
To demonstrate the various concepts disclosed herein, ingress mitigation methods and apparatus according to embodiments of the present invention were employed in a functioning cable communication system similar to that shown in FIGS. 1 through 4, having multiple neighborhood nodes respectively serving numerous subscriber premises. Noise profiles of the upstream path bandwidth in multiple different neighborhood nodes of this cable communication system first were studied so as to collect general baseline information (e.g., 24 hour average spectrums for the upstream path bandwidth were acquired for each of the neighborhood nodes to obtain representative noise power spectrums), and one neighborhood node with a noteworthy noise profile showing a significant presence of ingress particularly between 5 MHz and 20 MHz was chosen in which to implement ingress mitigation methods as outlined in greater detail below (this neighborhood node is referred to herein as the “ingress mitigated node”). Four other nodes of the cable communication system, all demonstrating appreciable ingress, served as “control nodes” in which no ingress mitigation was performed, so as to provide a system-wide comparative basis for illustrating the efficacy of the ingress mitigation methodology.