System and method for correct routing and enforcement policy in a network having address or port translation
AssigneeGenband US LLC
InventorsAnthony MacDonald, Brian Stucker
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeGenband US LLC
InventorsAnthony MacDonald, Brian Stucker
Estimating the term…
The present invention incorporates an intermediary proxy rules device that has access to information regarding network address and port bindings or network address and port translations. This intermediary function communicates translated address information to other devices on the network, such as the policy and charging rule function and policy and charging enforcement function. The full communication and coordination of this information coordinates correct translation address information and other necessary information to these PCRF and PCEF devices, which eliminates many of the problems associated with the session set-up and maintenance with other networks.
A system for supporting the transmission of multimedia communications, comprising:
A system for supporting multimedia communications on a network, comprising:
A method for providing support for multimedia communications on a network, comprising the steps of:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Translation of Internet protocol [IP] addresses: identification of devices behind NAT devices
Details: charging, metering or billing arrangements specially adapted for data communications, e.g. authentication, authorisation and accounting…
Charging, metering or billing arrangements specially adapted for data communications, e.g. authentication, authorisation and accounting [AAA]…:…
Architectures or entities: iP multimedia subsystem [IMS]
About 2 years 2 months of term left · ends 29 Dec 2028 (estimated)
A method for correctly applying policy within a multimedia communications network in the presence of network address or port translation.
Present-day Internet communications represent the synthesis of technical developments begun in the 1960s. During that time period, the Defense Department developed a communication system to support communication between different United States military computer networks, and later a similar system was used to support communication between different research computer networks at United States universities.
The Internet
The objects and features of the invention will become more readily understood from the following detailed description and appended claims when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like elements and in which:
FIG. 1 is a prior art schematic diagram of a communication network; and,
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a communication network;
FIG. 1 shows an exemplary embodiment for an IP multimedia communication where the user equipment (UE) 100 is coupled to the session border controller (SBC) 125 by the SIP communication link 112. The SBC 125 has an SIP Proxy ALG 117 and a Media Proxy 120.
The SIP Proxy ALG 117 includes a network address translation device, and the SIP Proxy ALG 117 is coupled by link 146 to the Proxy Call Session Control Function (PCSCF) 135 for a network that supports the multimedia communications support servers and IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS Core) 155. The PCSCF 135 is coupled to the IMS Core 155 by communication link 145. Translated addresses are provided to the PCSCF 135 by the session border controller [125], and these translated addresses are used by PCSCF 135 to communicate to other devices.
The user equipment (UE) 100 is also coupled to the Policy Control and Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF) 160 via link 161, and the Policy Control and Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF) 160 is coupled to the Policy Control and Charging Rules Function (PCRF) 175 through a Diameter Rx/Gx communication link 171. The PCEF 160 recognizes the mobile node's actual source address, but the PCEF 160 is not provided with a correlation of the mobile node's actual source address versus the translated address for the mobile node as translated by the SBC 125.