Audio frequency response processing system
AssigneeDolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
InventorDavid Stanley McGrath
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeDolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
InventorDavid Stanley McGrath
Estimating the term…
The invention provides a method and system for forming an output impulse response function. The method includes the steps of creating an initial impulse response, and dividing the impulse response into a head portion and a tail portion. The tail portion is high pass filtered, and low frequency components of the head portion are boosted. The low frequency boosted and high pass filtered respective head and tail portions are then combined into a modified output impulse response, which can then be used to spatialize an audio signal by convolving it.
An audio processing system for spatializing an audio signal, said system comprising:
A method of processing an audio input signal comprising the steps of:
A method of spatializing an audio signal comprising the steps of:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field: electronic adaptation of stereophonic audio signals to reverberation of the…
Two-channel systems: non-adaptive circuits, e.g. manually adjustable or static, for enhancing the sound image or the spatial distribution
Stereophonic systems
Term ended 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
This present invention relates to the field of audio signal processing and, in particular, to the field of simulating impulse response functions so as to provide for spatialization of audio signals.
The human auditory system has evolved accurately to locate sounds that occur within the environment of the listener. The accuracy is thought to be derived primarily from two calculations carried out by the brain. The first is an analysis of the initial sound arrival and arrival of near reflections (the direct sound or head portion of the sound) which normally help to locate a sound; the second is an analysis of the reverberant tail portion of a sound which helps to provide an “environmental feel” to the sound. Of course, subtle differences between the sounds received at each ear are also highly relevant, especially upon the receipt of the direct sound and early reflections.
For example, in FIG. 1, there is illustrated a speaker 1 and listener 2 in a room environment. Taking the case of a single ear 3, the listener 2 receives a direct sound 4 from the speaker and a number of reflections 5, 6, and 7. It will be noted that the arrangement of FIG. 1 essentially shows a two dimensional sectional view and reflections off the floors or the ceilings are not shown. Further, the audio signal to only one ear is illustrated.
Notwithstanding any other forms which may fall in the scope of the present invention, the preferred forms of the invention will now be described by way of the example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which;
FIG. 1 illustrates schematically the process of projection of a sound to a listener in a room environment;
FIG. 2 illustrates a typical impulse response of a room;
Research by the present inventor into the nature of measured impulse response functions has lead to various unexpected discoveries which can be utilised to advantageous effect in reducing the computational complexity of the convolution process in audio spatialization. From various measurements made by the present inventor of human listeners to audio spatialization systems the following important factors have been uncovered.
First, the low frequency components in the tail of an impulse response do not contribute to the sense of an enveloping acoustic space. Generally, this sense of “space” is created by the high frequency (greater than around 300 Hz) portion of the reverberant tail of the room impulse response.
Secondly, the low-frequency part of the tail of the reverberant response is often the cause of undesirable ‘resonance’ effects, particularly if the reverberant room response includes the modal resonances that are present in almost all rooms. This is often perceived by the listener as “bad equalisation”.