# US 2014/0192663 A1 · Power Difference Between SCell and PCell in a Carrier Aggregation System > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2014/0192663 A1 - Document ID: US20140192663A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 14/009,915 - Filed: 2012-03-30 - Published: 2014-07-10 - Earliest claimed: 2011-04-06 - Inventors: Claudio Rosa; Petri Vasenkari; Jarkko T. Koskela; Sari Nielsen; Esa Malkamäki; Olli Alanen - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20140192663A1 ## CPC - H04W 24/02: Arrangements for optimising operational condition - H04B 17/354: Adjacent channel leakage power - H04W 52/244: {Interferences in heterogeneous networks, e.g. among macro and femto or pico cells or other sector / system interference [OSI]} - H04W 52/16: Deriving transmission power values from another channel - H04W 52/30: using constraints in the total amount of available transmission power - H04W: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (broadcast communication H04H; communication systems using wireless links for non-selective communication, e.g. wireless extensions H04M1/72) - H04B: TRANSMISSION ## Abstract In accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, a method is disclosed. Determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC. In response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method comprising: determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and in response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1, in which the first CC is one of a primary CC and a secondary CC, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC and the secondary CC. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The method according to claim 2, in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a difference in received or transmitted power between the primary CC and the second CC. ### Claim 4 (depends on 2) The method according to claim 2, in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a power difference needed for the first or the second CC so that reception on the first CC is no longer degraded beyond an image tolerance threshold due to image interference caused by the second CC. ### Claim 5 (depends on 3) The method according to claim 3, in which the quantitative power difference comprises at least one of: RSRP difference; RSRQ difference; and network transmit power difference; and the interference is image interference. ### Claim 6 (depends on 2) The method according to claim 2, the method further comprising: after arranging the UL signaling, one of suspending measurements on the secondary CC or deconfiguring the secondary CC. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1, in which the method is executed by a user equipment and the determining that downlink reception on the first CC is degraded due to interference caused by the second CC is based on an image tolerance threshold specific to the user-equipment. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1, in which the determining that downlink reception on the first CC is degraded due to interference caused by the second CC is based on an absolute threshold provided by the network, the absolute threshold for one of RSRP, RSPQ, CQI or SNIR. ### Claim 9 A method comprising: determining that a power difference among first and second CCs exceeds a tolerance threshold, in which the tolerance threshold is specific for a user equipment; and in response to the determining, arranging uplink signaling to inform a network at least that the tolerance threshold was exceeded. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The method according to claim 9, in which the first CC is one of a primary CC/PCell and a secondary CC/SCell, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC/PCell and the secondary CC/SCell. ### Claim 11 (depends on 10) The method according to claim 10, in which the uplink signaling comprises a bit whose value informs the network that the tolerance threshold was exceeded. ### Claim 12 (depends on 10) The method of claim 10, in which the UL signaling is further arranged to inform the network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and to further identify which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power. ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The method according to claim 12, in which the quantitative power difference comprises at least one of: RSRP difference; RSRQ difference; and network transmit power difference. ### Claim 14 (depends on 9) The method according to claim 9, in which the uplink signaling comprises, for each of the first and second CCs, values of at least one of: measured RSRP, measured RSRQ, calculated transmit power, and CQI. ### Claim 15 (depends on 9) The method according to claim 9, in which the uplink signaling comprises a power change needed for the first or the second CC so that the power difference would no longer exceed the threshold. ### Claim 16 An apparatus, comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory including computer program code the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following: determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and in response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power. ### Claim 17 (depends on 16) The apparatus according to claim 16, in which the first CC is one of a primary CC and a secondary CC, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC and the secondary CC. ### Claim 18 (depends on 17) The apparatus according to claim 17, in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a difference in received or transmitted power between the primary CC and the second CC. ### Claim 19 A computer program, comprising: code for determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and code for arranging, in response to the determining, UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power; when the computer program is run on a processor. ### Claim 20 (depends on 19) The computer program according to claim 19, wherein the computer program is a computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium bearing computer program code embodied therein for use with a computer.