# US 2022/0044142 A1 · Quantum computing unit with majorana modes

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 2022/0044142 A1
- Document ID: US20220044142A1
- Status: Published application
- Kind: A1
- Application number: 17/396,151
- Filed: 2021-08-06
- Published: 2022-02-10
- Earliest claimed: 2020-08-06
- Assignees: Universität Hamburg; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Applicants: Universitat Hamburg; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Ucas)
- Inventors: Thore Posske; Ching-Kai Chiu; Michael Thorwart
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20220044142A1

## CPC

- G06N 10/00: Quantum computing, i.e. information processing based on quantum-mechanical phenomena
- G06N 10/40: Physical realisations or architectures of quantum processors or components for manipulating qubits, e.g. qubit coupling or qubit control
- H10N 60/20: Permanent superconducting devices
- G06N 10/20: Models of quantum computing, e.g. quantum circuits or universal quantum computers
- H10N 60/128: {having three or more electrodes, e.g. transistor-like structures}
- H10N 60/85: Superconducting active materials
- G06N: COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- H10N: ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR

## Abstract

The present invention relates to a quantum computing unit comprising a superconducting substrate or other superconducting component, at least three outer Majorana modes, and at least one inner Majorana mode, wherein the at least three outer Majorana modes are located along an outer perimeter, and wherein the at least one inner Majorana mode is located within the outer perimeter. This spatial configuration of the four participating Majorana modes allows to control the time-dependent coupling between the respective Majorana modes. The related quantum gates can be performed perfectly in a finite time, preferably with a frequency of up to several GHz. These include the braiding gate, the π/8 magic phase gate, the π/12 phase gate, and, for multi-qubit systems, the CNOT gate. The robustness of the mechanism guarantees that for special times the quantum gate is conducted the quantum gate is perfectly realized. This property is independent of material specific parameters. Hence, the behavior can be expected in all systems where Majorana zero modes appear in the center of Abrikosov vortices, in particular, not only in FeTeSe, which we consider as an example.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A quantum computing unit comprising a superconducting substrate, at least three outer Majorana modes, and at least one inner Majorana mode,
wherein the at least three outer Majorana modes are located along an outer perimeter, and
wherein the at least one inner Majorana mode is located within the outer perimeter at least proximal to the superconducting substrate.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1,
wherein the at least three outer Majorana modes are located along the outer perimeter at least proximal to the superconducting substrate.

### Claim 3 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, further comprising a network of one-dimensional topological superconductors,
wherein the at least three outer Majorana modes are located along the outer perimeter on the one-dimensional topological superconductors and spatially separated from the superconducting substrate.

### Claim 4 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein the at least three outer Majorana modes are equidistantly arranged.

### Claim 5 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein one Majorana mode is located within an equilateral triangle which is formed by three Majorana modes out of the plurality of outer Majorana modes.

### Claim 6 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein the center of the inner Majorana mode is arranged in the center of a circular outer perimeter.

### Claim 7 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein the outer Majorana modes and the inner Majorana mode are moved relative to each other such that the inner Majorana mode moves relative to the outer Majorana modes along a defined path proximal to the center of the outer perimeter.

### Claim 8 (depends on 7)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 7, wherein the inner Majorana mode moves relative to the outer Majorana modes along a defined path proximal to the center of the outer perimeter in a defined time.

### Claim 9 (depends on 7)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 7, wherein the outer Majorana modes and the inner Majorana mode are moved relative to each other along a defined path non-adiabatically in a defined finite time.

### Claim 10 (depends on 7)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 7, wherein the defined path is approximately along arcs of circles with defined radii that connect corners of an equilateral triangle within the outer perimeter of the outer Majorana modes.

### Claim 11 (depends on 7)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 7, wherein the defined path is approximately along a symmetrical half of an outer contour formed by arcs of circles with defined radii that connect corners of an equilateral triangle.

### Claim 12 (depends on 7)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 7, wherein the defined path is approximately along a symmetrical third of an outer contour formed by arcs of circles with defined radii that connect corners of an equilateral triangle.

