# US 2016/0366165 A1 · System and methods for detecting malicious email transmission

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 2016/0366165 A1
- Document ID: US20160366165A1
- Status: Published application
- Kind: A1
- Application number: 14/495,168
- Filed: 2014-09-24
- Published: 2016-12-15
- Earliest claimed: 2001-08-16
- Assignees: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
- Applicants: The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York
- Inventors: Salvatore J. Stolfo; Eleazar Eskin; Manasi Bhattacharyya; Shlomo Herskop
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20160366165A1

## CPC

- H04L 63/1425: {Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection}
- H04L 51/212: using filtering or selective blocking
- H04L 63/145: {the attack involving the propagation of malware through the network, e.g. viruses, trojans or worms}
- H04L: TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION (arrangements common to telegraphic and telephonic communication H04M)

## Abstract

A system and methods of detecting an occurrence of a violation of an email security policy of a computer system. A model relating to the transmission of prior emails through the computer system is defined which is derived from statistics relating to the prior emails. For selected emails to be analyzed, statistics concerning the selected email are gathered. Such statistics may refer to the behavior or other features of the selected emails, attachments to emails, or email accounts. The determination of whether a violation of an email security policy has occurred is performed by applying the model of prior email transmission to the statistics relating to the selected email. The model may be statistical or probabilistic. A model of prior email transmission may include grouping email recipients into cliques. A determination of a violation of a security policy may occur if email recipients for a particular email are in more than one clique.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A method for monitoring transmission of email through a computer system, said computer system comprising a server and one or more clients having an email account, the method comprising:
(a) gathering statistics relating to transmission behavior of prior emails relating to a first email account on said computer system;
(b) generating a profile relating to the transmission behavior of email relating to said first email account based on said statistics, wherein said profile comprises a histogram of said normal transmission behavior of email through said computer system; and
(c) determining if a violation of email security has occurred by comparing one or more select emails relating to said first email account to said histogram of said not nal transmission behavior.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The method according to claim 1, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails comprises gathering statistics relating to the email addresses of emails sent to said first email account.

### Claim 3 (depends on 1)

The method according to claim 1, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails comprises gathering statistics relating to the email addresses of email sent by said first email account.

### Claim 4 (depends on 1)

The method according to claim 1, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails comprises gathering statistics relating to the number of emails sent by said first email account.

### Claim 5 (depends on 1)

The method according to claim 1, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails comprises gathering statistics relating to the transmission of email between said first email account and one or more additional email accounts.

### Claim 6 (depends on 5)

The method according to claim 5, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails further comprises gathering statistics relating to the number of emails transmitted between said first email account and said one or more additional email accounts.

### Claim 7 (depends on 5)

The method according to claim 5, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails further comprises assigning a unique identifier to each email sent between said first email account and one or more additional email accounts.

### Claim 8 (depends on 1)

The method according to claim 1, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails further comprises assigning a unique identifier to each email sent to said first email account.

### Claim 9 (depends on 1)

The method according to claim 1, wherein gathering statistics relating to the transmission behavior of prior emails further comprises assigning a unique identifier to each email sent by said first email account.

### Claim 10 (depends on 1)

The method according to claim 1, wherein determining if a violation of email security has occurred further comprises generating a histogram of said one or more select emails.

### Claim 11 (depends on 10)

The method according to claim 10, wherein comparing further comprises comparing said histogram of said one or more select emails to said histogram of said normal transmission behavior.

### Claim 12 (depends on 11)

The method according to claim 11, wherein comparing said histogram of said one or more select emails to said histogram of said normal transmission behavior further comprises performing a Mahalanobis distance analysis.

### Claim 13 (depends on 11)

The method according to claim 11, wherein comparing said histogram of said one or more select emails to said histogram of said normal transmission behavior further comprises performing a Kolmogorov-Simironov test.

### Claim 14 (depends on 11)

The method according to claim 11, wherein comparing said histogram of said one or more select emails to said histogram of said normal transmission behavior further comprises performing a Chi-square test.

### Claim 15 (depends on 12)

The method according to claim 12, further comprising setting a threshold value and comparing said histogram difference to said threshold value to determine whether selected email transmission behavior is normal.

### Claim 16 (depends on 13)

The method according to claim 13, further comprising setting a threshold value and comparing said histogram difference to said threshold value to determine whether selected email transmission behavior is no mal.

### Claim 17 (depends on 14)

The method according to claim 14, further comprising setting a threshold value and comparing said histogram difference to said threshold value to determine whether selected email transmission behavior is normal.
