# US 2017/0255995 A1 · Fraud detection system

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 2017/0255995 A1
- Document ID: US20170255995A1
- Status: Published application
- Kind: A1
- Application number: 15/060,128
- Filed: 2016-03-03
- Published: 2017-09-07
- Earliest claimed: 2016-03-03
- Assignees: Blue Global, LLC
- Inventors: Chris Kay; Abdu El-Shaarawy; Keith Linneman; Joel McKee Bowers; Zachary Travis Olroyd
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20170255995A1

## CPC

- G06Q 40/03: Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
- G06Q: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR

## Abstract

A system and method is disclosed for detecting fraudulent loan applications. The system is based upon multiple layers of detection in which anomalies are detected by analyzing the loan data and the borrower browser configuration for anomalies indicative of fraud. A plurality of fraud detection layers are used which when taken together provide a synergistic approach to detecting fraudulent data.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A method of detecting fraudulent loan applications filed on line at a lender's website, the method comprising the steps of:
(a) determining the configuration of the borrower's web browser logged into the lender's website; and
(b) determining if there are anomalies in the identification of the borrower's web browser configuration;
(c) determining if there are anomalies in the data in the loan application; and
(d) flagging the application as fraudulent if any anomalies are detected.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (b) includes the step of determining whether the user agent matches the object detection of the browser configuration and indicating a fraudulent application if the user agent does not match the object detection.

### Claim 3 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (b) includes the step of checking the user agent to determine if it has been used in a predetermined submittals in a row and indicating a fraudulent application if the user agent has been used a predetermined number of times in a row.

### Claim 4 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (c) includes the step of checking the IP address of the browser that is logged into lender's web site and checking whether the IP address has been submitted in the last predetermined number of submittals and indicating an anomaly if only a predetermined number of data fields have changed since the last submittal.

### Claim 5 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (c) includes the step of checking the email address in the loan application and checking whether the email address has been included in the last predetermined number of submittals and indicating an fraudulent application if only a predetermined number of data fields have changed since the last submittal.

### Claim 6 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (c) includes the step of checking the phone number in the loan application and checking whether the phone number has been included in the last predetermined number of submittals and indicating a fraudulent application if only a predetermined number of data fields have changed since the last submittal.

### Claim 7 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (c) includes the step of checking the computer time zone of the browser connected to the lender's website and indicating a fraudulent application for predetermined time zones.

### Claim 8 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (c) includes the step of checking the computer time zone of the browser connected to the lender's website and indicating a fraudulent application if the time zone does not match the time zone of the zip code in the loan application.

### Claim 9 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (c) includes the step of checking the key downs in the submitted application and indicating a fraudulent application if the key downs are less than a predetermined number.

### Claim 10 (depends on 1)

The method as recited in claim 1, wherein step (c) includes the step of creating a fingerprint of one or more characteristics of the browser logged into the lender's website and comparing the fingerprint to previously stored fingerprints and comparing the data of the current loan application with the data in the matching fingerprint and indicating a possible fraudulent application if the data is different.

### Claim 11

A system for detecting fraudulent loan applications filed on line at a lender's website, the system configured to:
(a) determine the configuration of the borrower's web browser logged into the lender's website; and
(b) determine if there are anomalies in the identification of the borrower's web browser configuration;
(c) determine if there are anomalies in the data in the loan application; and
(d) flag the application as fraudulent if any anomalies are detected.