### Claim 13 (depends on 7)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 7, wherein the movement of the inner Majorana mode relative to the outer Majorana modes along the defined path changes a distance of the inner Majorana mode to at least one of the outer Majorana modes, wherein the change of the distance results in a change of hybridization of the inner Majorana mode with the at least one of the outer Majorana modes.

### Claim 14 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein a material of the superconducting substrate is FeTexSe1-x.

### Claim 15 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein a material of the first superconducting substrate is FeTe0.55Se0.45.

### Claim 16 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein a motion of the inner Majorana mode relative to the superconducting substrate is caused by the tip of a scanning tunneling microscope or the cantilever of an atomic force microscope.

### Claim 17 (depends on 3)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 3, wherein a motion of the outer Majorana modes relative to the superconducting substrate is caused by applying an electric field.

### Claim 18 (depends on 3)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 3, wherein a motion of the outer Majorana modes relative to the superconducting substrate is caused by changing a magnetic field or the magnetization of at least a part of the quantum computing unit.

### Claim 19 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein a hybridization of a pair of Majorana modes is altered by at least one of changing the size of Majorana modes or manipulating an area in-between a pair of Majorana modes with electromagnetic fields or magnetic and nonmagnetic adatoms.

### Claim 20 (depends on 1)

The quantum computing unit according to claim 1, wherein the execution of a gate in the quantum computing unit operates without measurements of a state of the quantum computing unit.

### Claim 21

A quantum computing array comprising a plurality of quantum computing units, each of the plurality of quantum computing units comprising:
a superconducting substrate, at least three outer Majorana modes, and at least one inner Majorana mode,
wherein the at least three outer Majorana modes are located along an outer perimeter, and
wherein the at least one inner Majorana mode is located within the outer perimeter at least proximal to the superconducting substrate.

### Claim 22 (depends on 21)

The quantum computing array of claim 21, wherein the superconducting substrate of each of the quantum computing units is a common superconducting substrate so that the outer Majorana modes and the inner Majorana modes of the respective quantum computing units are arranged with respect to the same superconducting substrate.

### Claim 23 (depends on 21)

The quantum computing array of claim 21, wherein adjacent quantum computing units share a common outer Majorana mode.

### Claim 24 (depends on 21)

The quantum computing array of claim 21, wherein each two of the outer Majorana modes of six quantum computing units out of the plurality of quantum computing units are arranged in a hexagon, wherein adjacent quantum computing units share a common outer Majorana mode.

### Claim 25 (depends on 21)

The quantum computing array of claim 21, wherein the outer Majorana modes of the plurality of quantum computing units are arranged in a pattern corresponding to medians/centers of sides of a honeycomb structure.

### Claim 26 (depends on 21)

The quantum computing array of claim 21, wherein six Majorana modes are manipulated by seven consecutive braiding gates to realize a CNOT quantum gate, where the Majorana modes are labeled from 1 to 6 arbitrarily, and the braiding gates are applied to the Majorana pairs 2 and 3, 3 and 4, 4 and 5, 3 and 4, 2 and 3 in that order and afterwards to 3 and 4 as well as 6 and 1 in arbitrary order.

### Claim 27 (depends on 21)

The quantum computing array of claim 21, further comprising a second superconducting material grown onto the common superconducting substrate, wherein the second superconducting material has formed a grove mesh thereon, wherein the grove mesh surrounds islands of the second superconducting material, wherein the outer Majorana modes are arranged with respect to the superconducting substrate layer in the center of groves of the grove mesh of the second superconducting material.

### Claim 28 (depends on 27)

The quantum computing array of claim 27, wherein the islands have concave bays opposite the respective outer Majorana modes forming a cage for maintaining the location of the respective outer Majorana modes.

### Claim 29 (depends on 27)

The quantum computing array of claim 27, wherein centers of the inner Majorana modes are located at nodes of the grove mesh.

### Claim 30 (depends on 29)

The quantum computing array of claim 29, wherein the islands have concave bays opposite the respective inner Majorana modes forming a cage for limiting a motion range of the respective inner Majorana modes.

### Claim 31 (depends on 27)

The quantum computing array of claim 27, wherein a material of the second superconducting material is a material having a higher critical superconducting temperature than the operating temperature of the quantum computing array.