# US 2014/0156621 A1 · Method of and system for conducting personalized federated search and presentation of results therefrom > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2014/0156621 A1 - Document ID: US20140156621A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 14/070,781 - Filed: 2013-11-04 - Published: 2014-06-05 - Earliest claimed: 2010-09-10 - Assignees: Veveo, Inc. - Applicants: Veveo, Inc. - Inventors: Rakesh BARVE; Pankaj GARG; Sashikumar VENKATARAMAN; Murali ARAVAMUDAN; Keyur Vallabhbhai FALDU; Vineet AGARWAL; Apurv ANAND - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20140156621A1 ## CPC - G06F 16/951: Indexing; Web crawling techniques - G06F 16/248: Presentation of query results - G06F 16/9535: Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation - G06F 16/24578: {using ranking} - G06F 16/93: Document management systems - G06F: ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING (computer systems based on specific computational models G06N) ## Abstract The present disclosure provides user-interface methods and systems for submitting search requests to search engines and presenting search results therefrom customized using content preferences learned about a user, comprising sending query information to at least two search engines, including a query identifying desired content, and user information, including context information describing the environment in which the query information is being sent, and a user signature representing content preferences learned about the user; receiving at least one set of a search result and auxiliary information from the at least one search engine in response to sending the query information, including information describing attributes of the search result that led to the search result being chosen by the at least one search engine; ordering the at least one search result based at least in part on the auxiliary information; and presenting the ordered search results to the user. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A computer-implemented user interface method of presenting results of a search customized using content preferences learned about a user, the method comprising: receiving a user input action for interacting with an application on a user device; in response to receiving the user input action, sending query information to at least two search engines, the query information including user information, the user information including (i) context information describing the environment in which the user input action was received, the context information adapted into a syntax understandable by at least one of the at least two search engines, and (ii) a user signature representing content preferences learned about the user; receiving at least one set of search results and auxiliary information from at least one of the at least two search engines in response to sending the query information, the auxiliary information of the set including information describing attributes of the search result of the set that led to the search result being chosen by the at least one of the at least two search engines; ordering the at least one search result based at least in part on the auxiliary information; and presenting the ordered search results to the user. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the auxiliary information includes at least one of: an identification of a dataspace associated with the corresponding search result, an identification of a search engine that provided the search result, a relevance list, wherein a relevance list element represents a set of an attribute of the search result and a value indicating the relevance of the attribute to at least one of the query and the user information, a textual location list, wherein a textual location list element represents the location of search terms from the query information in fields provided by the search result, a disjunction indicator list, wherein a disjunction indicator list element represents whether a corresponding search term from the query information matched the search result, a spelling correction list, wherein a spelling correction list element represents whether a corresponding search term from the query information exactly matched a substring of fields from the search result, and wherein the spelling correction list element represents a value indicating the distance between the corresponding search term and the matched substring, if a match was based on an applied spelling correction, a complete word match list, wherein a complete word match list element represents whether a corresponding search term from the query information exactly matched a full word of fields from the search result based on an applied spelling correction, a field match list, wherein a field match list element represents whether the search query information matched all words of a field of the search result, a location proximity indicator representing a value for the distance from the search result to a specified location, and a location query-place indicator representing whether a part of the search query information matched an entity recognized to be a place having a location. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the ordering is further based on search engine general information, the search engine general information describing the corresponding search engine. ### Claim 4 (depends on 3) The method of claim 3, wherein the ordering based on the search engine general information is based on a comparison between the search engine general information and the user information. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4, wherein the search engine general information includes at least one of a measure of importance relative to other search engines of reordering criteria of different metacontent descriptor fields, a measure of importance relative to other search engines of spelling correction matches, a measure of importance relative to other search engines of disjunction indicators, relative interpretation of distance compared to other search engines for location indicators, whether the mere existence of a search result from the at least one search engine indicates that the search result should be presented as important, and the relative importance compared to other search engines of complete word matches. