# US 2026/0062005 A1 · Vehicle controller, vehicle control method, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 2026/0062005 A1
- Document ID: US20260062005A1
- Status: Published application
- Kind: A1
- Application number: 19/380,654
- Filed: 2025-11-05
- Published: 2026-03-05
- Earliest claimed: 2023-05-17
- Assignees: Denso Corporation
- Applicants: Denso Corporation
- Inventors: Takuya KUME; Kazuki IZUMI
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20260062005A1

## CPC

- B60W 30/18009: {related to particular drive situations}
- B60W 30/18154: {Approaching an intersection}
- B60W 30/18159: {Traversing an intersection}
- B60W 30/18163: {Lane change; Overtaking manoeuvres}
- B60W 50/14: Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention
- B60W 60/001: {Planning or execution of driving tasks}
- B60W 60/0011: {involving control alternatives for a single driving scenario, e.g. planning several paths to avoid obstacles}
- B60W 60/0053: {from vehicle to occupant}
- B60W 60/0055: {only part of driving tasks shifted to occupants}
- G01C 21/34: Route searching; Route guidance
- G01C 21/36: Input/output arrangements for on-board computers
- G08G 1/0969: having a display in the form of a map
- B60W 2540/215: Selection or confirmation of options
- B60W 2552/10: Number of lanes
- B60W 2554/4041: Position
- B60W: CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
- G01C: MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY (measuring liquid level G01F; radio navigation, determining distance or velocity by use of propagation effects, e.g. Doppler effects, propagation time, of radio waves, analogous arrangements using other waves G01S)
- G08G: TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS (guiding railway traffic, ensuring the safety of railway traffic B61L; arrangement of road signs or traffic signals E01F9/00; radar or analogous systems, sonar systems, lidar systems specially adapted for traffic control G01S13/91, G01S15/88, G01S17/88; {radar or analogous systems, sonar systems, lidar systems specially adapted for anti-collision purposes G01S13/93, G01S15/93, G01S17/93})

## Abstract

A vehicle controller is adapted to a host vehicle having a driving control function that supports or substitutes for a driver in a driving operation of the host vehicle. The vehicle controller includes at least one of (i) a circuit and (ii) a processor with a memory storing computer program code executable by the processor. The vehicle controller recognizes a driving plan of the host vehicle that is utilized by the driving control function, and executes a route guidance notification in different modes when execution of U-turn control is planned in the driving plan, compared to when the execution of the U-turn control is not planned in the driving plan.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A vehicle controller adapted to a host vehicle equipped with a driving control function that supports or substitutes for a driver in a driving operation of the host vehicle, the vehicle controller comprising:
at least one of (i) a circuit and (ii) a processor with a memory storing computer program code executable by the processor, the at least one of the circuit and the processor configured to:
acquire a driving plan of the host vehicle that is utilized by the driving control function; and
execute a route guidance notification in different modes when U-turn control is scheduled in the driving plan, compared to when the U-turn control is not scheduled in the driving plan.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to execute the route guidance notification in an emphasized manner when the U-turn control is scheduled, compared to when the U-turn control is not scheduled.

### Claim 3 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
recognize whether a scheduled U-turn location is at an intersection, the scheduled U-turn location being where the U-turn control is scheduled;
execute the U-turn control; and
modify a content of the U-turn control, according to whether the scheduled U-turn location is at the intersection.

### Claim 4 (depends on 3)

The vehicle controller according to claim 3, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to control the host vehicle to move closer to an outer edge of a starting lane on a condition that the control execution unit executes the U-turn control in which the host vehicle U-turns from the starting lane to a destination lane, and
the outer edge of the starting lane is one of edges of the starting lane farther from the destination lane than another of the edges.

### Claim 5 (depends on 4)

The vehicle controller according to claim 4, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to control the host vehicle to move closer to the outer edge when the scheduled U-turn location is at the intersection, as compared to when the scheduled U-turn location is not at the intersection.

### Claim 6 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to change a type of the route guidance notification depending on whether the host vehicle makes a temporary stop during the U-turn control.

### Claim 7 (depends on 6)

The vehicle controller according to claim 6, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to execute the route guidance notification in an emphasized manner when the temporary stop is not performed during the U-turn control, compared to when the temporary stop is performed.

### Claim 8 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to change a type of the route guidance notification depending on whether the host vehicle performs maneuvering correction during the U-turn control.

### Claim 9 (depends on 8)

The vehicle controller according to claim 8, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to provide broader situational awareness of surroundings of the host vehicle in the route guidance notification when the maneuvering correction is performed during the U-turn control, compared to when no maneuvering correction is performed.

