Optical fiber grating
AssigneeUniversity of Southampton
InventorsRicardo Feced, Michael Nickolaos Zervas, Michael Kevan Durkin
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeUniversity of Southampton
InventorsRicardo Feced, Michael Nickolaos Zervas, Michael Kevan Durkin
Estimating the term…
Methods and apparatus for creating a Bragg grating in an optical waveguide having an optical fiber on which the Bragg grating is defined, the Bragg grating having an actual response which closely approximates a desired response. The Bragg grating comprises a plurality of lines, each line being defined by a respective strength, and each line having a relative displacement from adjacent lines. The Bragg grating is designed using a serial iterative response. The serial iterative process can be used to calculate the strength and the line spacing of at least some of the lines. The serial iterative process can further be a function of a coupling function, which is a function of the strength and line spacing of the lines of the grating. A moving window can be used to limit the number of reflections in the impulse response which is used to calculate the next serial line spacing. The serial iterative process can further be a function of the group velocity of light in the optical fiber, the reflectivity of the grating, and the dispersion response of the grating.
An optical waveguide defining a Bragg grating wherein the Bragg grating is designed using a serial iterative process, and wherein the Bragg grating is defined by a first end, and further wherein the serial iterative process is begun at the first end of the Bragg grating, and further wherein the Bragg grating comprises a plurality of lines, each line being defined by a respective strength, and each line having a relative displacement from adjacent lines, and wherein the serial iterative process is used to calculate the strength and the line spacing of at least some of the lines.
An optical waveguide defining a Bragg grating having a first end and a second end, and wherein the Bragg grating is defined by:
An optical fiber defining a Bragg grating having a first end and a second end, and wherein the Bragg grating is defined by:
An optical fiber filter, the filter comprising a Bragg grating defined by a grating response and an impulse response, and wherein the filter is defined by a filter response which is a predetermined function of the grating response, and further wherein the grating response is selected to be a function of the impulse response at a time t0 and at a length z0 along the Bragg grating.
A method for fabricating a Bragg grating on an optical fiber, the Bragg grating having a selected grating response, the method comprising:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
Light guides comprising a diffractive element, e.g. grating in or on the light guide such that diffracted light is confined in the light guide:…
Optical elements, systems or apparatus
Term ended 19 Oct 2020 (estimated)
USPTO file history isn’t available for this patent, so only indexed dates are shown.
This invention relates to an optical fiber grating defined on an optical fiber.
There is a demand for optical fiber gratings that can be designed and manufactured such that their response is tailored to ideal responses.
In many applications such as dense wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) transmission systems and satellite communications, optical amplifiers and transmitters, optical filters having ideal amplitude and phase responses are desired in order to maximize bandwidth or to optimize the filtering function provided by the fiber Bragg grating.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described solely by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention depicting line spacing and strength
We have developed a fiber grating synthesis method which uses a synthesis algorithm based on a differential method. More particularly, the algorithm is based on the differential IS method, wherein the medium is inverted in the time domain. It should be stressed that, in contrast with the iterative integral IS algorithm, the iteration process of the present invention is serial and, as a consequence, each grating section is fully reconstructed in a single step and used for the determination of subsequent segments (layers). The inverse scattering principle relies on the synthesis in the time domain of the grating impulse response. The first step is to build a physically realizable impulse response that closely corresponds to the required spectral response of the filter. At each time instant t0 and corresponding maximum penetration length L(t0), the impulse response is renormalised, by subtracting the contributions of all the possible previous multiple reflections within the grating (past history), providing uniquely the grating coupling constant at L(t0). The algorithm can be practically implemented in different ways. Initially, the grating has to be adequately discretised. Then, either mixed time-frequency or purely time leapfrogging strategies can be used. Preferably, a transfer matrix method is used to solve the propagation problem in both cases.
FIG. 1 shows an optical waveguide 1 defining a Bragg grating 2 wherein the Bragg grating 2 is designed using an iterative process in accordance with the present invention. The optical waveguide 1 can comprise an optical fiber or a planar waveguide. The planar waveguide can be constructed from glass with indiffused waveguides. The optical waveguide 1 can comprise a core 9 and a cladding 10 and at least part of at least one of the core 9 and cladding 10 are photosensitive. Input light 6 of a wavelength 7 launches an optical mode 11 which propagates along the optical waveguide 1 with a defined group velocity 12. The Bragg grating 2, which is defined on the core 9, induces reflection of the input light 6 yielding reflected light 8. The Bragg grating 2 is defined by a first end 3 and a second end 4 and a length 5 along the grating measured from the first end 3. The Bragg grating 2 has an overall length 13 as shown in FIG. 1.
The iterative process is preferably started at the first end 3 of the Bragg grating 2 moving along the grating 2 in incremental steps. Alternatively, the iterative process can be commenced at an arbitrary position within the Bragg grating 2, and elements are added to the Bragg grating 2 in a random or sequential fashion.