Pantids for treatment of autoimmune disorders
AssigneeOrpheus Bioscience Inc.
InventorsCohava GELBER, Mark SPEAR, John ABELES
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeOrpheus Bioscience Inc.
InventorsCohava GELBER, Mark SPEAR, John ABELES
Estimating the term…
Checkpoint receptors and their cognate ligands are frequently targeted in autoimmune disorders by B and T cells, wherein these adaptive immune responses are likely to significantly contribute to the underlying immunopathology. A novel technology for the clonal elimination of autoreactive B cells that targets checkpoint receptors and their ligands is described herein. One embodiment of this technology is a checkpoint receptor or ligand extracellular domain molecular chimera with an effector domain, which is capable of inducing B cell apoptosis, necrosis, and/or tolerization/anergization: herein, this technology is referred as PantIds (polyclonal anti-idiotypics). In other embodiments, this technology also includes effector molecular chimeras with immunoregulatory cytokines. Novel apoptotic effectors are also described. Methods for the identification of checkpoint receptor/ligand autoreactive B cell responses, construction of PantIds, and their in vitro and in vivo application are also described.
A PantId molecule for treatment of autoimmune diseases or disorders in which autoreactive B cells respond to immunological checkpoint receptors, immunological checkpoint ligands, and/or immunoregulatory cytokines, said molecule comprising:
-72. (canceled)
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Backward citations are indexed for grants only.
Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
Cytokines; Lymphokines; Interferons: interleukins [IL]
From animals; from humans: receptors; Cell surface antigens; Cell surface determinants
Receptors; Cell surface antigens; Cell surface determinants: immunoglobulin superfamily
Term end not estimated
Autoimmune disorders are characterized by the gradual, and often progressive, decline of tolerogenesis and tolerogenic mechanisms that normally preclude adaptive immune responses to endogenous host proteins. During normal B and T cell development, autoreactive cells are eliminated in the bone marrow and thymus, respectively, creating “central tolerance” to host tissues and proteins. For B cells, expression of high-affinity B cell receptors (BCRs) to cell-surface proteins present in the bone marrow, the location of B cell development, results in apoptosis. Additionally, B cells that respond to ubiquitous soluble ligands are deactivated by anergy. For T cells, a similar process occurs in the thymus, the location of T cell development: T cells whose T cell receptor (TCR) responds with high-affinity to self-antigen peptides presented in MHC-I or MHC-II complexes are also deleted by apoptosis. For T cells with intermediate or low-affinity for said peptide-MHC complexes, these cells may develop into regulatory T cells (Tregs), which help maintain peripheral tolerance; alternatively, these cells may become anergic or undergo apoptosis.
Peripheral tolerance refers to a suite of mechanisms that preclude adaptive immune responses to host proteins outside the central immune system. As afore-mentioned, these include centrally generated Treg cells, which help maintain peripheral tolerance by expressing immunosuppressive effectors in response to self-antigen peptide-MHC complexes. The mechanisms of Treg suppression are still being defined, but include the secretion of soluble immunosuppressive effectors and cell-contact-specific immunosuppressors. In the former mechanism, TGF-β, IL-10, adenosine (produced by CD39 and CD73), and IL-35 are secreted from Treg cells to create an immunosuppressive milieu that can prevent T and B cell activation, and create tolerogenic APCs1. In cell contact mechanisms, CTLA-4, PD-L1, LAG-3, membrane-bound TGF-β, and perforin and granzymes contribute to immunosuppression1. Also in the periphery, autoreactive T cells can be apoptosed or converted into peripheral Tregs by tolerogenic APCs, such as BTLA+ dendritic cells2. These peripheral Tregs (pTregs) contributed to peripheral tolerance through many of the mechanism described for central or thymic Tregs (cTregs or tTregs).
An additional mechanism of peripheral tolerance is the general requirement for costimulation for T cell activation. When T cells engage their cognate antigen as peptide-MHC complex, there are two likely outcomes, depending on the presence of costimulation: in the presence of costimulatory agonist, such as CD80 or CD86 binding to T cell-expressed CD28, the T cell becomes activated, resulting in proliferation and the engagement of effector functions; in the alternate case, where costimulation is absent or when T cells receive inhibitory signals in lieu of or in combination with costimulatory signals, the T cells may undergo apoptosis, anergization, or conversion into pTreg. For B cells, a similar costimulation requirement exists for T cell-dependent B cell activation, wherein T cell-expressed CD40L must bind to B cell-expressed CD40 for B cell activation. While these canonical modalities of co-stimulation (e.g. CD28 and CD40) are the best described, additional co-stimulators and co-inhibitors have been recently elucidated: such receptors and their ligands, which cumulatively determine the outcome of antigen engagement, are referred to as immune checkpoint receptor or ligands: currently, these immunologic checkpoints include 15 signaling axes (FIG. 1).
