# US 5,995,008 A · Fire detection method and apparatus using overlapping spectral bands

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 5,995,008 A
- Document ID: US5995008A
- Status: Granted
- Kind: A
- Application number: 08/852,086
- Filed: 1997-05-07
- Granted: 1999-11-30
- Earliest claimed: 1997-05-07
- Assignees: Detector Electronics Corporation
- Inventors: John D. King; Frederick J. Schuler
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US5995008A

## CPC

- G08B 17/12: Actuation by presence of radiation or particles, e.g. of infrared radiation or of ions
- G08B: SIGNALLING SYSTEMS, e.g. PERSONAL CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS

## Abstract

An optical fire detector employs two or more sensors operating a different spectral bands. The spectral bands are selected to have approximately coincident cut-off wavelengths in order to make the detector's ability to positively identify a fire more uniform over its field of view. The use of three overlapping spectral bands provides the detector with enhanced detection capabilities for large, hot fires that behave like black body radiators.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A method of monitoring an area for the presence of a fire, comprising:
sensing radiation within a first spectral band, and within a second spectral band broader than, and overlapping, the first spectral band, each of the spectral bands having long and short cut-off wavelengths, a separation between one of the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands being less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of the first spectral band and greater than 0% of the bandwidth of the first spectral band; and
determining from the sensed radiation whether a fire is present in the monitored area.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, wherein the separation is less than approximately 15% of the bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 3 (depends on 2)

A method as recited in claim 2, wherein the separation is less than approximately 5% of the bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 4 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, wherein the second spectral band has a bandwidth of approximately three times a bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 5 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first spectral band encompasses at least a portion of a CO.sub.2 emission peak at approximately 4.5 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than 0.2 .mu.m.

### Claim 6 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, further comprising sensing radiation within a third spectral band broader than, and overlapping, the first spectral band, a short cut-off wavelength of the third spectral band being substantially similar to the short cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band where the first and second spectral bands have substantially similar long cut-off wavelengths, and a long cut-off wavelength of the third spectral band being substantially similar to the long cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band where the first and second spectral bands have substantially similar short cut-off wavelengths.

### Claim 7 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, further comprising sensing radiation within a third spectral band whose center wavelength is longer than a center wavelength of the first spectral band where the center wavelength of the first spectral band is longer than a center wavelength of the second spectral band, and whose center wavelength is shorter than the center wavelength of the first spectral band where the center wavelength of the first spectral band is shorter than the a center wavelength of the second spectral band.

### Claim 8 (depends on 7)

A method as recited in claim 7, wherein the third spectral band does not overlap the first or second spectral bands.

### Claim 9 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, wherein determining whether a fire is present comprises extracting flicker frequency components for the radiation sensed in the first and second spectral bands.

### Claim 10 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, wherein determining whether a fire is present comprises analyzing relative amounts of radiation sensed in the first and second spectral bands.

### Claim 11 (depends on 1)

A method as recited in claim 1, wherein incident angular dependencies of the first and second short cut-off wavelengths are substantially similar.

### Claim 12

Apparatus for detecting a fire in a monitored area, comprising:
first and second sensors sensitive to radiation in first and second spectral bands respectively, the second spectral band being wider than, and overlapping, each of the spectral bands having long and short cut-off wavelengths, one of the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands being substantially similar, a separation between the one of the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands is less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of the first spectral band and greater than 0% of the bandwidth of the first spectral band; and
a processing unit configured to determine the presence of a fire in the monitored area based on signals received from the first and second sensors.

### Claim 13 (depends on 12)

An apparatus as recited in claim 12, wherein the separation is less than approximately 15% of the bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 14 (depends on 13)

An apparatus as recited in claim 13, wherein the separation is less than approximately 5% of the bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 15 (depends on 12)

An apparatus as recited in claim 12, wherein the processing unit processes a signal associated with a ratio of the signals received from the first and second sensors.

### Claim 16 (depends on 12)

An apparatus as recited in claim 12, wherein the processing unit correlates the signals received from the first and second sensors.

