# US 7,411,771 B2 · Electric circuit arrangement for controlling a solenoid-operated fluid valve

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 7,411,771 B2
- Document ID: US7411771B2
- Status: Granted
- Kind: B2
- Application number: 10/583,478
- Filed: 2004-10-07
- Published: 2007-06-28
- Granted: 2008-08-12
- Earliest claimed: 2003-12-19
- Assignees: Bosch Rexroth AG
- Inventors: Karlheinz Panzer; Richard Knüttel; Alexander Meisselbach
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US7411771B2

## CPC

- F16K 31/0675: {Electromagnet aspects, e.g. electric supply therefor}
- H01F 7/1844: {Monitoring or fail-safe circuits (for relays H01H47/002)}
- F16K: VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING {(devices for emptying and evacuating the excess liquid in valves or conduits F16L55/07)}
- H01F: MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES

## Abstract

An electric circuit arrangement for controlling a solenoid-operated fluid valve.

## Claims

### Claim 1

An electric circuit arrangement for controlling a solenoid-operated fluid valve, comprising:
a solenoid coil;
connecting lines; and
an amplifier circuit including an input stage and an output stage, the amplifier converting a voltage supplied to the input stage into a current of a corresponding magnitude, the current flowing from the output stage via the connecting lines to the solenoid coil;
a monitoring circuit including a current-measuring device for the current, wherein:
the monitoring circuit is supplied with a setpoint voltage determining a magnitude of the current,
the monitoring circuit continuously reduces the voltage supplied to the input stage starting from the setpoint voltage if a time average of the current has exceeded an upper threshold value,
the monitoring circuit interrupts a connecting line leading to the solenoid coil if the time average has not fallen again below the upper threshold value after a specifiable time, and
the monitoring circuit increases the voltage supplied to the input stage again to the setpoint voltage after the time average of the current has fallen below the upper threshold value.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The electric circuit arrangement as recited in claim 1, further comprising:
a first comparator that compares the time average of the output signal of the current-measuring device to an upper threshold value, wherein:
the first comparator includes an integration element connected thereto in an outgoing circuit, an output voltage of which is limitable in such a way that it does not exceed an upper value,
the output voltage of the integration element decreases for as long as the time average of the current exceeds the upper threshold value, and
the output voltage of the integration element increases for as long as the time average of the current is less than the upper threshold value,
the output voltage of the integration element and the setpoint voltage are supplied to a minimum value selection element, and
the smaller of the two voltages of the input stage is supplied to the amplifier circuit.

### Claim 3 (depends on 2)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 2, wherein the upper value is limitable to the output voltage of the integration element, at least equal to the maximum setpoint voltage.

### Claim 4 (depends on 2)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 2, wherein the time average of the current is supplied to the comparator via a time-delay element.

### Claim 5 (depends on 2)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 2, further comprising:
an absolute-value generator connected between the current-measuring device and the comparator.

### Claim 6 (depends on 2)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 2, further comprising:
a second comparator; and
a first relay including a first switching contact, wherein:
the output voltage of the integration element and a voltage corresponding to a lower threshold value are supplied to inputs of the second comparator, and
the second comparator controls the relay, and
the switching contact interrupts a connecting line if the output voltage of the integration element has become smaller than the lower threshold value.

### Claim 7 (depends on 6)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 6, further comprising:
a second relay including a second switching contact, wherein:
the second comparator controls the second relay, and
the second switching contact interrupts another connecting line if the output voltage of the integration element has become smaller than the lower threshold value.

### Claim 8 (depends on 7)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 7, further comprising:
a bistable switch situated between the second comparator and one of the first relay and the second relay, wherein:
the second comparator switches the bistable switch from a first position into a second position if the output voltage of the integration element (35) has become smaller than the lower threshold value, and
the bistable switch in the first position is reset by a separate reset signal.

### Claim 9 (depends on 8)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 8, wherein the second comparator and the bistable switch are configured as a third comparator having a self-holding mechanism.

### Claim 10 (depends on 6)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 6, further comprising:
an amplifier circuit for controlling two solenoid coils, the amplifier circuit controlling one of the solenoid coils in the case of a positive setpoint voltage and another of the solenoid coils in the case of a negative setpoint voltage;
a minimum value selection element for preserving a sign of the setpoint voltage, selecting a smaller value in terms of absolute value, and supplying it to the amplifier circuit as an input voltage;
a computing element for forming a sum of the voltages corresponding to the currents flowing across the solenoid lines, wherein a sum signal corresponding to the sum is supplied to the first comparator.

### Claim 11 (depends on 10)

The circuit arrangement as recited in claim 10, further comprising:
two relays controlled by the second comparator, wherein each relay in each instance interrupts one of the connecting lines leading to the solenoid coils if the output voltage of the integration element has become smaller than the lower threshold value.