# US 2014/0156356 A1 · Systems and methods for determining effectiveness of interviews and meetings > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 2014/0156356 A1 - Document ID: US20140156356A1 - Status: Published application - Kind: A1 - Application number: 13/706,162 - Filed: 2012-12-05 - Published: 2014-06-05 - Earliest claimed: 2012-12-05 - Inventors: Michael Olivier; Rachel Sanders; Alex Vauthey; Evan Brynne - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20140156356A1 ## CPC - G06Q 10/06398: {Performance of employee with respect to a job function} - G06Q: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR ## Abstract A system for scheduling interviews includes an interviewer database and a calendar database. Interviewers are selected as a function of one or more modules of questions that are associated with each of the interviewers, and an interview schedule is generated for a job candidate from the selected interviewers. The system can also schedule and invite people to meetings based on their calendar availability and the skills, characteristics, or attributes associated with potential meeting attendees. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A system comprising: a computer processor configured to: receive data relating to a plurality of job interviews; store the data in a computer storage device; and analyze the data relating to the plurality of job interviews to determine an effectiveness of an interviewer and an effectiveness of an interview process; wherein the computer processor is configured to compare job candidate data for all job candidates who successfully passed all interviews, all job candidates who were rejected, and job performance data of the job candidates who were hired. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to: receive job performance data relating to a person who has been through the interview process and who has been hired; and analyze the job performance data and data relating to the person collected during the interview process to determine the effectiveness of the interviewer and the effectiveness of the interview process. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The system of claim 2, wherein the data relating to the person collected during the interview process comprise an answer provided by the person during the interview process to a question or module of questions posed during the interview process; and wherein the computer processor is configured to determine an effectiveness of the question or module of questions as a function of job performance data for the person; wherein the module of questions relates to a particular job type or job track. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the data relating to the plurality of job interviews are received contemporaneously with the conducting of the job interviews. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the data relating to the plurality of job interviews comprise job candidate data, an identification of a job type, an identification of questions used in the interview process, a model response to the question used in the interview process, and an actual response provided by the job candidate during the interview process. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the interview process comprises a web-based user interface, and the data relating to the plurality of job interviews comprise snapshots of content of the web-based interface captured during the interview process on a periodic basis; and wherein the snapshots comprise a multistep answer of a person to a computer programming problem presented to the person during an interview. ### Claim 7 (depends on 6) The system of claim 6, wherein the snapshots comprise different stages of an answer to a question provided by a job candidate, and a timestamp associated with each snapshot. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to: receive input from an interviewer indicating that the interviewer would like to be updated regarding a status of a job candidate throughout the interview process; and provide an update to the interviewer regarding the status of the job candidate. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to: receive comments and ratings for a job candidate from the interviewer; analyze the comments and ratings; and determine a relationship between the comments from the interviewer and the ratings from the interviewer to verify that the comments and ratings are consistent. ### Claim 10 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to: receive comments and ratings for a job candidate from an interviewer; after the job candidate has been hired as an employee, receive data relating to job performance of the job candidate; and determine a rating for the interviewer as a function of the comments received from the interviewer, ratings received from the interviewer, and the job performance data of the job candidate. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to generate an ordered list of a plurality of interviewers as a function of ratings calculated for each of the interviewers. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to generate a report highlighting overdue tasks in the interview process. ### Claim 13 (canceled) ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to display on a display unit information relating to the interviewer, the information comprising an active status of the interviewer, the modules of questions for which the interviewer is qualified, a number of interviews conducted by interviewer during a time period, an average rating of job candidates provided by the interviewer; and a standard deviation of the rating. ### Claim 15 (depends on 14) The system of claim 14, wherein the computer processor is configured to display an interview history for the interviewer, the interview history comprising one or more of a name of a job candidate, a date of interview, a type of interview, a job type of the interview, a rating of the job candidate provided by the interviewer, and a status of the interview; and wherein the computer processor is configured to provide a feature of viewing feedback on the interviewer and updating one or more interview skills of the interviewer. ### Claim 16 (depends on 14) The system of claim 14, wherein the computer processor is configured to display on a display unit a number of job candidate applications per job type per period of time, and a number of new interviews scheduled per job type per period of time. ### Claim 17 (depends on 16) The system of claim 16, wherein the computer processor is configured to receive a selection of the job type, and to display on a display unit a number of job candidates for the job type and a number of job candidates at a particular stage of the interview process. ### Claim 18 (depends on 17) The system of claim 17, wherein the computer processor is configured to display on a display unit a number of job candidates for the job type over a plurality of time periods, a number of experienced job candidates and inexperienced job candidates, and a number of job candidates from a university or a college. ### Claim 19 A system comprising: a computer processor configured to: receive data relating to one or more meetings among persons employed at a same business organization, wherein the meetings are not related to job interviews; store the data in a computer storage device; and analyze the data relating to the one or more meetings to determine one or more of an effectiveness of the one or more meetings and an effectiveness of a meeting participant; wherein the data comprises one or more of a skill or characteristic of a meeting participant and a subject of the meeting. ### Claim 20 (depends on 19) The system of claim 19, wherein the data comprises one or more of an issue to be addressed in the meeting, a person responsible for making a decision on the issue, and an indication of a decision being made on the issue. ### Claim 21 (depends on 20) The system of claim 20, wherein the computer processor is configured to: receive data relating to the subject and issue after a conclusion of the meeting; analyze the data relating to the subject and issue received after the conclusion of the meeting; and determine an effectiveness of the decision made on the issue. ### Claim 22 (depends on 19) The system of claim 19, wherein the meeting relates to a product line of the same business organization or a sales meeting of the same business organization.