### Claim 17 (depends on 12)

An apparatus as recited in claim 12, wherein the processing unit analyzes temporal dependence of amplitude variation of the radiation in the first and second spectral bands.

### Claim 18 (depends on 12)

An apparatus as recited in claim 12, wherein the first spectral band encompasses at least a portion of a CO.sub.2 emission peak at approximately 4.5 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than 0.2 .mu.m.

### Claim 19 (depends on 12)

An apparatus as recited in claim 12, further comprising a third sensor sensitive to radiation within a third spectral band whose center wavelength is longer than a center wavelength of the first spectral band where the center wavelength of the first spectral band is longer than a center wavelength of the second spectral band, and whose center wavelength is shorter than the center wavelength of the first spectral band where the center wavelength of the first spectral band is shorter than the a center wavelength of the second spectral band.

### Claim 20 (depends on 12)

An apparatus as recited in claim 12, further comprising a third sensor sensitive to radiation in a third spectral band broader than, and overlapping, the first spectral band, a short cut-off wavelength of the third spectral band being substantially similar to the short cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band where the first and second spectral bands have substantially similar long cut-off wavelengths, and a long cut-off wavelength of the third spectral band being substantially similar to the long cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band where the first and second spectral bands have substantially similar short cut-off wavelengths.

### Claim 21

A method of monitoring for the presence of a fire, comprising:
monitoring radiation at a plurality of overlapping spectral bands, where one of short cut-off wavelengths of each of the spectral bands and long cut-off wavelengths of each of the spectral bands vary with angle of incidence on a corresponding sensor in an essentially similar manner; and
determining the presence of the fire based on relative amounts of radiation in the spectral bands.

### Claim 22 (depends on 21)

A method as recited in claim 21, wherein the cut-off wavelengths of one of the plurality of spectral bands have an angle-dependence within 25% of the angle dependence of the cut-off wavelengths of another of the plurality of spectral bands.

### Claim 23 (depends on 22)

A method as recited in claim 22, wherein cut-off wavelengths of the one and the other of the plurality of spectral bands have angle-dependencies within 15%.

### Claim 24 (depends on 21)

A method as recited in claim 21, wherein one of the plurality of spectral bands is centered at approximately 4.45 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than approximately 0.2 .mu.m.

### Claim 25 (depends on 21)

A method as recited in claim 21, wherein the one of the short cut-off wavelengths and the long cut-off wavelengths of two of the plurality of spectral bands are essentially similar.

### Claim 26 (depends on 25)

A method as recited in claim 25, wherein the one of the short cut-off wavelengths and the long cut-off wavelengths of the two of the plurality of spectral bands are separated by less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of a narrower of the two of the plurality of spectral bands.

### Claim 27 (depends on 21)

A method as recited in claim 21, further comprising a spectral band which is non-overlapping with the plurality of overlapping spectral bands.

### Claim 28 (depends on 27)

A method as recited in claim 27, wherein determining the presence of the fire comprises comparing relative amounts of radiation monitored in the overlapping and non-overlapping spectral bands.

### Claim 29 (depends on 21)

A method as recited in claim 21, wherein determining the presence of the fire comprises extracting flicker frequency components from the radiation monitored in the spectral bands.

### Claim 30 (depends on 21)

A method as recited in claim 21, wherein determining whether a fire is present comprises analyzing relative amounts of radiation sensed in first and second spectral bands.

### Claim 31

Apparatus for detecting fire in a monitored area, comprising:
a plurality of sensors sensitive to radiation in corresponding overlapping spectral bands, one of short cut-off wavelengths for each of the spectral bands and long cut-off wavelengths for each of the spectral bands having essentially similar variations with angle of incidence on the corresponding sensor; and
a processing unit coupled to the sensors and configured to determine the presence of a fire based on signals received from the plurality of sensors.

### Claim 32 (depends on 31)

An apparatus as recited in claim 31, wherein the cut-off wavelengths of one of the plurality of spectral bands have an angle-dependence within 25% of the angle-dependence of the cut-off wavelengths of another of the plurality of spectral bands.

