Method and device for detecting a defect using ultrasound
OwnerSébastien PINSON, Cédric PAYAN +1inventors
InventorsSébastien PINSON, Cédric PAYAN, Mickael BOINET
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
OwnerSébastien PINSON, Cédric PAYAN +1inventors
InventorsSébastien PINSON, Cédric PAYAN, Mickael BOINET
Estimating the term…
A method for detecting a defect in a region of interest within a part to be tested includes the step of, for a reference part identical to the part to be tested but free from defects, determining a set of resonant modes each defining: a resonant frequency of the reference part, considering that the modulus of elasticity of the reference part is constant, and a field of mechanical stresses on and/or in the reference part that are generated when the reference part resonates at the resonant frequency. The method includes selecting the resonant mode, referred to as “optimum resonant mode”, that generates, in the region of interest, a maximum mechanical stress and determining a loading mode, referred to as “optimum” loading mode, that primarily activates the optimum resonant mode, a loading mode defining at least an excitation wave, an injection zone where the excitation wave is injected into the reference part, and an output zone where an output wave resulting from the excitation wave passing through from the injection zone to the output zone is picked up. The method includes carrying out nonlinear resonant spectrometry analysis based on the optimum loading mode, so as to determine a nonlinearity parameter for each of the part to be tested and reference part and classifying the part to be tested on the basis of the difference between the nonlinearity parameters for the part to be tested and for the reference part.”
A method for detecting a defect in a region of interest within a part to be tested, said method comprising the following successive steps:
The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the volume of the region of interest is less than 0.2 times and greater than 0.01 times the volume of the reference part.
The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein, in step d), the nonlinearity parameter of the part to be tested is compared with a threshold determined based on the nonlinearity parameter of the reference part, and the part to be tested is then classified on the basis of the difference between the nonlinearity parameter of the part to be tested and the threshold.
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.