Micromechanical optical switch
AssigneeCorning Incorporated
InventorsSandeep Akkaraju, Carlos Mastrangelo, Nan Iyer
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeCorning Incorporated
InventorsSandeep Akkaraju, Carlos Mastrangelo, Nan Iyer
Estimating the term…
The present invention relates to optical MEMS components, and in particular, to a micromechanical optical switch. A removable layer is used during fabrication to define the gap between optical waveguides and a moveable element in the form of a mirror that is moved between states. This provides a high speed, low-power optical switch that is readily manufacturable.
An optical switch comprising:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Mechanical details of the actuation mechanism associated with the moving element or mounting mechanism details: constructional details of an…
For mirrors: for rotating or oscillating mirrors
For controlling the direction of light: by means of one or more reflecting elements
The optical element being reflective, e.g. mirror: the reflective optical element being an intrinsic part of a MEMS device, i.e. fabricated…
Term ended 25 Aug 2020 (estimated)
Optical switches have been developed using guided wave devices or free-space mechanical devices. Guided wave devices use waveguides, whereas free-space devices use optical beams in free space with movable optical elements such as mirrors or lenses.
Guided wave devices typically divert light from one arm of the device into the other by changing the refractive index of one of the arms of the device. This is typically done using electrical, thermal, or some other actuating mechanism.
The free-space approach has an advantage over the guided-wave approach in some applications. It has very low cross talk because the waveguides are physically isolated from one another and coupling cannot occur. The principal source of cross talk in this approach is scattering off the movable optical element. In addition, free-space devices are wavelength-independent and often temperature-independent.
FIGS. 1A-1K illustrate a method of fabricating an optical switch in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment of an optical switch in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 3 illustrates the switching time of a preferred embodiment of the invention.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
A preferred method of fabricating a micromechanical optical switch is illustrated in the process sequence of Figures 1A-1K. This method begins with a substrate 10, such as silica wafer, in which a cavity or trench 12 has been formed by standard etching techniques. As described in detail below, the substrate can include one or more optical waveguides. A first mask pattern is formed for conductive routing lines by depositing a photoresist layer 14 and selectively removing portions thereof to define the metallization pattern 16,18.
In Figure 1B, a conductor layer 20 is formed, preferably by evaporation of a metal. In a preferred embodiment, a plurality of layers including a titanium layer, a nickel layer and a gold layer are used to provide the desired electrical and mechanical properties. In an example, the titanium layer has a thickness of 500 Å, the nickel layer has a thickness of 1500 Å and the gold layer has a thickness of 3000 Å. A rinse can be used to remove excess metal and the photoresist and overlying metal is than removed to provide conductive routing lines 30 shown in FIG. 1C.