Tissue penetration device
AssigneePelikan Technologies, Inc.
InventorsDominique Freeman, Dirk Boecker, Don Alden, Barry Dean Briggs, Jon Hewitt Leonard, Ray Freeman, George Gogue
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneePelikan Technologies, Inc.
InventorsDominique Freeman, Dirk Boecker, Don Alden, Barry Dean Briggs, Jon Hewitt Leonard, Ray Freeman, George Gogue
Estimating the term…
In one embodiment of the present invention a lancet is provided that has a sharpened distal tip, a shaft portion and a proximal drive head. The proximal drive head has a transverse dimension that is substantially larger than a transverse dimension of the shaft portion adjacent to the proximal drive head.
A lancet module comprising
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Devices for bringing media into the body in a subcutaneous, intra-vascular or intramuscular way; Accessories therefor, e.g. filling or cleaning…:…
Source of blood: for capillary blood or interstitial fluid
For enhanced collection of blood or interstitial fluid at the sample site, e.g. by applying compression, heat, vibration, ultrasound, suction or…:…
Means for enhancing collection: by tissue compression, e.g. with specially designed surface of device contacting the skin area to be pierced
Term ended 27 May 2024 (estimated)
Lancing devices are known in the medical health-care products industry for piercing the skin to produce blood for analysis. Biochemical analysis of blood samples is a diagnostic tool for determining clinical information. Many point-of-care tests are performed using whole blood, the most common being monitoring diabetic blood glucose level. Other uses for this method include the analysis of oxygen and coagulation based on Prothrombin time measurement. Typically, a drop of blood for this type of analysis is obtained by making a small incision in the fingertip, creating a small wound, which generates a small blood droplet on the surface of the skin.
Early methods of lancing included piercing or slicing the skin with a needle or razor. Current methods utilize lancing devices that contain a multitude of spring, cam and mass actuators to drive the lancet. These include cantilever springs, diaphragms, coil springs, as well as gravity plumbs used to drive the lancet. Typically, the device is pre-cocked or the user cocks the device. The device is held against the skin and the user, or pressure from the users skin, mechanically triggers the ballistic launch of the lancet. The forward movement and depth of skin penetration of the lancet is determined by a mechanical stop and/or dampening, as well as a spring or cam to retract the lancet. Such devices have the possibility of multiple strikes due to recoil, in addition to vibratory stimulation of the skin as the driver impacts the end of the launcher stop, and only allow for rough control for skin thickness variation. Different skin thickness may yield different results in terms of pain perception, blood yield and success rate of obtaining blood between different users of the lancing device.
Success rate generally encompasses the probability of producing a blood sample with one lancing action, which is sufficient in volume to perform the desired analytical test. The blood may appear spontaneously at the surface of the skin, or may be “milked” from the wound. Milking generally involves pressing the side of the digit, or in proximity of the wound to express the blood to the surface. The blood droplet produced by the lancing action must reach the surface of the skin to be viable for testing. For a one-step lance and blood sample acquisition method, spontaneous blood droplet formation is requisite. Then it is possible to interface the test strip with the lancing process for metabolite testing.
FIGS. 1-3 are graphs of lancet velocity versus position for embodiments of spring driven, cam driven, and controllable force drivers.
FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of a controllable force driver in the form of a flat electric lancet driver that has a solenoid-type configuration.
FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of a controllable force driver in the form of a cylindrical electric lancet driver using a coiled solenoid-type configuration.
Variations in skin thickness including the stratum corneum and hydration of the epidermis can yield different results between different users with existing tissue penetration devices, such as lancing devices wherein the tissue penetrating element of the tissue penetration device is a lancet. Many current devices rely on adjustable mechanical stops or damping, to control the lancet's depth of penetration.
Displacement velocity profiles for both spring driven and cam driven tissue penetration devices are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, respectively. Velocity is plotted against displacement X of the lancet. FIG. 1 represents a displacement/velocity profile typical of spring driven devices. The lancet exit velocity increases until the lancet hits the surface of the skin 10. Because of the tensile characteristics of the skin, it will bend or deform until the lancet tip cuts the surface 20, the lancet will then penetrate the skin until it reaches a full stop 30. At this point displacement is maximal and reaches a limit of penetration and the lancet stops. Mechanical stops absorb excess energy from the driver and transfer it to the lancet. The energy stored in the spring can cause recoil resulting in multiple piercing as seen by the coiled profile in FIG. 1. This results in unnecessary pain from the additional tissue penetration as well as from transferring vibratory energy into the skin and exciting nerve endings. Retraction of the lancet then occurs and the lancet exits the skin 40 to return into the housing. Velocity cannot be controlled in any meaningful way for this type of spring-powered driver.
FIG. 2 shows a displacement/velocity profile for a cam driven driver, which is similar to that of FIG. 1, but because the return path is specified in the cam configuration, there is no possibility of multiple tissue penetrations from one actuation. Cam based drivers can offer some level of control of lancet velocity vs. displacement, but not enough to achieve many desirable displacement/velocity profiles.