### Claim 10 (depends on 8)

The vehicle controller according to claim 8, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
execute the U-turn control;
determine whether the host vehicle is stuck during the U-turn control that has been started; and
start the maneuvering correction from a location where the host vehicle is determined to be stuck.

### Claim 11 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
acquire a permission for the U-turn control from an occupant of the host vehicle; and
execute the U-turn control on a condition that the permission acquisition unit acquires the permission for the U-turn control from the passenger.

### Claim 12 (depends on 11)

The vehicle controller according to claim 11, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to notify the passenger of number of times the host vehicle requires maneuvering correction for the U-turn control, as information for the passenger to determine whether to permit the U-turn control.

### Claim 13 (depends on 11)

The vehicle controller according to claim 11, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
execute the U-turn control that requires maneuvering correction only on a condition that the permission is granted by the passenger; and
execute the U-turn control that does not require the maneuvering correction even without the permission granted by the passenger.

### Claim 14 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to inquire of a passenger of the host vehicle whether to permit the U-turn control when a reroute occurs, and
the reroute is a process that modifies a path set for the host vehicle.

### Claim 15 (depends on 14)

The vehicle controller according to claim 14, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to propose to the passenger execution of the U-turn control at a recommended U-turn location, on a condition that the recommended U-turn location is present on a rerouted path acquired by the reroute, and
the recommended U-turn location is a location that satisfies a recommended condition for the U-turn control.

### Claim 16 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
avoid the U-turn control on a condition that the U-turn control is not required for the host vehicle to reach a destination set for the host vehicle; and
execute the U-turn control on a condition that the U-turn control is required for the host vehicle to reach the destination.

### Claim 17 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
execute the U-turn control; and
set an autonomous driving level for the U-turn control to a permitted autonomous driving level that is allowed in a destination lane, on a condition that the control execution unit executes the U-turn control in which the host vehicle U-turns from a starting lane to the destination lane.

### Claim 18 (depends on 17)

The vehicle controller according to claim 17, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to lower the autonomous driving level of the driving control function to the permitted autonomous driving level that is allowed on the destination lane, when the vehicle is travelling on the starting lane.

### Claim 19 (depends on 17)

The vehicle controller according to claim 17, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to adjust an obligation for the driver to hold a steering operation unit according to a control load of the U-turn control.

### Claim 20 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to execute a notification that prompts the driver to monitor surroundings of the host vehicle on a condition that the U-turn control is executed.

### Claim 21 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
recognize whether a rear vehicle is travelling behind the host vehicle;
execute the U-turn control; and
modify a scheduled driving path of the host vehicle under the U-turn control, based on whether the target recognition unit recognizes presence of the rear vehicle.

### Claim 22 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
execute the U-turn control; and
determine whether to allow the host vehicle to veer into an outer lane on a condition that the U-turn control in which the host vehicle U-turns from a starting lane to a destination lane is executed, and
the starting lane is between the outer lane and the destination lane.

### Claim 23 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
execute the U-turn control; and
modify criteria for permitting the U-turn control based on an autonomous driving level scheduled to be used during the U-turn control.

### Claim 24 (depends on 23)

The vehicle controller according to claim 23, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to lower the criteria for permitting the U-turn control as the autonomous driving level increases.

### Claim 25 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
execute the U-turn control; and
modify a scheduled driving path of the host vehicle under the U-turn control, according to an autonomous driving level that is scheduled to be used during the U-turn control.

### Claim 26 (depends on 25)

The vehicle controller according to claim 25, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to set the scheduled driving path that does not require maneuvering correction as the autonomous driving level increases.

### Claim 27 (depends on 1)

The vehicle controller according to claim 1, wherein
the at least one of the circuit and the processor is further configured to:
execute the U-turn control; and
modify a setting for permitting the U-turn control based on at least one of
a positional relation between a present location of the host vehicle and a destination that is set for the host vehicle, or
a time relation between a present time and a scheduled arrival time at the destination.

### Claim 28

A vehicle control method for controlling a host vehicle equipped with a driving control function that supports or substitutes for a driver in a driving operation of the host vehicle, the vehicle control method, which is executed by at least one processor, comprising:
recognizing a driving plan of the host vehicle that is utilized by the driving control function; and
executing a route guidance notification in different modes when U-turn control is scheduled in the driving plan, compared to when the U-turn control is not scheduled in the driving plan.

### Claim 29

A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a program comprising instructions configured to, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:
recognize a driving plan of a host vehicle that is utilized by a driving control function included in the host vehicle, the driving control function being a function that supports or substitutes for a driver in a driving operation of the host vehicle; and
execute a route guidance notification in different modes when U-turn control is scheduled in the driving plan, compared to when the U-turn control is not scheduled in the driving plan.
