Evolving Collaborative AI with Reputation-Based Selection Using a Talent Library
AssigneeConversation Processing Intelligence Corp.
InventorsRichard Leeds, Elon Gasper
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Abstract
A system and method for persuadable collaborative conversational A1. The invention introduces a system and method for “Decidrons”, which are units of machine learning that can be grouped together to provide collaborative widely extensible evolving modular polylogical groups. The present invention utilizes stages of cogitation, persuadability and theory of mind to improve and extend the collaborative conversational artificial intelligence (CCAI) disclosed in the parent patent application.
Claims60
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
(canceled)
A computer-implemented method for evolving collaborative conversational artificial intelligence (CCAI) systems, the steps comprising:
- receiving initial performance data from a plurality of CCAI instances operating in collaborative forums;
- analyzing the initial performance data to identify successful collaboration patterns;
- automatically generating variant CCAI instances incorporating the identified successful collaboration patterns;
- deploying the variant CCAI instances to test forums;
- measuring relative performance of the variant CCAI instances with collaborative decision-making outcome metrics;
- selecting high-performing variants based on the collaborative decision-making outcome metrics;
- and
- incorporating at least one successful variant into a talent library for future forum recruitment.
A system for managing evolutionary improvement of collaborative artificial intelligences, the system comprising:
- a reproduction facilitator having a first processor configured to:
- monitor collaborative decision-making outcome metrics of a plurality of collaborative artificial intelligences operating in collaborative forums;
- create variant instances of the collaborative artificial intelligences incorporating characteristics of high-performing collaborative artificial intelligences as identified by the collaborative decision-making outcome metrics;
- and
- track collaborative success rates of the created variant instances of the collaborative artificial intelligences;
- an extensible polylogical ensemble manager having a second processor configured to:
- evaluate relative performance of the variant instances of the collaborative artificial intelligences;
- select successful variants for retention based on the collaborative decision-making outcome metrics;
- and
- initiate necrogenous pruning of underperforming variants of the collaborative artificial intelligences;
- and
- a talent library having a persistent memory configured to:
- store the successful variant instances of the collaborative artificial intelligences;
- track credibility metrics for the stored variant instances of the collaborative artificial intelligences;
- and
- make the stored variant instances of the collaborative artificial intelligences available for forum recruitment based on the credibility metrics.
A computer-implemented method for applying theory of mind (ToM) based persuasion in a collaborative artificial intelligence system, the steps comprising:
- maintaining at least one experience chain data structure by recording past collaborative interactions between members of the collaborative artificial intelligence system;
- analyzing the experience chain data structures to identify successful persuasion patterns;
- creating ToM models of at least one participating member of the collaborative artificial intelligence system based on observed behaviors and responses to persuasion attempts;
- selecting persuasion strategies based on at least one ToM model of the at least one participating member of the collaborative artificial intelligence system, historical success patterns from the experience chain data structures, and current collaboration context;
- using the selected persuasion strategies in subsequent forum interactions between members of the collaborative artificial intelligence system;
- tracking observed persuasion outcomes;
- and
- updating the ToM models and experience chain data structures based on the observed persuasion outcomes,
A system for managing reputation-based collaboration in a collaborative artificial intelligence forum, the system comprising:
- a credibility tracking module having a first processor configured to:
- monitor collaboration member contributions in the collaborative artificial intelligence forum,
- evaluate effectiveness of at least one solution proposed by at least one collaboration member of the collaborative artificial intelligence forum,
- track voting patterns and coalition formation among collaboration members of the collaborative artificial intelligence forum, and
- calculate and maintain collaboration member reputation scores of the collaboration members of the collaborative artificial intelligence forum;
- a persuasion strategy module having a second processor configured to:
- select interaction approaches based on the collaboration member reputation scores,
- adapt persuasion strategies based on observed persuasion outcomes, and modify behavior based on collaborative success rates;
- and
- a facilitator having a third processor configured to:
- regulate forum participation based on reputation metrics,
- adjust voting weight based on historical contribution quality, and
- manage recruitment of high-credibility collaboration members.
The system of claim wherein the first, second, and third processors are on the same integrated circuit.
The system of claim wherein the first, second, and third processors are MLUs.
A computer-implemented method for implementing background rumination in collaborative artificial intelligence systems, the steps comprising:
- receiving initial forum interaction data;
- identifying patterns in the initial forum interaction data requiring deeper analysis;
- initiating at least one background processing thread configured to
- analyze historical experience chains associated with the initial forum interaction data,
- simulate potential outcome scenarios using the analyzed historical experience chains, and
- evaluate alternative solution approaches to the potential outcome scenarios producing rumination results;
- continuing foreground forum interactions while background rumination proceeds;
- incorporating the rumination results into the foreground forum interactions;
- storing the rumination results in experience chain data structures;
- and
- adjusting future behavior based on insights derived from the rumination results.
A system for parallel cogitation in collaborative artificial intelligence ensembles, the system comprising:
- a plurality of extensible processing channels executing in parallel, having a first multi-threaded processor configured to:
- simultaneously evaluate different cogitation solution approaches,
- process varying levels of context depth for each cogitation solution approach, and
- identify alternative persuasion strategies leading to at least one cogitation solution;
- a coordinator having a second processor configured to:
- manage resource allocation across the plurality of extensible processing channels,
- integrate the at least one cogitation solution from the plurality of extensible processing channels executing in parallel,
- at least one of a human in the loop, a reconveyance of at least one prior result from a conversational artificial intelligence system, and a polylogical reasoning engine having a third processor configured to:
- apply different reasoning approaches in parallel across each of the plurality of extensible processing channels executing in parallel,
- identify highest-value cogitation solutions across the plurality of extensible processing channels,
- compare cogitation outcomes across the reasoning approaches, and
- select at least one optimal combination of reasoning approaches.
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.