# US 2018/0024550 A1 · Method and system for controlling remotely piloted aircraft > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2018/0024550 A1 - Document ID: US20180024550A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 15/701,521 - Filed: 2017-09-12 - Published: 2018-01-25 - Earliest claimed: 2016-04-22 - Assignees: Sharper Shape Oy - Applicants: Sharper Shape Oy - Inventors: Tero Heinonen; Atte Korhonen - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20180024550A1 ## CPC - G05D 1/226: Communication links with the remote-control arrangements - G08G 5/26: Transmission of traffic-related information between aircraft and ground stations - B64C 39/024: {of the remote controlled vehicle type, i.e. RPV} - G05D 1/0022: {characterised by the communication link (data switching networks in general H04L12/00)} - G08G 5/21: located onboard the aircraft - G08G 5/22: located on the ground - G08G 5/55: for a single aircraft - H04B 7/18506: {Communications with or from aircraft, i.e. aeronautical mobile service} - B64U 2201/10: autonomous, i.e. by navigating independently from ground or air stations, e.g. by using inertial navigation systems [INS] - B64U 2201/20: Remote controls - G08G 5/57: for unmanned aircraft - G05D: SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES - G08G: TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS (guiding railway traffic, ensuring the safety of railway traffic B61L; arrangement of road signs or traffic signals E01F9/00; radar or analogous systems, sonar systems, lidar systems specially adapted for traffic control G01S13/91, G01S15/88, G01S17/88; {radar or analogous systems, sonar systems, lidar systems specially adapted for anti-collision purposes G01S13/93, G01S15/93, G01S17/93}) - B64C: AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS - H04B: TRANSMISSION - B64U: UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES [UAV]; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR ## Abstract Disclosed are a method and a system for modifying flight parameters of a remotely piloted aircraft. The remotely piloted aircraft includes a clock, at least one radio receiver and at least one radio transmitter for communicating with at least one radio transmitter of a ground station, via at least one radio communication network. The method includes analysing a communication between the remotely piloted aircraft and the ground station, such as calculating a communication quality. The method also includes modifying at least one flight parameter based on the calculated communication quality and pre-loaded instructions. The pre-loaded instructions comprise at least one threshold value of the communication quality and allowed flight parameters. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method for modifying flight parameters of a remotely piloted aircraft, wherein the remotely piloted aircraft comprises: a clock; at least one radio receiver and at least one radio transmitter for communicating with at least one radio transmitter of a ground station, via at least one radio communication network, which ground station is equipped with a clock; and a controller for controlling movements of the remotely piloted aircraft using flight parameters; the method comprising: the remotely piloted aircraft analysing a communication between the remotely piloted aircraft and the ground station by calculating a communication quality; and the remotely piloted aircraft modifying at least one flight parameter based on the calculated communication quality and pre-loaded instructions, wherein the pre-loaded instructions comprise at least one threshold value of the communication quality and allowed flight parameters. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) A method according to claim 1, wherein the allowed flight parameters comprise one or more of regulatory rules, spatial coordinates, environmental conditions and operational parameters of the remotely piloted aircraft. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) A method according to claim 1, wherein the communication originates from the ground station. ### Claim 4 (depends on 3) A method according to claim 3, wherein the communication originating from the ground station comprises at least one flight control command. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) A method according to claim 1, wherein the communication quality is calculated as a function of at least two of: bit error ratio (BER) of the communication, signal strength of the communication, bandwidth of the communication, latency of the communication; number of available neighbour cells for the remotely piloted aircraft, signal strength of the available neighbour cells. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) A method according to claim 5, wherein the communication comprises a timestamp and the latency of the communication is calculated based on the timestamp. ### Claim 7 (depends on 5) A method according to claim 5, wherein the latency of the communication comprises a transmission time of at least one flight control command from the ground station to the remotely piloted aircraft and an analysis time of the communication from the ground station to the remotely piloted aircraft by the remotely piloted aircraft. ### Claim 8 (depends on 5) A method according to claim 5, wherein the latency of the communication comprises a transmission time of a communication from the remotely piloted aircraft to the ground station, a processing time of the communication from the remotely piloted aircraft to the ground station by the ground station, a transmission time of a reply communication from the ground station to the remotely piloted aircraft, and an analysis time of the reply communication by the remotely piloted aircraft. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1, further comprising synchronising the clock of the remotely piloted aircraft with the clock of the ground station. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) A method according to claim 9, wherein synchronising the clocks is carried out during flight start procedure. ### Claim 11 (depends on 9) A method according to claim 9, wherein the clock of the remotely piloted aircraft and the clock of the ground station are satellite signal clocks. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) A method according to claim 1, wherein a flight control command is selected from one or more of a flight direction and a flight speed. ### Claim 13 (depends on 1) A method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises the ground station requesting prioritising the communication. ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) A method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises the remotely piloted aircraft initiating an evasive action when no communication is received within a pre-defined period. ### Claim 15 (depends on 14) A method according to claim 14, wherein the remotely piloted aircraft further transmits an evasive signal when initiating the evasive action. ### Claim 16 A system for modifying flight parameters of a remotely piloted aircraft, comprising: a remotely piloted aircraft comprising: a clock; at least one radio receiver and at least one radio transmitter; a controller for controlling movements of the remotely piloted aircraft using flight parameters; and a processor communicably coupled to the clock, the at least one radio receiver, at least one radio transmitter and the controller; a ground station comprising: a clock; and at least one radio receiver and at least one radio transmitter; and at least one radio communication network; wherein the processor is configured to analyse a communication received by the at least one radio receiver by calculating a communication quality, and to instruct the controller to modify at least one flight parameter based on the calculated communication quality and pre-loaded instructions, wherein the pre-loaded instructions comprise at least one threshold value of the communication quality and allowed flight parameters. ### Claim 17 (depends on 16) A system according to claim 16, wherein the remotely piloted aircraft is configured to measure the communication quality of the received communication, and the processor is further configured to analyse the communication quality of the received communication and to instruct the controller to modify at least one flight parameter based on the analysed quality of the received communication. ### Claim 18 (depends on 16) A system according to claim 16, wherein the at least one radio communication network is one or more of a point-to-point radio network, a cellular radio network, and a satellite radio network. ### Claim 19 (depends on 16) A system according to claim 16, wherein the clock of the remotely piloted aircraft and the clock of the ground station are satellite signal clocks. ### Claim 20 (depends on 16) A system according to claim 16, wherein the communication quality is calculated as a function of at least two of: bit error ratio (BER) of the communication, signal strength of the communication, bandwidth of the communication, latency of the communication; number of available neighbour cells for the remotely piloted aircraft, signal strength of the available neighbour cells.