# US 2016/0356111 A1 · Multimodal tool jar > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2016/0356111 A1 - Document ID: US20160356111A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 14/730,203 - Filed: 2015-06-03 - Published: 2016-12-08 - Earliest claimed: 2015-06-03 - Assignees: Baker Hughes Incorporated - Applicants: Baker Hughes Incorporated - Inventors: HOMERO C. CASTILLO; OTTO N. FANINI - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20160356111A1 ## CPC - E21B 31/1135: {Jars with a hydraulic impedance mechanism, i.e. a restriction, for initially delaying escape of a restraining fluid} - E21B 31/107: using impact means for releasing stuck parts, e.g. jars - E21B: EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS ## Abstract Methods and apparatus for alleviating a stuck condition of a tool string, including using a jarring assembly to collide a plurality of impact surfaces together. The collision results in at least a shock wave inducing i) translational motion along the longitudinal axis of the tool string, and ii) motion in at least one other degree of freedom sufficient to alleviate the stuck condition of the tool string, which may be at least one of: i) translational motion along an axis substantially normal to the longitudinal axis, and ii) rotational motion. Methods may include generating at least one test impact load using a jarring assembly; generating movement information from a sensor responsive to the at least one test impact load; and generating further impact loads using the jarring assembly in dependence upon the movement information. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method of releasing a downhole tool string experiencing a stuck condition relative to a borehole intersecting an earth formation, the method comprising: using a jarring assembly comprising a plurality of impact surfaces internal to a tool of the tool string to impart at least one impact load to the stuck tool string by colliding the plurality of impact surfaces together, the at least one impact load resulting in at least a shock wave inducing i) translational motion along the longitudinal axis of the tool string, and ii) motion in at least one other degree of freedom sufficient to alleviate the stuck condition of the tool string. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1 wherein the motion in the at least one other degree of freedom comprises at least one of: i) translational motion along an axis substantially normal to the longitudinal axis, and ii) rotational motion. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the plurality of impact surfaces is asymmetric about the longitudinal axis. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: releasing a mechanical constraint in response to activation of the jarring assembly to cause movement of a first impact surface of the jarring assembly to collide with a second impact surface of the jarring assembly to apply the at least one impact load. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: operating a hydraulic mechanism in response to activation of the jarring assembly to cause movement of a first impact surface of the jarring assembly to collide with a second impact surface of the jarring assembly to apply the impact load. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one impact load comprises a first load component normal to the longitudinal axis and a second load component non-normal to the longitudinal axis, the method comprising using the jarring assembly to impart the load component normal to the longitudinal axis with a first set of impact surfaces of the plurality of impact surfaces and using the jarring assembly to impart the non-normal component of the at least one impact load with a second set of impact surfaces of the plurality of impact surfaces. ### Claim 7 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, comprising imparting the normal component at a different time than the non-normal component. ### Claim 8 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, comprising imparting the normal component substantially simultaneously as the non-normal component. ### Claim 9 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, comprising imparting the normal component at the same axial depth on the tool as the non-normal component. ### Claim 10 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, comprising imparting the normal component at a different axial depth on the tool than the non-normal component. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, comprising imparting a plurality of impact loads on the tool, wherein a first impact load of the plurality of impact loads is at a different axial depth on the tool than a second impact load of the plurality of impact loads. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one impact load is further configured to generate at least one of: i) a component of rotation about the longitudinal axis; and ii) a component of rotation normal to the axis. ### Claim 13 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one impact load is configured to overcome a force normal to the borehole wall resulting from a pressure differential between the borehole and the earth formation. ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the jarring assembly further comprises: an axially traveling member with a first impact surface of the plurality of impact surfaces connected operatively thereto; a second impact surface of the plurality of impact surfaces positioned on another member at an axial distance from the first impact surface; a biasing member urging the axially traveling member to an impact location wherein the first impact surface meets the second impact surface; and a constraint configured to prevent travel of the axially traveling member to the impact location prior to triggering, the constraint further configured to suddenly allow the axially traveling member to freely accelerate toward the impact location upon triggering until the first impact surface and the second impact surface collide; wherein the first impact surface and the second impact surface are oriented to generate the impact load upon collision. ### Claim 15 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, wherein a path of travel of the first impact surface after triggering is helical. ### Claim 16 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, wherein the constraint is triggered by tensioning the biasing member past a threshold tension, and further comprising modifying the threshold tension while the apparatus is downhole. ### Claim 17 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one impact load comprises a plurality of impact loads, and wherein the jarring assembly is configured to impart the plurality of impact loads in sequence. ### Claim 18 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1 further comprising using information from a sensor incorporated in the tool estimate at least one of: i) a jarring parameter, ii) a drilling parameter, iii) a borehole property; and iv) a property of the earth formation. ### Claim 19 A method of releasing a downhole tool string experiencing a stuck condition relative to a borehole intersecting an earth formation, the method comprising: generating at least one test impact load using a jarring assembly; generating movement information from a sensor responsive to the at least one test impact load; generating further impact loads using the jarring assembly in dependence upon the movement information. ### Claim 20 (depends on 19) The method of claim 19, comprising: generating additional movement information from a sensor responsive to the further impact loads; generating additional further impact loads using the jarring assembly in dependence upon the additional movement information. ### Claim 21 (depends on 19) The method of claim 19 wherein generating at least one test impact load using a jarring assembly comprises inducing: i) translational motion along the longitudinal axis of the tool string, and ii) motion in at least one other degree of freedom. ### Claim 22 (depends on 19) The method of claim 19 wherein generating at least one test impact load using a jarring assembly comprises inducing: i) translational motion along an axis substantially normal to the longitudinal axis, and ii) rotational motion.