# US 5,702,202 A · Laying beam for a road finisher > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 5,702,202 A - Document ID: US5702202A - Status: Granted - Kind: A - Application number: 08/587,518 - Filed: 1996-01-17 - Granted: 1997-12-30 - Earliest claimed: 1995-01-17 - Assignees: Svedala Strassenfertiger GmbH - Inventors: Burkhard Schleiter - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US5702202A ## CPC - E01C 19/40: adapted to impart a smooth finish to the paving, e.g. tamping or vibrating finishers - E01C 2301/10: Heated screeds - E01C 2301/16: Laterally slidable screeds - E01C: CONSTRUCTION OF, OR SURFACES FOR, ROADS, SPORTS GROUNDS, OR THE LIKE; MACHINES OR AUXILIARY TOOLS FOR CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR (forming roads or like surfaces by compacting or grading snow or ice E01H) ## Abstract For changing the working width of a road finisher, its laying beam (10) is composed of a (central) main beam (13) and two shifting beams (14). In the retracted state, the shifting beams (14) must have only an overall width which is not greater than that of the main beam (13). Furthermore, the working width of the laying beam (10) may be increased by extending the shifting beams (14) to twice the width of the main beam (13). In this case, there is no longer any overlap between the main beam (13) and the shifting beams (14), but the transition of the main beam (13) to the shifting beams (14) causes unsightly imprints on the finished road surfacing. This problem is solved by providing a laying beam (10) which, by offset projections (20, 21) on the shifting beams (14), forms an overlap between marginal regions of the shifting beams (14) and the main beam (13) when the shifting beams (14) are fully extended. This avoids unsightly imprints on the finished road surfacing. The offset of the projections (20, 21) in relation to one another allows the shifting beams (14) nevertheless to be retracted to such an extent that the overall width of the two retracted shifting beams (14) is not greater than the width of the main beam (13). ## Claims ### Claim 1 A laying beam (10) for a road finisher (11), said beam (10) having a main beam (13), arranged on the road finisher (11), and two shifting beams (14) which can be shifted with respect to the main beam (13) transversely to a longitudinal working direction (12) of the road finisher (11), characterized in that the two shifting beams (14) have confronting end faces (19) which have respective projections (20, 21), and in that each projection (20, 21) of one of said two shifting beams (14) is offset with respect to a corresponding projection (20, 21) of the other shifting beam (14). ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that each of the two shifting beams has depressions between said projections, and in that the projections (20, 21) of each of the two shifting beams (14) engage in corresponding ones of said depressions (22) of the other of the two shifting beams (14). ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) Laying beam according to claim 2, characterized in that the depressions (22) are slightly larger than the projections (20, 21). ### Claim 4 (depends on 2) Laying beam according to claim 2, characterized in that each depression (22) is bounded by oppositely lying projections (20, 21). ### Claim 5 (depends on 2) The laying beam according to claim 2, characterized in that each shifting beam has a lower base plate (25), and in that the projections (20, 21) and depressions (22) extend merely over the lower base plate (25) of each of the two shifting beams (14). ### Claim 6 (depends on 2) Laying beam according to claim 2, characterized in that the projections (20, 21) and depressions (22) have a substantially rectangular base area. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) Laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that alongside each projection (20, 21) of each shifting beam (14) there is arranged at least one depression (22) in each case. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) Laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that each projection (20, 21) of the one shifting beam (14) is offset in such a way with respect to each projection (20, 21) of the other shifting beam (14) that each projection (20, 21) of the one shifting beam (14) engages in a respective depression (22) of the other shifting beam (14). ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that each shifting beam (14) has a width which is greater than half a width of the main beam (13). ### Claim 10 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that the projections (20, 21) have a length, extending transversely to the working direction (12), which corresponds approximately to twice an overlap of a respective extended shifting beam (14) and the main beam (13). ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) Laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that each shifting beam (14) has a plurality of said projections (20, 21), following one another at intervals, and depressions (22) arranged next to the projections (20, 21). ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that each of a front side and a rear side of each shifting beam (14) has one of said projections (20, 21). ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The laying beam according to claim 12, characterized in that the projection (21) on the front side of at least one shifting beam (14) is narrower than other projections (20) of said at least one shifting beam (14). ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that one shifting beam (14) has an offset with respect to the other shifting beam (14) in the working direction (12) of the road finisher (11). ### Claim 15 (depends on 14) The laying beam according to claim 14, characterized in that the shifting beams (14) are offset in such a manner to form, between the two shifting beams, an offset that corresponds to a width of a narrow front one of said projections (21) of the one shifting beam (14) and to a width of a tamper blade (17) adapted to be arranged in front of said narrow front projection (21). ### Claim 16 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that the shifting beams (14) have confronting end plates (26) which are arranged on said confronting end faces (19) of the shifting beams (14), and which are set back with respect to the projections (20, 21). ### Claim 17 (depends on 16) Laying beam according to claim 16, characterized in that the end plates (26) of the shifting beams (14) are set back with respect to the projections (20, 21) at least by a length of the depressions (22). ### Claim 18 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that undersides (27) of all the projections (20, 21) of each shifting beam (14) lie in a common plane. ### Claim 19 (depends on 18) The laying beam according to claim 18, characterized in that said common plane rises slightly in said working direction (12) of the road finisher (11). ### Claim 20 (depends on 1) The laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that the projections (20, 21) have from sides (28) which may transversely to the working direction (12) of the road finisher (11), and which are provided with bevels (29) rising in the working direction (12) of the road finisher (11). ### Claim 21 (depends on 1) Laying beam according to claim 1, characterized in that the projections (20, 21) are separately heatable.