# US 8,540,024 B2 · Perforation strategy for heterogeneous proppant placement in hydraulic fracturing > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 8,540,024 B2 - Document ID: US8540024B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 12/667,073 - Filed: 2007-07-03 - Published: 2011-02-17 - Granted: 2013-09-24 - Earliest claimed: 2007-07-03 - Assignees: Schlumberger Technology Corporation - Applicants: Ivan Vitalievich Kosarev; Oleg Olegovich Medvedev; Anatoly Vladimirovich Medvedev; Ian Walton - Inventors: Ivan Vitalievich Kosarev; Oleg Olegovich Medvedev; Anatoly Vladimirovich Medvedev; Ian Walton - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US8540024B2 ## CPC - E21B 43/267: reinforcing fractures by propping - E21B 43/11: Perforators; Permeators - E21B: EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS ## Abstract Hydraulic fracturing an individual reservoir fracturing layer of a subterranean formation to produce heterogeneous proppant placement is given in which pillars of proppant are placed such that the pillars do not extend the entire height of the fracture (for a vertical fracture) but are themselves interrupted by channels so that the channels between the pillars form pathways that lead to the wellbore. The method combines methods of introducing slugs of proppant-carrying and proppant-free fluids through multiple clusters of perforations within a single fracturing layer of rock, with methods of ensuring that the slugs exiting the individual clusters do not merge. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method for heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture in a fracturing layer penetrated by a wellbore, the method comprising a slugging step comprising injecting alternating slugs of thickened proppant-free fluid and proppant-carrying thickened fluid into the fracturing layer above fracturing pressure through a plurality of clusters of perforations in the fracturing layer, wherein the slugs of proppant-carrying thickened fluid form pillars of proppant upon fracture closure. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the parameters slug volume, slug composition, proppant size, proppant concentration, number of holes per cluster, perforation cluster length, perforation cluster separation, perforation cluster orientation, and perforation cluster shot density, lengths of perforation channels, methods of perforation, the presence or concentration of reinforcing material, and the presence or concentration of proppant transport material alternates along the wellbore in the fracturing layer. ### Claim 3 A method for heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture in a fracturing layer, the method comprising: a) a slugging step comprising injecting alternating slugs of thickened proppant-free fluid and proppant-carrying thickened fluid into the fracturing layer above fracturing pressure through a plurality of clusters of perforations in a wellbore in the fracturing layer, and b) causing the sequences of slugs of thickened proppant-free fluid and proppant-carrying thickened fluid injected through neighboring clusters to move through the fracture at different rates, wherein the slugs of proppant-carrying thickened fluid form pillars of proppant upon fracture closure. ### Claim 4 A method for heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture in a fracturing layer comprising: a) a slugging step comprising injecting alternating slugs of thickened proppant-free fluid and proppant-carrying thickened fluid into the fracturing layer above fracturing pressure through a plurality of clusters of perforations in a wellbore in the fracturing layer, and b) causing the sequences of slugs of proppant-carrying thickened fluid injected through at least one pair of clusters to be separated by injected proppant-free fluid, wherein the slugs of proppant-carrying thickened fluid form pillars of proppant upon fracture closure. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein some or all of the slugs in the slugging step comprise a reinforcing material. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) The method of claim 5 wherein the reinforcing material comprises organic, inorganic, or both organic and inorganic fibers, optionally with an adhesive coating alone or with an adhesive coating coated by a layer of non-adhesive substance dissolvable in the thickened fluid during its passage through the fracture; metallic particles of spherical or elongated shape; and plates, ribbons, and discs of organic or inorganic substances, ceramics, metals or metal alloys. ### Claim 7 (depends on 5) The method of claim 5 wherein the reinforcing material is included only in the proppant-carrying thickened fluid slugs. ### Claim 8 (depends on 5) The method of claim 5 wherein the reinforcing material elongated particles at least 2 mm long and having a diameter of from 3 to 200 microns. ### Claim 9 (depends on 5) The method of claim 5 wherein the proppant transport material comprises fibers at least 2 mm long and having a diameter of from 3 to 200 microns. ### Claim 10 (depends on 5) The method of claim 5 wherein the weight concentration of the reinforcing material or the proppant transport material in any slug is from 0.1 to 10%. ### Claim 11 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein some or all of the slugs in the slugging step further comprise a proppant transport material. ### Claim 12 (depends on 11) The method of claim 11 wherein the proppant transport material comprises a material comprising elongated particles having the ratio between their length and another dimension greater than 5 to 1. ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12 wherein the proppant transport material is included only in the proppant-carrying thickened fluid slugs. ### Claim 14 (depends on 11) The method of claim 11 wherein the proppant transport material comprises fibers made from synthetic or naturally occurring organic materials, or glass, ceramic, carbon, or metal. ### Claim 15 (depends on 11) The method of claim 11 wherein proppant transport material comprises a material that becomes adhesive at formation temperatures. ### Claim 16 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15 wherein the proppant transport material is further coated by a non-adhesive material that dissolves in the thickened fluid as it passes through the fracture. ### Claim 17 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the volume of the proppant-carrying thickened fluid is less than the volume of the thickened proppant-free fluid. ### Claim 18 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the proppant comprises a mixture of proppant selected to minimize the resulting porosity of the proppant slugs in the fracture. ### Claim 19 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the proppant particles have a resinous or adhesive coating alone, or a resinous or adhesive coating coated by a layer of non-adhesive substance dissolvable in the fracturing fluid as it passes through the fracture. ### Claim 20 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 further comprising a tail-in-stage at an end of elements a) and b) comprising continuous introduction of proppant-carrying thickened fluid into the fracturing fluid, the proppant having an essentially uniform particle size. ### Claim 21 (depends on 20) The method of claim 20, wherein the proppant-carrying thickened fluid in the tail-in-stage further comprises a reinforcing material, a proppant transport material, or both. ### Claim 22 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the fluids are thickened with a polymer or with a viscoelastic surfactant. ### Claim 23 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the number of holes in each cluster are not the same. ### Claim 24 (depends on 23) The method of claim 23 wherein the orientations of the perforations in all the clusters relative to a preferred fracture plane are not the same. ### Claim 25 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the diameter of holes in all clusters are not the same. ### Claim 26 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the lengths of the perforation channels in all clusters are not the same. ### Claim 27 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein at least two different methods of perforating clusters are used. ### Claim 28 (depends on 27) The method of claim 27 wherein some of the clusters are produced using an underbalanced perforation technique. ### Claim 29 (depends on 27) The method of claim 27 wherein at least some of the clusters are produced using an overbalanced perforation technique. ### Claim 30 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein at least two clusters of perforations allow flow of a sequence of slugs of thickened proppant-free fluid and proppant-carrying thickened fluid are separated by a cluster of perforations having sufficiently small perforations that the proppant bridges and proppant-free fluid or substantially proppant-free fluid enters the formation through that cluster. ### Claim 31 (depends on 30) The method of claim 30 wherein every pair of perforations that produce a sequence of slugs of thickened proppant-free fluid and proppant-carrying thickened fluid are separated by a cluster of perforations having sufficiently small perforations that the proppant bridges and proppant-free fluid or substantially proppant-free fluid enters the formation through that cluster. ### Claim 32 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the number of perforation clusters is between 2 and 300. ### Claim 33 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the number of perforation clusters is between 2 and 100. ### Claim 34 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the perforation cluster length is between 0.15 m and 3.0 m. ### Claim 35 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the perforation cluster separation is from 0.30 m to 30 m. ### Claim 36 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the perforation shot density is from 1 to 30 shots per 0.3 m. ### Claim 37 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein a fluid injection design is determined from a mathematical model. ### Claim 38 (depends on 37) The method of claim 37 wherein the fluid injection design includes a correction for slug dispersion. ### Claim 39 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein a perforation cluster design is determined from a mathematical model. ### Claim 40 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein at least one of the parameters slug volume, slug composition, proppant size, proppant concentration, number of holes per cluster, perforation cluster length, perforation cluster separation, perforation cluster orientation, and perforation cluster shot density, lengths of perforation channels, methods of perforation, the presence or concentration of reinforcing material, and the presence or concentration of proppant transport material is constant along the wellbore in the fracturing layer. ### Claim 41 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein at least one of the parameters slug volume, slug composition, proppant size, proppant concentration, number of holes per cluster, perforation cluster length, perforation cluster separation, perforation cluster orientation, and perforation cluster shot density, lengths of perforation channels, methods of perforation, the presence or concentration of reinforcing material, and the presence or concentration of proppant transport material increases or decreases along the wellbore in the fracturing layer. ### Claim 42 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein pillars of proppant are formed and placed such that the pillars do not extend an entire dimension of the fracture parallel to the wellbore but are themselves interrupted by channels so that the channels between the pillars form pathways that lead to the wellbore. ### Claim 43 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the proppant slugs have a volume between 80 and 16,000 liters. ### Claim 44 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4 wherein the perforations are slots cut into tubing lining the wellbore.