# US 5,677,966 A · Interactive automated cytology method incorporating both manual and automatic determinations > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 5,677,966 A - Document ID: US5677966A - Status: Granted - Kind: A - Application number: 08/483,637 - Filed: 1995-06-07 - Granted: 1997-10-14 - Earliest claimed: 1993-10-12 - Assignees: Autocyte, Inc. - Inventors: Rainer Hermann Doerrer; Jochen Ernst Fischer; Ernest Arthur Knesel; Thanh Van Nguyen - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US5677966A ## CPC - G06V 20/69: Microscopic objects, e.g. biological cells or cellular parts - G01N 15/1433: using image recognition - G01N 2021/0181: {Memory or computer-assisted visual determination} - G06V: IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING - G01N: INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES (measuring or testing apparatus or processes other than immunoassay, involving enzymes or microorganisms C12M, C12Q) ## Abstract An automated interactive cytology system provides expedited handling of samples, minimizing false negatives, while not substantially increasing the number false positives. A computerized system identifies and displays the cells which are of greatest interest to the cytologist. The system then processes this information on all cells identified to classify the slide as normal, abnormal, or questionable based on a statistical analysis of cells meeting given criteria. Before displaying the results of the statistical analysis, a cytologist reviews the cells which the computer has determined to be most significant. It is only then after the cytologist has determined whether the cells are positive, negative, or questionable, that the determination is inputted into the automated system. The automated system then compares the cytologist's analysis with its own statistical analysis. Based on the two opinions, the cytologist determines how to advise a doctor regarding the sample. ## Claims ### Claim 1 An interactive method for evaluating objects of interest in a sample using a computer-assisted system and an operator, which comprises: (a) the system scanning the sample using an automated scanning device and generating scan data corresponding to the sample; (b) the system identifying the objects of interest from the scan data by comparing the scan data with previously inputted reference data corresponding to a first predetermined set of characteristics; (c) the system generating a gallery of objects of interest selected from the identified objects of interest, the gallery including the objects of interest which exhibit the first predetermined set of characteristics; (d) the system statistically analyzing occurrence of all objects of interest within the scan data and determining whether the statistical occurrence meets a predetermined threshold; (e) the operator viewing the gallery to determine whether any of the objects of interest in the gallery exhibit a second predetermined set of characteristics without knowing the system's determination; (f) the operator inputting into the system the determination of whether the objects of interest in the gallery exhibit the second predetermined set of characteristics; (g) then the system displaying to the operator the determination of whether the statistical occurrence of all objects of interest within the scan data meets the predetermined threshold; and (h) comparing the operator's determination with the system's determination, agreement indicating the given criterion has been met so as to achieve interaction of the evaluation. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The interactive method of claim 1, wherein the scanning comprises scanning a microscope slide. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The interactive method of claim 2, wherein the microscope slide contains cytological material. ### Claim 4 (depends on 3) The interactive method of claim 3, wherein the first predetermined set of characteristics correspond to physically identifiable parameters. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The interactive method of claim 4, wherein the physically identifiable set of parameters are selected from the group consisting of cell size, nuclear size, color and shape. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The interactive method of claim 1, wherein the generating of scan data comprises forming a digital image of the scanned sample. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The interactive method of claim 1, wherein the generating of the gallery further comprises displaying the gallery on a television screen. ### Claim 8 (depends on 7) The interactive method of claim 7, wherein the television screen is a high definition television screen. ### Claim 9 (depends on 7) The interactive method of claim 7, wherein the television screen displays about 60 cells at one time. ### Claim 10 (depends on 1) The interactive method of claim 1, wherein the first predetermined characteristic and the second predetermined characteristic are the same. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The interactive method of claim 1, wherein the computing of the occurrence of the objects of interest comprises assigning a value to each object of interest based on the number and nature of the characteristics identified from the first predetermined set of characteristics which are present on each object of interest. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The interactive method of claim 1, wherein the values assigned to the objects of interest are totaled and compared to a predetermined value, thereby determining whether occurrence meets the predetermined threshold. ### Claim 13 (depends on 1) The interactive method of claim 1 further comprising manually reviewing the slide if the operator's determination and the system's determination do not agree.