# US 5,345,479 A · Sensitivity enhancement for airborne radioactivity monitoring system to detect reactor coolant leaks > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 5,345,479 A - Document ID: US5345479A - Status: Granted - Kind: A - Application number: 08/032,579 - Filed: 1993-03-17 - Granted: 1994-09-06 - Earliest claimed: 1993-03-17 - Assignees: Westinghouse Electric Corp. - Inventors: Kingsley F. Graham - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US5345479A ## CPC - G21C 17/002: {Detection of leaks (by testing the coolant or the moderator G21C17/04)} - G21C 17/04: Detecting burst slugs - Y02E 30/30: Nuclear fission reactors - G21C: NUCLEAR REACTORS (fusion reactors, hybrid fission-fusion reactors G21B; nuclear explosives G21J) - Y02E: REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION ## Abstract A method and apparatus for measuring radioactivity associated with nuclear reactor coolant leaks. The method includes providing a delay tank in a gas sampling line upstream of a radiation particulate monitor, the delay tank allowing radioactive noble gases from the leak to decay to radioactive daughter particulates that are monitored by the radiation particulate monitor. The apparatus includes the delay tank as well as a background delay tank and a valve sequencer for comparing radiation associated with the delay tank to radiation associated with the background delay tank. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method of detecting nuclear reactor radioactive gas leaks, including the steps of: a. providing a sample line for sampling radioactive gases leaking from a nuclear reactor; b. providing a first delay tank in said sample line downstream from said nuclear reactor, said first delay tank sized to retain said radioactive gases for a sufficient residence time to enable said radioactive gases to decay to radionuclide particulates; c. providing an airborne radioactive particulate monitoring means in said sample line downstream from said first delay tank; d. measuring the activity associated with said radionuclide particulates with said airborne radioactive particulate monitoring means. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further including the step of: e. comparing the activity measured in step (d) with an acceptable activity, and if the measured activity substantially exceeds the acceptable activity, triggering an alarm means. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The method of claim 2, wherein said comparing is achieved by using a background radiation sampling line having a background radiation delay tank therein, upstream from a said particulate monitor, said background radiation delay tank being of substantially the same size as said first delay tank, and wherein said acceptable activity comprises the activity associated with said background delay tank as monitored by said particulate monitoring means. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said radioactive gases include at least one of .sup.88 Kr, .sup.89 Kr, and .sup.138 Xe. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4, wherein said radionuclide particulates include at least one of .sup.88 Rb, .sup.89 Rb, and .sup.138 Cs. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said first delay tank is sized to maintain laminar flow through said first delay tank at gas flow rates of about 1-5 cfm. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said residence time is selected to coincide with peak total radionuclide particulate concentration being measured by said airborne radioactive particulate monitoring means. ### Claim 8 In a nuclear reactor radioactivity monitoring system having a sampling line for sampling transporting radioactive gases leaking from a reactor, the improvement comprising a first delay tank in said sampling line downstream from said reactor for holding said radioactive gases for a residence time sufficient to enable said radioactive gases to decay to airborne radionuclide particulates susceptible to activity measurement, and further including an in-line airborne radioactive particulate monitor downstream from said first delay tank. ### Claim 9 (depends on 8) The nuclear reactor radioactivity monitoring system of claim 8, wherein said sampling line samples gases near at least one of control rod drive penetrations and incore instrumentation penetrations of a nuclear reactor. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The nuclear reactor radioactivity monitoring system of claim 9, wherein said first delay tank is sized to provide a radioactive gas residence time coinciding with a peak total radionuclide particulate concentration as measured by said airborne radioactive particulate monitor. ### Claim 11 (depends on 9) The nuclear reactor radioactivity monitoring system of claim 9, wherein said first delay tank has a vertical orientation. ### Claim 12 (depends on 8) The nuclear reactor radioactivity monitoring system of claim 8, further including a background sampling line receiving air from a background source external to the nuclear reactor containment vessel, said sampling line having a background delay tank downstream from said background source, said background delay tank being of substantially the same size as said first delay tank, said background delay tank being upstream of and connected to said particulate monitoring means, and said particulate monitoring means being adapted to compare radiation associated with said background delay tank to radiation associated with said first delay tank. ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The nuclear reactor radioactivity monitoring system of claim 12, wherein said first delay tank and said second delay tank are connected at their outlets by a valve sequencer means for allowing said particulate monitoring means to sample and compare radiation associated with said first delay tank and said background delay tank. ### Claim 14 (depends on 13) The nuclear reactor radioactivity monitoring system of claim 13, further including an alarm means for alerting of an upset condition wherein the radioactivity associated with said first delay tank substantially exceeds the radioactivity associated with said background delay tank.