FIG. 1: Depiction of immunologic checkpoint receptors and their ligands. T cells receive a primary signal, depicted as “Signal 1,” when MHC-I or MHC-II:peptide complexes bind the T cell receptor (TCR). This signal primes the T cells for activation, anergy, or apoptosis. However, the fate of the T cell is ultimately determined by specific combinations of stimulatory and inhibitory immunological checkpoint receptor signaling, which can bias the T cell response towards one of these 3 outcomes.
FIGS. 2 A and 2 B: Two instantiations of PantId technology. FIG. 2A provides a DNA fragment map of a PD-L1-FasL covalent molecular chimera. FIG. 2B provides maps of two DNA fragments separately encoding PD-L1 and FasL as molecular chimeras with cognate heterodimerization domains. In some embodiments the PantIds from FIG. 2B are co-transfected into mammalian cells after cloning into expression constructs for the production of PD-L1-CC-BN4:FasL-CC-AN4 heterodimers. This achieves the same therapeutic functionality of (A), but with simpler gene synthesis, cloning, and in vitro characterization.
FIGS. 3 A and 3 B: Plasmid maps of PD-L1-FasL molecular chimera fragment, and cloned into lentivector pLenti-C-Myc-DDK-IRES-Puro. FIG. 3 A depicts a PD-L1-FasL molecular chimera fragment with terminal restriction sites, which allow cloning into pLenti-C-Myc-DDK-IRES-Puro. FIG. 3 B provides a plasmid map of a final pLenti-C-PD-L1-FasL-IRES-Puro vector, which would be used as both an expression vector, and as a lentivector for lentiviral transduction of producer cells.
In one embodiment, this disclosure relates use of PantIda as therapeutics for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, characterized by autoreactive B cells which exhibit responsiveness to immunologic checkpoint receptors, or their ligands, or immunoregulatory cytokines.
Although the mechanism of self-tolerance and autoimmunity is poorly understood for most autoimmune diseases, there are rare examples where the mechanism of initial tolerance is well characterized. For example, in Coxscackievirus B-associated myocarditis3 the initial viral infection is followed by inflammatory sequelae involving the myocardium and pericardium: this is associated with mononuclear cell infiltration, antibodies to cardiac actin and myosin, and associated CD4 T cells responses, which promote the clinical presentation of myocarditis3. In this example, Coxscackievirus-associated antigens molecularly mimic cardiac myosin and actin, and the resultant T and B cell responses continue in the absence of viral infection due to the capacity of cardiac myosin and actin to activate these autoreactive T and B cells. Similarly, in streptococcal-induced rheumatic heart disease, adaptive immune responses to streptococcal M protein cross-react with cardiac myosin and actin, resulting in a similar immunopathology4,5. Of note, these pathogen-associated autoimmune conditions are typically acute, and therefore, as recognized herein, other underlying predispositions towards autoimmunity likely coincide with such instigating stimuli to induce chronic clinical autoimmune diseases.
As such, during the initial breakdown in self-tolerance, molecular mimicry between a pathogen's protein and a host protein can promote T and B cell reactivity to host proteins. More generally, the presence of alternate inflammatory stimuli in endogenous host tissues can result in aberrant T and B cell responses to these tissues. These inflammatory stimuli can lead to the expression of immunologic checkpoint co-stimulators that bypass one of the pivotal mechanisms of peripheral tolerance—the requirement for co-stimulation. More broadly, the initial inflammatory state that leads to checkpoint co-stimulator expression is not necessarily pathogen-derived, and could be caused by commensal bacteria, tissue injury, radiation, or chemical exposure, which can promote inflammation through pathogen-associated molecular pattern receptors (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular pattern receptors (DAMPs). Alternatively, exposures to haptens, which covalently couple to host proteins and render them immunogenic, could lead to autoimmune responses in the presence of co-stimulation.