Back to results
US 8,620,419 B2Granted
Multi purpose criteria based adaptive training system
AssigneeLockheed Martin Corporation
InventorsEdward Rotenberg, Patrice D. Tremoulet, Randel A. Crowe, Ruthann Savage-King, Patrick Craven, Steven J. Tourville
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Abstract
A system and method include a computer implemented training framework that adapts its behavior to different types of training goals. The system utilizes a measured neuro-physiological state of a student to provide at least one of self regulation feedback and training environment feedback to optimize a learning experience for one or more different types of scenarios.
Claims17
A sensor system comprising:
- a sensor input to couple to an electroencephalograph sensor to detect a neuro-physiological state of a student;
- a configurator input to receive information regarding training objective functions and to modify control algorithms and system parameters in accordance with a selected training objective function;
- and
- a controller coupled to the sensor input to implement the control algorithms and provide a communication if the student is outside a desired neuro-physiological state consistent with a desired learning zone and to provide a lesson intensity control signal as a function of the provided communication, sensed neuro-physiological state and selected training objective function;
- a converter to convert the sensed neuro-physiological state of the student to cognitive parameters that are representative of cognitive workload, level of engagement, and alertness and wherein the lesson intensity is regulated using proportional integral control as a function of workload calculated from the sensed neuro-physiological state;
- wherein the controller calculates the cognitive workload as a function of the amplitudes of the electroencephalograph signal at multiple electroencephalograph signal frequencies;
- and
- wherein the electroencephalograph signal frequencies include:
- α corresponding to a range 8-12 Hz, β corresponding to a range of 12-30 Hz, γ corresponding to a range of 30-100 Hz, θ corresponding to a range of 4-7 Hz and δ corresponding to a range 0-4 Hz, and wherein the controller is configured to calculate workload, W(t), at time, t, according to the following formula:
- W
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- =
- k
- 1
-
- α
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 2
-
- β
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 3
-
- γ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 4
-
- θ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 4
-
- δ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 5
-
- α
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- θ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 6
-
- γ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- α
-
- (
- t
- )
- ,
- n
- =
- 0
- ,
- 1
- ,
- 2
- ,
- …
-
-
- m
-
- W
-
- (
- t
- )
- =
- ∑
- i
- =
- 0
- m
-
- r
- i
-
- W
-
- (
- t
- -
- i
- )
- where ki are conversion coefficients for different frequencies α(t), β(t), γ(t), θ(t), δ(t) and ri are coefficients.
139 more elements
A system comprising:
- a sensor input to receive biosignals representative of a neuro-physiological state of a student;
- a converter coupled to the sensor input to receive the biosignals and to convert the biosignals to learning zone digital values;
- a training environment for the student responsive to lesson intensity values;
- a configurator to receive input regarding training objective functions and to modify control algorithms in accordance with the training objective functions;
- and
- a controller coupled to the converter to receive the learning zone digital values and to provide a communication to the student if the learning zone digital values are indicative of the student being outside a desired neuro-physiological state consistent with the control algorithms and to modify the training environment as a function of the control algorithms and sensed neuro-physiological state;
- a converter to convert the sensed neuro-physiological state of the student to cognitive parameters that are representative of cognitive workload, level of engagement, and alertness and wherein the lesson intensity is regulated using proportional integral control as a function of workload calculated from the sensed neuro-physiological state;
- wherein the controller calculates the cognitive workload as a function of amplitudes of the electroencephalograph signal at multiple electroencephalograph signal frequencies;
- and
- wherein the electroencephalograph signal frequencies include:
- α corresponding to a range 8-12 Hz, β corresponding to a range of 12-30 Hz, γ corresponding to a range of 30-100 Hz, θ corresponding to a range of 4-7 Hz and δ corresponding to a range 0-4 Hz, and wherein the controller is configured to calculate workload, W(t), at a time, t, according to the following formula:
- W
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- =
- k
- 1
-
- α
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 2
-
- β
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 3
-
- γ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 4
-
- θ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 4
-
- δ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 5
-
- α
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- θ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 6
-
- γ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- α
-
- (
- t
- )
- ,
- n
- =
- 0
- ,
- 1
- ,
- 2
- ,
- …
-
-
- m
-
- W
-
- (
- t
- )
- =
- ∑
- i
- =
- 0
- m
-
- r
- i
-
- W
-
- (
- t
- -
- i
- )
- where ki are conversion coefficients for different frequencies α(t), β(t), γ(t), θ(t), δ(t) and ri are coefficients.
141 more elements
A computer implemented method comprising:
- configuring a controller executing on a computer system with control algorithms, stored on a computer readable storage device, as a function of a selected objective function and training scenario;
- receiving biosignals to produce received biosignals representative of a neuro-physiological state of a student;
- determining via the computer system, a current neuro-physiological state from the received biosignals;
- modifying, via the computer system, a training environment as a function of the current neuro-physiological state of the student based on the control algorithms;
- and
- converting the sensed neuro-physiological state of the student to cognitive parameters that are representative of cognitive workload, level of engagement, and alertness and wherein the lesson intensity is regulated using proportional integral control as a function of the cognitive workload calculated from the sensed neuro-physiological state;
- wherein the cognitive workload is calculated as a function of amplitudes of the electroencephalograph signal at multiple electroencephalograph signal frequencies;
- and
- wherein the electroencephalograph signal frequencies include:
- α corresponding to a range 8-12 Hz, β corresponding to a range of 12-30 Hz, γ corresponding to a range of 30-100 Hz, θ corresponding to a range of 4-7 Hz and δ corresponding to a range 0-4 Hz, and wherein the controller is configured to calculate workload, W(t), at a time, t, according to the following formula:
- W
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- =
- k
- 1
-
- α
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 2
-
- β
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 3
-
- γ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 4
-
- θ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 4
-
- δ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 5
-
- α
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- θ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- +
- k
- 6
-
- γ
-
- (
- t
- -
- n
- )
- α
-
- (
- t
- )
- ,
- n
- =
- 0
- ,
- 1
- ,
- 2
- ,
- …
-
-
- m
-
- W
-
- (
- t
- )
- =
- ∑
- i
- =
- 0
- m
-
- r
- i
-
- W
-
- (
- t
- -
- i
- )
- where ki are conversion coefficients for different frequencies α(t), β(t), γ(t), θ(t), δ(t) and ri are coefficients.
140 more elements
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.