Logically ordered arrays of compounds and methods of making and using the same
AssigneeArQule, Inc.
InventorsRobert Zambias, David A. Bolten, Joseph C. Hogan, Paul Furth, David Casebier, Cheng Tu
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeArQule, Inc.
InventorsRobert Zambias, David A. Bolten, Joseph C. Hogan, Paul Furth, David Casebier, Cheng Tu
Estimating the term…
A logically ordered array of 10,240 different compounds, each compound prepared from the reaction product of an oxazolone, aldehyde and amine.
An array of 10,240 different compounds, each compound comprising the reaction product of an oxazolone, aldehyde and amine, with the oxazolone being one of the eight oxazolones of Table 1, the aldehyde being one of the thirty-two aldehydes of Table 2 and the amine being one of the forty amines of Table 3.
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
Methods of creating libraries, e.g. combinatorial synthesis: liquid phase synthesis, i.e. wherein all library building blocks are in liquid phase…
Methods of screening libraries: by measuring the ability to specifically bind a target molecule, e.g. antibody-antigen binding, receptor-ligand…
Nanoparticle, i.e. structure having three dimensions of 100 nm or less: exhibiting three-dimensional carrier confinement, e.g. quantum dots
Within specified host or matrix material, e.g. nanocomposite films: possessing nanosized particles, powders, flakes, or clusters other than simple…
Term ended 20 Jan 2015 (estimated)
USPTO file history isn’t available for this patent, so only indexed dates are shown.
The discovery of new molecules has traditionally focused in two broad areas, biologically active molecules, which are used as drugs for the treatment of life-threatening diseases, and new materials, which are used in commercial, especially high technological applications. In both areas, the strategy used to discover new molecules has involved two basic operations: (i) a more or less random choice of a molecular candidate, prepared either via chemical synthesis or isolated from natural sources, and (ii) the testing of the molecular candidate for the property or properties of interest. This discovery cycle is repeated indefinitely until a molecule possessing the desirable properties is located. In the majority of cases, the molecular types chosen for testing have belonged to rather narrowly defined chemical classes. For example, the discovery of new peptide hormones has involved work with peptides; the discovery of new therapeutic steroids has involved work with the steroid nucleus; the discovery of new surfaces to be used in the construction of computer chips or sensors has involved work with inorganic materials, etc. (for example, see R. Hirschmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. in Engl. 1991, 30, 1278-1301). As a result, the discovery of new functional molecules, being, ad hoc in nature and relying predominantly on serendipity, has been an extremely time-consuming, laborious, unpredictable, and costly enterprise.
A brief account of the strategies and tactics used in the discovery of new molecules is described below. The emphasis is on biologically interesting molecules. However, as discussed below, there are technical problems encountered in the discovery of molecules and in the development of fabricated materials which can serve as new materials for high technological applications.
Modern theories of biological activity state that biological activities, and therefore physiological states, are the result of molecular recognition events. For example, nucleotides can form complementary base pairs so that complementary single-stranded molecules hybridize resulting in double- or triple-helical structures that appear to be involved in regulation of gene expression. In another example, a biologically active molecule, referred to as a ligand, binds with another molecule, usually a macromolecule referred to as ligand-acceptor (e.g. a receptor or an enzyme), and this binding elicits a chain of molecular events which ultimately gives rise to a physiological state, e.g. normal cell growth and differentiation, abnormal cell growth leading to carcinogenesis, blood-pressure regulation, nerve-impulse-generation and -propagation, etc. The binding between ligand and ligand-acceptor is geometrically characteristic and extraordinarily specific, involving appropriate three-dimensional structural arrangements and chemical interactions.
FIG. 1 is a graphic presentation of the steps followed for combining the building blocks to form the AN-1001 array; and
FIG. 2 is a scematic diagram of the process sequence used to form the compounds in the array.
This invention pertains to the logical layout, construction and testing of arrays of chemical compound for one of a variety of applications, in which the desired properties of the compound can be measured and correlated to specific ordered changes in the fragments use to construct them. The array is ordered in such a fashion as to expedite assembly, to maximize the informational content derived from the testing and to facilitate the rapid extraction of that data from the testing process. This method has great utility in accelerating the development of compounds have the optimal properties for the desired application.
The arrays are constructed from logically ordered and arranged sub-arrays of compounds. Each sub-array consists of spatially addressable sets of structurally related individual chemical compounds, ranging in number from one to 10.sup.12 and possessing the following properties: (1) a common structural scaffold element referred to as a "molecular core" and (2) a variable structural diversity element referred to as a fragment, in such a manner that the variation between any two compounds within a given sub-array consists only of either zero (0) or one (1) change in a fragment. These arrays may in turn be arranged in such a manner to form higher order arrays consisting of sets of arrays and tested to provide information regarding the optimum structural features available for the application.
The sub-arrays are arranged in such a manner that the direct comparisons of compounds automatically yields information regarding the effect known fragments have on a desired application, as well as on the effect on changes in physical and reactive properties. As provided by simple set theory for any number of independently variable structural diversity elements ea, there exists n logical higher order array arrangements, such that relational information on the effect of variation of each of the n structural diversity elements can be obtained in a similar manner by comparison of testing data from the relative addresses in appropriately arranged sub-arrays.