# US 2025/0086091 A1 · Systems and methods for lab generation, test management and device monitoring > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2025/0086091 A1 - Document ID: US20250086091A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 18/829,975 - Filed: 2024-09-10 - Published: 2025-03-13 - Earliest claimed: 2023-09-11 - Assignees: LabScale Technologies, Inc. - Applicants: LabScale Technologies, Inc. - Inventors: David Tse; Scott Vail; Huacong Cai; Raika Qawam; Craig Griffin - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20250086091A1 ## CPC - G06F 11/3466: {Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring} - G06F 11/3688: {for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites} - G06F: ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING (computer systems based on specific computational models G06N) ## Abstract A test automation system for efficiently testing a wide range of devices, including embedded devices, IoT devices, mobile devices, and edge AI devices, is disclosed. The system employs a unique architecture and technical solutions to overcome limitations of existing testing platforms. It provides a comprehensive and flexible testing solution by incorporating modular components. The system includes a device integration package (DIP) that enables the system to communicate with and test any type of device. The system enables efficient management of diverse device types, streamlined test case creation and execution, and intelligent analysis of test results. Through its innovative design, the test automation system addresses the technical challenges associated with testing heterogeneous devices, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the testing process. The system's adaptability and scalability make it suitable for testing a wide range of devices in various industries, including telecommunications, automotive, and consumer electronics. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A computer implemented method for device testing and management, the computer implemented method comprising: defining a device integration package (DIP) that enables communication between the test automation system and the plurality of devices, the DIP including: a set of APIs that define a technical interface between the test automation system and the plurality of devices, the set of APIs being device-agnostic and configured to establish communication with the plurality of devices; and a configuration specification that defines how the test automation system interacts with each of the plurality of devices using the set of APIs; providing a cross-platform software agent to each of the plurality of devices or to a host connected to each of the plurality of devices; establishing communication between a backend system and the plurality of devices using the DIP; distributing test jobs across the plurality of devices using a job scheduler; receiving, at the backend system, test results and/or performance metrics collected by the software agent; processing and aggregating, at the backend system, the test results and/or performance metrics in real-time; and providing, for display on a user device, the test results and/or performance metrics. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the software agent is operable to: execute test jobs on each of the plurality of devices; monitor a status of each of the plurality of devices; and collect test results and performance metrics from each of the plurality of devices. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the job scheduler is operable to optimize allocation of the test jobs to the plurality of devices based on one or more technical criteria. ### Claim 4 (depends on 3) The computer implemented method according to claim 3, further comprising dynamically adjusting the allocation of the test jobs based on real-time monitoring of the status of the test jobs and the plurality of devices. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, grouping the plurality of devices based on one or more technical criteria using device pooling techniques. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) The computer implemented method according to claim 5, wherein the device pooling techniques comprise: automatically discover and configure the plurality of devices; and monitor the status and availability of the plurality of devices in real-time. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the set of APIs defined in the DIP includes APIs for: initiating communication between the test automation system and each of the plurality of devices; sending commands and data from the test automation system to each of the plurality of devices; and receiving data, including the test results and performance metrics, from each of the plurality of devices. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the software agent is operable to be executed on a plurality of different operating systems. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein distributing test jobs across the plurality of devices using the job scheduler comprises optimizing allocation of the test jobs to the plurality of devices based on one or more of: hardware capabilities of each of the plurality of devices; software configurations of each of the plurality of devices; and network connectivity of each of the plurality of devices. ### Claim 10 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein distributing test jobs across the plurality of devices using the job scheduler comprises dynamically adjusting allocation of the test jobs based on one or more of: real-time performance metrics of the plurality of devices; real-time status of the test jobs; and real-time availability of the plurality of devices. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, further comprising automatically discovering and configuring lab equipment connected to the plurality of devices; and controlling the lab equipment connected to the plurality of devices based on the test jobs being executed. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein providing the test results and/or performance metrics comprises generating interactive reports and visualizations based on the test results and performance metrics collected from the plurality of devices, the reports and visualizations being updated in real-time as new data is processed and aggregated by the backend system. ### Claim 13 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein processing and aggregating the test results and/or performance metrics comprises analyzing the test results and performance metrics in real-time to detect anomalies and identify potential issues with the plurality of devices and/or the test jobs. ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein establishing communication comprises establishing communication between a backend system and the software agent via at least one of Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTTS) protocol and HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) protocol. ### Claim 15 (depends on 1) The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein establishing communication comprises establishing communication between the software agent and a target device via the DIP. ### Claim 16 A computing system for device testing and management, the computing system comprising: at least one computing processor; and memory comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one computing processor, enable the computing system to: define a device integration package (DIP) that enables communication between the test automation system and the plurality of devices, the DIP including: a set of APIs that define a technical interface between the test automation system and the plurality of devices, the set of APIs being device-agnostic and configured to establish communication with the plurality of devices; and a configuration specification that defines how the test automation system interacts with each of the plurality of devices using the set of APIs; provide a cross-platform software agent to each of the plurality of devices or to a host connected to each of the plurality of devices; establish communication between a backend system and the plurality of devices using the DIP; distribute test jobs across the plurality of devices using a job scheduler; receive, at the backend system, test results and/or performance metrics collected by the software agent; process and aggregate, at the backend system, the test results and/or performance metrics in real-time; and provide, for display on a user device, the test results and/or performance metrics. ### Claim 17 A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that when executed by a processor enable the processor to: define a device integration package (DIP) that enables communication between the test automation system and the plurality of devices, the DIP including: a set of APIs that define a technical interface between the test automation system and the plurality of devices, the set of APIs being device-agnostic and configured to establish communication with the plurality of devices; and a configuration specification that defines how the test automation system interacts with each of the plurality of devices using the set of APIs; provide a cross-platform software agent to each of the plurality of devices or to a host connected to each of the plurality of devices; establish communication between a backend system and the plurality of devices using the DIP; distribute test jobs across the plurality of devices using a job scheduler; receive, at the backend system, test results and/or performance metrics collected by the software agent; process and aggregate, at the backend system, the test results and/or performance metrics in real-time; and provide, for display on a user device, the test results and/or performance metrics.