# US 2014/0195306 A1 · Enterprise decision management > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2014/0195306 A1 - Document ID: US20140195306A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 14/147,686 - Filed: 2014-01-06 - Published: 2014-07-10 - Earliest claimed: 2013-01-08 - Assignees: International Business Machines Corporation - Applicants: International Business Machines Corporation - Inventors: Jean Michel Bernelas; Steve Demuth; Stephane Mery - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20140195306A1 ## CPC - G06Q 10/0637: Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals - G06F 8/427: {Parsing} - G06F 9/45508: {Runtime interpretation or emulation, e g. emulator loops, bytecode interpretation} - G06Q: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR - G06F: ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING (computer systems based on specific computational models G06N) ## Abstract Embodiments relate to managing and executing interpreted language code. An aspect includes a parser configured to parse controlled language code against both a language grammar and for building an execution model comprising parsed known concepts. Another aspect includes a pattern matching engine configured to match patterns in the controlled language code with a patterns for a new concept. Yet another aspect includes a concept engine configured to create a new concept from the matched pattern and controlled language code and for saving the new concept into an object model and into a language grammar so that current and future parsing errors will not occur when recognizing the new concept. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A system for managing and executing interpreted language code comprising: a parser configured to parse controlled language code against both a language grammar and for building an execution model comprising parsed known concepts; a pattern matching engine configured to match patterns in the controlled language code with a patterns for a new concept; and a concept engine configured to create a new concept from the matched pattern and controlled language code and for saving the new concept into an object model and into a language grammar so that current and future parsing errors will not occur when recognizing the new concept. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein an error during parsing of the language grammar triggers a search to match the error with a new concept. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the interpreted language code comprises rules and actions for making decisions and the system is a decision management system. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, further comprising matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for types of new concepts. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein: the pattern matching engine is configured to match patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for new properties of concepts; and the concept engine is configured to create new properties of a concept from the matched pattern and the controlled language code and saving a property of a concept with a corresponding action into the object model; and further comprising an execution engine configured to execute the concepts and actions in the object model. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) The system of claim 5, wherein the pattern matching engine is configured to match patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for types of new properties. ### Claim 7 A method for managing and executing interpreted language code comprising: parsing controlled language code against a language grammar to build an execution model comprising known concepts; matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for new concepts; creating a new concept from the matched pattern and the controlled language code; and saving the new concept into an object model and into a language grammar so that current and future parsing errors will not occur when recognizing the new concept. ### Claim 8 (depends on 7) The method of claim 7, wherein an error during parsing of the language grammar triggers a search to match the error with a new concept. ### Claim 9 (depends on 7) The method of claim 7, wherein the interpreted language code comprises rules and actions for making decisions. ### Claim 10 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, further comprising matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for types of new concepts. ### Claim 11 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, further comprising: matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for new properties of concepts; creating new properties of a concept from the matched pattern and the controlled language code; and saving a property of a concept with a corresponding action into the object model; and executing the concepts and actions in the object model. ### Claim 12 (depends on 11) The method of claim 11, further comprising matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for types of new properties. ### Claim 13 A computer program product for managing and executing interpreted language code, the computer program product comprising a computer readable medium having computer-readable program code embodied therewith, which when executed by a computer processor, causes the computer processor to implement: parsing controlled language code against a language grammar to build an execution model comprising known concepts; matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for new concepts; creating a new concept from the matched pattern and the controlled language code; and saving the new concept into an object model and into a language grammar so that current and future parsing errors will not occur when recognizing the new concept. ### Claim 14 (depends on 13) The computer program product of claim 13, wherein an error during parsing of the language grammar triggers a search to match the error with a new concept. ### Claim 15 (depends on 13) The computer program product of claim 13, wherein the interpreted language code comprises rules and actions for making decisions. ### Claim 16 (depends on 13) The computer program product of claim 13, further comprising matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for types of new concepts. ### Claim 17 (depends on 13) The computer program product of claim 13, further comprising: matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for new properties of concepts; creating new properties of a concept from the matched pattern and the controlled language code; and saving a property of a concept with a corresponding action into the object model; and executing the concepts and actions in the object model. ### Claim 18 (depends on 17) The computer program product of claim 17, further comprising matching patterns in the controlled language code against patterns for types of new properties.