# US 2014/0156333 A1 · Systems and methods for interview scheduling

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 2014/0156333 A1
- Document ID: US20140156333A1
- Status: Published application
- Kind: A1
- Application number: 13/706,129
- Filed: 2012-12-05
- Published: 2014-06-05
- Earliest claimed: 2012-12-05
- Inventors: Michael Olivier; Rachel Sanders; Alex Vauthey; Borislav Roussev
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US20140156333A1

## CPC

- G06Q 10/1093: Calendar-based scheduling for persons or groups
- G06Q: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR

## Abstract

A system for scheduling interviews includes an interviewer database and a calendar database. Interviewers are selected as a function of one or more modules of questions that are associated with each of the interviewers, and an interview schedule is generated for a job candidate from the selected interviewers. The system can also schedule and invite people to meetings based on their calendar availability and the skills, characteristics, or attributes associated with potential meeting attendees.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A system comprising:
a computer processor configured to:
store in an interviewer computer storage device data relating to a plurality of persons, the data including an association between each of the plurality of persons and a module of questions, the module of questions relating to one or more job types for which each person is qualified to interview a job candidate;
store in a calendar computer storage device calendar data relating to each of the plurality of persons;
receive into the computer processor data relating to the job candidate, the data relating to the job candidate comprising an education history, an employment history, and a job type for which an employer is considering the job candidate;
select from the interviewer computer storage device one or more persons to interview the job candidate as a function of the module of questions associated with each of the one or more persons and the job type for which the employer is considering the job candidate; and
generate an interview schedule for the job candidate, wherein the interview schedule includes the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate, and wherein the interview schedule is generated as a function of the calendar data for the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the interviewer computer storage device comprises an interview preference profile for each person, and the interview schedule is generated as a function of the interview preference profile for each person.

### Claim 3 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to:
store in a location computer storage device data relating to one or more locations at which the interview can be conducted; and
select one or more locations for the interview.

### Claim 4 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the data relating to the job type comprises one or more job positions.

### Claim 5 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to transmit an electronic message to the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate; and wherein the electronic message comprises one or more of an identification of the job candidate, data relating to the job candidate, a date and time for the interview, and a location for the interview.

### Claim 6 (depends on 5)

The system of claim 5, wherein the computer processor is configured to transmit the electronic message on a periodic basis to the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate; the electronic message comprising a reminder to each of the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate of an upcoming event relating to the interview or an outstanding task relating to the interview.

### Claim 7 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to update the calendar database as a function of the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate.

### Claim 8 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein a particular person is associated with one or more modules of questions as a function of a number of years of work experience in the job type, a number of years of training in the job type, or a number of years of education in the job type.

### Claim 9 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to select a particular person to interview the job candidate as a function of a number of interviews previously scheduled for the particular person during a particular time period.

### Claim 10 (depends on 9)

The system of claim 9, wherein the particular time period includes a period of time before the interview of the job candidate and a period of time after the interview of the job candidate.

### Claim 11 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to use one or more qualification levels to select a person to interview the job candidate (apprentice and master).

### Claim 12 (depends on 11)

The system of claim 11, wherein the computer processor is configured to automatically associate a qualification level with a particular person as a function of a number of interviews conducted by the particular person (as compared to other interviewers), a ratio of interviews accepted by the particular person and interviews attended by the particular person, a ratio of interviews accepted by the particular person and interviews for which the particular person provided feedback, ratings provided by a hiring committee on the feedback of the particular person, and a correlation of the particular person's past ratings of job candidates and whether the employer wanted to hire the job candidates.

### Claim 13 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, comprising a social network computer storage device; wherein the computer processor is configured to select the one or more persons to interview the job candidate as a function of one or more of a connection between the one or more persons and the job candidate in the social network computer storage device, a common school as stored in the social network computer storage device, and a similar skill set as stored in the network computer storage device.

### Claim 14 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, comprising a social network computer storage device; wherein the computer processor is configured to request and receive from the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate input relating to the job candidate; wherein the request is a function of a connection between the one or more persons and the job candidate in the social network computer storage device.

### Claim 15 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the interviewer computer storage device comprises data relating to a particular area of the job type, and the one or more persons selected to interview the job candidate are selected as a function of the particular area.

### Claim 16 (depends on 15)

The system of claim 15, wherein the particular area comprises a specific module of questions or a particular type of questions.

### Claim 17 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to select the one or more persons to interview the job candidate such that at least a minimum number of persons is selected to interview the job candidate, and such that at least a minimum number of persons at a particular interview qualification level or an experience level is selected to interview the job candidate.

### Claim 18 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured with a fairness algorithm, the fairness algorithm comprising a selection from the plurality of persons such that each of the plurality of persons is selected for an approximately equal number of interviews over a time period or a selection from the plurality of persons such a particular person is selected for an interview based on a fewer number of interviews accepted by the particular person as compared to others of the plurality of persons.