### Claim 33 (depends on 32)

An apparatus as recited in claim 32, wherein the angle-dependencies of the cut-off wavelengths of the one and the other of the plurality of spectral bands are within 15%.

### Claim 34 (depends on 31)

An apparatus as recited in claim 31, wherein the processing unit processes a signal associated with a ratio of the signals received from the plurality of sensors.

### Claim 35 (depends on 31)

An apparatus as recited in claim 31, wherein the processing unit correlates the signals received from the plurality of sensors.

### Claim 36 (depends on 31)

An apparatus as recited in claim 31, wherein the processing unit analyzes temporal dependence of amplitude variation of the radiation in the spectral bands.

### Claim 37 (depends on 31)

An apparatus as recited in claim 31, wherein one of the spectral bands is centered at approximately 4.5 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than 0.2 .mu.m.

### Claim 38 (depends on 31)

An apparatus as recited in claim 31, further comprising a further sensor sensitive to radiation in a spectral band non-overlapping with the plurality of overlapping spectral bands.

### Claim 39 (depends on 31)

An apparatus as recited in claim 31, wherein the one of the short cut-off wavelengths and the long cut-off wavelengths of the spectral bands are essentially similar for two of the spectral bands.

### Claim 40 (depends on 39)

An apparatus as recited in claim 39, wherein the one of the short cut-off wavelengths and the long cut-off wavelengths of the two of the plurality of spectral bands are separated by less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of a narrower of the two of the plurality of spectral bands.

### Claim 41 (depends on 38)

An apparatus as recited in claim 38, wherein the non-overlapping spectral band is centered at a wavelength less than the overlapping spectral bands.

### Claim 42

A method of detecting radiation in an area where there is a risk of fire, comprising monitoring radiation at a plurality of overlapping spectral bands, each spectral band having a short and a long cut-off wavelength, one of short and long cut-off wavelength of at least two of the spectral bands varying with angle of incidence on a sensor used to monitor the spectral bands in a substantially similar manner.

### Claim 43

A method of detecting radiation in an area where there is a risk of fire, comprising:
monitoring radiation in at least three spectral bands, each of the spectral bands having a short and a long cut-off wavelength, short cut-off wavelengths of first and second spectral bands being essentially similar and long cut-off wavelengths of first and third spectral bands being essentially similar, the first spectral band being narrower than the second and third spectral bands.

### Claim 44

A method of monitoring an area for the presence of a fire, comprising:
sensing radiation within first, second and third spectral bands, the second spectral band broader than, and overlapping, the first spectral band, a long cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band and a long wavelength cut-off of the second spectral band being substantially similar, the third spectral band being broader than, and overlapping, the first spectral band, a short cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band being substantially similar to a short wavelength cut-off wavelength of the third spectral band; and
determining from the sensed radiation whether a fire is present in the monitored area.

### Claim 45 (depends on 44)

A method as recited in claim 44, wherein a separation between one of a) the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and b) the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and third spectral bands is less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 46 (depends on 45)

A method as recited in claim 45, wherein a separation between the other of i) the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and ii) the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and third spectral bands is less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 47 (depends on 44)

A method as recited in claim 44, wherein the first spectral band encompasses at least a portion of a CO.sub.2 emission peak at approximately 4.5 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than 0.2 .mu.m.

### Claim 48 (depends on 44)

A method as recited in claim 44, wherein the first spectral band has a center wavelength between center wavelengths of the second and third spectral bands.

### Claim 49 (depends on 44)

A method as recited in claim 44, wherein determining whether a fire is present comprises extracting flicker frequency components for the radiation sensed in the first and second spectral bands.

### Claim 50 (depends on 44)

A method as recited in claim 44, wherein incident angular dependencies of the first and second short cut-off wavelengths are substantially similar.

### Claim 51

A method of monitoring an area for the presence of a fire, comprising:
sensing radiation within first, second and third spectral bands, the second spectral band being broader than, and overlapping, the first spectral band, each of the spectral bands having long and short cut-off wavelengths, one of i) the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and ii) the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands being substantially similar, the first spectral band having a center wavelength between center wavelengths of the second and third spectral bands; and
determining from the sensed radiation whether a fire is present in the monitored area.