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting the search engines to which the query information is sent based on a measure of the use by the user of the corresponding search engines. ### Claim 7 (canceled) ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the content preferences learned about the user include at least one of a user profile, user behavior, and user activity. ### Claim 9 A system presenting results of a search customized using content preferences learned about a user, the system comprising: a non-transitory computer memory store comprising instructions in computer readable form that when executed cause a computer system to receive a user input action for interacting with an application on a user device; in response to receiving the user input action, send query information to at least two search engines, the query information including user information, the user information including (i) context information describing the environment in which the user input action was received, the context information adapted into a syntax understandable by at least one of the at least two search engines, and (ii) a user signature representing content preferences learned about the user; receive at least one set of search results and auxiliary information from at least one of the at least two search engines in response to sending the query information, the auxiliary information of the set including information describing attributes of the search result of the set that led to the search result being chosen by the at least one of the at least two search engines; order the at least one search result based at least in part on the auxiliary information; and present the ordered search results to the user. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The system of claim 9, wherein the auxiliary information includes at least one of: an identification of a dataspace associated with the corresponding search result, an identification of a search engine that provided the search result, a relevance list, wherein a relevance list element represents a set of an attribute of the search result and a value indicating the relevance of the attribute to at least one of the query and the user information, a textual location list, wherein a textual location list element represents the location of search terms from the query information in fields provided by the search result, a disjunction indicator list, wherein a disjunction indicator list element represents whether a corresponding search term from the query information matched the search result, a spelling correction list, wherein a spelling correction list element represents whether a corresponding search term from the query information exactly matched a substring of fields from the search result, and wherein the spelling correction list element represents a value indicating the distance between the corresponding search term and the matched substring, if a match was based on an applied spelling correction, a complete word match list, wherein a complete word match list element represents whether a corresponding search term from the query information exactly matched a full word of fields from the search result based on an applied spelling correction, a field match list, wherein a field match list element represents whether the search query information matched all words of a field of the search result, a location proximity indicator representing a value for the distance from the search result to a specified location, and a location query-place indicator representing whether a part of the search query information matched an entity recognized to be a place having a location. ### Claim 11 (depends on 9) The system of claim 9, wherein the ordering is further based on search engine general information, the search engine general information describing the corresponding search engine. ### Claim 12 (depends on 11) The system of claim 11, wherein the ordering based on the search engine general information is based on a comparison between the search engine general information and the user information. ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The system of claim 12, wherein the search engine general information includes at least one of a measure of importance relative to other search engines of reordering criteria of different metacontent descriptor fields, a measure of importance relative to other search engines of spelling correction matches, a measure of importance relative to other search engines of disjunction indicators, relative interpretation of distance compared to other search engines for location indicators, whether the mere existence of a search result from the at least one search engine indicates that the search result should be presented as important, and the relative importance compared to other search engines of complete word matches. ### Claim 14 (depends on 9) The system of claim 9, the computer memory store further comprising instructions that cause the computer system to select the search engines to which the query information is sent based on a measure of the use by the user of the corresponding search engines. ### Claim 15 (canceled) ### Claim 16 (depends on 9) The system of claim 9, wherein the content preferences learned about the user include at least one of a user profile, user behavior, and user activity. ### Claim 17 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one set of search results includes at least one content item. ### Claim 18 (depends on 17) The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one content item includes at least one of a contact, device application, music item, web site address, uniform resource locator (URL) for web browsing, business listing, and ring tone. ### Claim 19 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one of the at least two search engines includes a recommendation engine, the recommendation engine recommending search results based on at least a portion of the user information. ### Claim 20 (depends on 9) The system of claim 9, wherein the at least one set of search results includes at least one content item. ### Claim 21 (depends on 20) The system of claim 20, wherein the at least one content item includes at least one of a contact, device application, music item, web site address, uniform resource locator (URL) for web browsing, business listing, and ring tone. ### Claim 22 (depends on 9) The system of claim 9, wherein the at least one of the at least two search engines includes a recommendation engine, the recommendation engine recommending search results based on at least a portion of the user information.