# US 2015/0146239 A1 · Comparing Planned and Actual Asset Locations > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2015/0146239 A1 - Document ID: US20150146239A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 14/088,548 - Filed: 2013-11-25 - Published: 2015-05-28 - Earliest claimed: 2013-11-25 - Assignees: Lexmark International, Inc. - Applicants: Lexmark International, Inc. - Inventors: John Douglas Anderson; Brent Allen Schanding; Forrest Lane Steely - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20150146239A1 ## CPC - H04W 4/021: Services related to particular areas, e.g. point of interest [POI] services, venue services or geofences - G01S 5/02: using radio waves (using satellite radio beacon systems for determining position G01S19/00) - H04W: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (broadcast communication H04H; communication systems using wireless links for non-selective communication, e.g. wireless extensions H04M1/72) - G01S: RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES ## Abstract A computing device display shows an actual location of an imaging device as configured in a computing system environment. An acceptance zone about a planned location of the imaging device visually conveys to a user whether or not the imaging device exists within a predetermined distance. If not, service level or other agreements specifying the location of the imaging device can be adjusted or the imaging device can be moved into compliance with the agreements. Alerts can be broadcast upon non-compliance or if the imaging device changes location. The display can be configured to show the imaging device with geospatial coordinates, within a building, superimposed on a map, such as a building floor plan, etc. Other embodiments note computing environments, deltas between locations, and various administrative tools. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method of comparing a planned location of an imaging device to an actual location of the imaging device as installed in a computing system environment, comprising: determining the actual location of the imaging device in the computing system environment; generating a map on a computing device display showing the actual location of the imaging device; showing on said map the planned location of the imaging device; and providing on the computing device display a basis for the planned location of the imaging device so that compliance can be determined regarding whether the actual location of the imaging device falls within the basis for the planned location. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further including determining whether said compliance is achieved. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further including calculating a delta between the actual location and the planned location. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the determining the actual location of the imaging device includes determining a geospatial coordinate for the imaging device. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further including displaying an acceptance zone on the map about the planned location of the imaging device in which the actual location of the imaging device can be found to be in said compliance or not. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the generating the map on the computing device display further includes showing a floor plan of a building in which the imaging device is installed. ### Claim 7 (depends on 3) The method of claim 3, further including determining said compliance to see if the actual location of the imaging device exists in a distance less than the calculated delta. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further including broadcasting an alert if the actual location of the imaging device falls outside the basis for the planned location of the imaging device. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further including detecting movement of the imaging device from the actual location to a second location. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The method of claim 9, further including determining compliance whether the second location of the imaging device falls within the basis for the planned location of the imaging device. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further including adjusting the basis for the planned location of the imaging device. ### Claim 12 A method for allowing visual comparison of a planned location of an imaging device to an actual location of the imaging device as configured in a computing system environment, comprising: determining the actual location of the imaging device in the computing system environment; showing the actual location of the imaging device on a computing device display; and showing an acceptance zone about the planned location of the imaging device in which the actual location of the imaging device can be found or not to be in compliance within a predetermined distance of the planned location. ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, further including providing on the computing device display a basis for the planned location of the imaging device so that said compliance can be determined or not. ### Claim 14 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, further including showing on the computing device display the planned location of the imaging device. ### Claim 15 (depends on 14) The method of claim 14, further including showing a map on the computing device display, the map showing both the actual location and the planned location. ### Claim 16 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15, further including showing a floor plan of a building in which the imaging device is configured. ### Claim 17 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, further including broadcasting an alert if the actual location of the imaging device falls outside the acceptance zone. ### Claim 18 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, further including detecting movement of the imaging device from the actual location to a second location and determining whether the second location of the imaging device falls within or not the acceptance zone. ### Claim 19 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, further including calculating a delta between the actual location of the imaging device and the planned location of the imaging device and showing the delta on the computing device display. ### Claim 20 A method of allowing visual comparison of a proposed location of an imaging device to an actual location of the imaging device in a building as configured in a computing system environment, comprising: generating for a user on a computing device display a geospatial location of the actual location of the imaging device in the building; and generating for the user on the computing device display whether the actual location of the imaging device falls within or not an acceptance zone about the proposed location of the imaging device in the building.