### Claim 52 (depends on 51)

A method as recited in claim 51, wherein a separation between the one of i) the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and ii) the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands is less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 53 (depends on 51)

A method as recited in claim 51, wherein the first spectral band encompasses at least a portion of a CO.sub.2 emission peak at approximately 4.5 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than 0.2 .mu.m.

### Claim 54 (depends on 51)

A method as recited in claim 51, wherein a long cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band and a long wavelength cut-off of thc second spectral band are substantially similar, the third spectral band is broader than, and overlaps, the first spectral band, and a short cut-off wavelength of the first spectral band is substantially similar to a short wavelength cut-off wavelength of the third spectral band.

### Claim 55 (depends on 51)

A method as recited in claim 51, wherein the third spectral band lies outside both the first and second spectral bands.

### Claim 56 (depends on 51)

A method as recited in claim 51, wherein determining whether a fire is present comprises extracting flicker frequency components for the radiation sensed in the first and second spectral bands.

### Claim 57 (depends on 51)

A method as recited in claim 51, wherein incident angular dependencies of the first and second short cut-off wavelengths are substantially similar.

### Claim 58

Apparatus for detecting a fire in a monitored area, comprising:
first, second and third sensors sensitive to radiation in first, second and third spectral bands respectively, the second spectral band being wider than the first spectral band, each of the spectral bands having long and short cut-off wavelengths, the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands being substantially similar and the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and third spectral bands being substantially similar; and
a processing unit coupled to receive signals from the first, second and third sensors, and to determine the presence of a fire in the monitored area based on the received signals.

### Claim 59 (depends on 58)

An apparatus as recited in claim 58, wherein a separation between one of a) the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and b) the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and third spectral bands is less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 60 (depends on 58)

An apparatus as recited in claim 58, wherein the processing unit correlates the signals received from at least two of the sensors.

### Claim 61 (depends on 58)

An apparatus as recited in claim 58, wherein the processing unit analyzes temporal dependence of amplitude variation of the radiation in at least two of the spectral bands.

### Claim 62 (depends on 58)

An apparatus as recited in claim 58, wherein the first spectral band encompasses at least a portion of a CO.sub.2 emission peak at approximately 4.5 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than 0.2 .mu.m.

### Claim 63 (depends on 58)

An apparatus as recited in claim 58, wherein the first spectral band has a center wavelength between central wavelengths of the second and third spectral bands.

### Claim 64

Apparatus for detecting a fire in a monitored area, comprising:
first, second and third sensors sensitive to radiation in first, second and third spectral bands respectively, the second spectral band being wider than, and overlapping the first spectral band, the first spectral band having a center wavelength between center wavelengths of the second and third spectral bands; and
a processing unit configured to determine the presence of a fire in the monitored area based on signals received from the first and second sensors.

### Claim 65 (depends on 64)

An apparatus as recited in claim 64, each of the spectral bands having long and short cut-off wavelengths, the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands being substantially similar and the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and third spectral bands being substantially similar.

### Claim 66 (depends on 65)

An apparatus as recited in claim 65, wherein a separation between one of a) the long cut-off wavelengths of the first and second spectral bands and b) the short cut-off wavelengths of the first and third spectral bands is less than approximately 50% of a bandwidth of the first spectral band.

### Claim 67 (depends on 64)

An apparatus as recited in claim 64, wherein the processing unit correlates the signals received from at least two of the sensors.

### Claim 68 (depends on 64)

An apparatus as recited in claim 64, wherein the processing unit analyzes temporal dependence of amplitude variation of the radiation in at least two of the spectral bands.

### Claim 69 (depends on 64)

An apparatus as recited in claim 64, wherein the first spectral band encompasses at least a portion of a CO.sub.2 emission peak at approximately 4.5 .mu.m and has a bandwidth of less than 0.2 .mu.m.