### Claim 19 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to select the one or more persons to interview the job candidate such that an experience level of each person is greater than the job candidate or the experience level of each person is within a range of the job candidate.

### Claim 20 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to:
receive an indication from each of the persons that they will participate in the interview of the job candidate;
receive a subsequent indication from a particular person that they will have to cancel his or her participation in the interview;
generate a list of substitute persons for the interview as a function of the modules of questions associated with the substitute persons and the calendar data for the substitute persons; and
receive a selection of an alternate person for the interview.

### Claim 21 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to receive input from an administrator to alter the interview schedule.

### Claim 22 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to generate a list of job candidates that are scheduled for upcoming job interviews, to receive a selection of a particular job candidate from the list of job candidates, and to display the interview schedule of the selected job candidate.

### Claim 23 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to transmit the interview schedule to one or more of a mobile device for the job candidate and mobiles devices for the persons selected to interview the job candidate.

### Claim 24 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to store a number of times that a particular person has conducted interviews using a particular module of questions.

### Claim 25 (depends on 24)

The system of claim 24, wherein the computer processor is configured to identify with a qualification level the particular person qualified to interview the job candidate using the particular module of questions (apprentice and master).

### Claim 26 (depends on 25)

The system of claim 25, wherein the computer processor is configured to automatically associate the qualification level with the particular person as a function of one or more of a number of interviews accepted by the particular person, a number of interviews conducted by the particular person, interview feedback provided by the particular person, and a correlation between ratings of job candidates provided by the particular person and decisions by an employer as to whether they would like to hire the job candidates.

### Claim 27 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the interview schedule comprises one or more of an initial screening telephonic or web-based interview and a subsequent in-person or web-based follow up interview.

### Claim 28 (depends on 27)

The system of claim 27, wherein the computer processor is configured to organize a plurality of job candidates into one or more categories comprising awaiting resume review, scheduled for the initial screening interview, and scheduled for the subsequent follow up interview.

### Claim 29 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is configured to display on a display unit a plurality of job candidates and a status of each of the plurality of job candidates.

### Claim 30 (depends on 27)

The system of claim 27, wherein the computer processor is configured to organize job candidates by one or more of the job type for which the job candidate is seeking employment and an experience level of the job candidate.

### Claim 31 (depends on 27)

The system of claim 27, wherein the computer processor is configured to accept input to assign to a recruiting coordinator a job candidate who has been selected for an interview; and to display on a display unit one or more of an indication of an identification of the candidate selected for the interview, an amount of time since a last action for the candidate selected for the interview, a job type for the candidate selected for the interview, an interview type for the candidate selected for the interview, and an identification of the recruiting coordinator.

### Claim 32 (depends on 31)

The system of claim 31, wherein the computer processor is configured to display on a display unit for the recruiting coordinator one or more candidates to be scheduled for an interview; and to accept an input from the recruiting coordinator signaling the computer processor to automatically generate the interview schedule.

### Claim 33

A system comprising:
a computer processor configured to:
store in a computer storage device data relating to a plurality of persons, the data including one or more of skills, characteristics, and attributes for each of the plurality of persons;
store in a calendar computer storage device calendar data relating to each of the plurality of persons;
receive into the computer processor data relating to a meeting subject;
select from the computer storage device one or more persons to invite to a meeting relating to the meeting subject as a function of the skills, characteristics, or attributes associated with each of the one or more persons; and
generate an invitation to the meeting, wherein the invitation includes the one or more persons selected to invite to the meeting, and wherein the invitation is generated as a function of the calendar data for the one or more persons selected to invite to the meeting.

### Claim 34 (depends on 33)

The system of claim 33, comprising generating an invitation to the meeting for one or more persons not selected as a function of the skills, characteristics, or attributes.

### Claim 35 (depends on 33)

The system of claim 33, wherein the computer processor is configured to:
display meeting subjects, person skills, person characteristics, and person attributes;
receive a selection of meeting subjects, person skills, person characteristics, and person attributes; and
generate an invitation to the meeting for one or more persons as a function of the selection of the meeting subjects, person skills, person characteristics, and person attributes.

### Claim 36

A system comprising:
a computer processor configured to:
store in a computer storage device data relating to a plurality of persons, the data including one or more of skills, characteristics, and attributes for each of the plurality of persons;
store in a calendar computer storage device calendar data relating to each of the plurality of persons;
select from the computer storage device one or more persons to invite to a meeting as a function of the skills, characteristics, or attributes associated with each of the one or more persons; and
generate an invitation to the meeting, wherein the invitation includes the one or more persons selected to invite to the meeting, and wherein the invitation is generated as a function of the calendar data for the one or more persons selected to invite to the meeting.

### Claim 37 (depends on 36)

The system of claim 36, wherein the computer processor is configured to:
display person skills, person characteristics, and person attributes;
receive a selection of person skills, person characteristics, and person attributes; and
generate an invitation to the meeting for one or more persons as a function of the selection of the person skills, person characteristics, and person attributes.