Orthopaedic fixation method and device
AssigneeNone recorded
InventorsEd Austin, John Schneider
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeNone recorded
InventorsEd Austin, John Schneider
Estimating the term…
Embodiments of the present invention include devices and methods for aligning fragments of a fractured bone or for positioning bones. In some embodiments, fixation devices and anatomical features are modeled with the aid of a computer, and the model is used to determine how an actual fixation device should be configured to align or position the bones.
An external orthopaedic fixation device in combination with a computer, the combination for aligning fragments of a fractured bone comprising:
A method of configuring an orthopaedic fixation device that can be coupled to fragments of a fractured bone comprising the acts of:
A method of determining adjustments required to align fragments of a fractured bone coupled in an orthopaedic fixation device that has a first fixation element coupled to a second fixation element by at least three struts, each strut coupled at its first end to the first fixation element and at its second end to the second fixation element, comprising the acts of:
A digital computing device programmed to provide data to a user for adjusting an orthopaedic fixation device that can be coupled to fragments of a fractured bone comprising:
A program storage device containing instructions that enable a computer to provide data specifying how to configure an orthopaedic fixation device that can be coupled to fragments of a fractured bone, the instructions comprising the acts of:
A method of configuring a multi-strut orthopaedic fixation device that can be coupled to fragments of a fractured bone comprising the acts of:
A method of configuring an orthopaedic fixation device that can be coupled to bones on either side of a joint to move the bones relative to one another comprising the acts of:
A program storage device containing instructions that enable a computer to graphically represent anatomical features in relation to a fixation device, the instructions comprising the acts of:
A method of planning the application of a multi-strut external fixation device comprising the acts of:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Backward citations are indexed for grants only.
For external osteosynthesis, e.g. distractors, contractors: ring frames, i.e. devices extending around the bones to be positioned
Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery: computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical…
Medical diagnosis and surgery
Term end not estimated
Embodiments of the invention are directed to treating musculoskeletal conditions, including skeletal fractures. More specifically, apparatuses and methods for securing and placing fragments of a fractured bone or bones on two sides of a joint in desired locations are disclosed. In some embodiments of the invention, apparatuses and methods are used to generate a computer model of a fixation device and bones or bone fragments. Through operations on the model, desired placement of the bones or bone fragments is determined quickly and accurately regardless of the initial configuration of the fixation device. The operations required to create the desired placement of the bones or bone fragments may then be enacted on a corresponding physical device to treat the musculoskeletal condition.
Devices and methods of treating skeletal fractures using ring external fixation structures are well known in the art. Smith & Nephew, Inc. has developed and marketed a number of SPATIAL FRAME® brand external ring fixators based on the general concept of a Stewart platform. Smith & Nephew, Inc. owns U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,702,389; 5,728,095; 5,891,143; 5,971,984; 6,030,386; and 6,129,727 that disclose many basic concepts of and improvements to Stewart platform based external fixators. The disclosure of those patents is incorporated by reference herein.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, mathematically solving for the relative positions of the members of a Stewart platform creates a somewhat cumbersome equation. As an example, note the rotational matrix detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,971,984. This rotational matrix is a means by which one Stewart platform fixation element can be transformed relative to another to align fragments of a bone with inputs commonly obtainable from a clinical examination. However, in order to use the rotational matrix, a starting position for the fixation elements must be known. Therefore, prior art systems typically have required a Stewart platform type ring fixator to either start or end its transformation in a neutral position. A neutral position is a position where all of the six struts are the same length, and consequently, the rings of the fixator are parallel to one another. See FIGS. 4 and 5. A neutral position makes locating the starting positions of the fixation elements readily calculable. Once the frame moves beyond neutral, Cartesian coordinates of the frame components are difficult to find mathematically. This limitation results in complexity with regard to a mathematical solution for a Stewart platform. As a practical matter, it means that in the past, supposed correction solutions that did not in fact solve a particular deformity were very difficult to secondarily correct. This situation will be described in more detail below as a “crooked-frame/crooked-bone” situation. A solution for the crooked-frame/crooked-bone situation will be described as a “total residual” solution.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an orthopaedic fixation device.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an orthopaedic fixation device coupled to a tibia.
FIG. 3 is a system diagram of an orthopaedic fixation device in combination with a computer.
FIG. 1 shows an external orthopaedic fixation device 100 useful for aligning fragments of a fractured bone. The device shown is a Stewart platform based ring fixator device. Smith & Nephew, Inc. markets the particular device shown as a SPATIAL FRAME® brand or TAYLOR SPATIAL FRAME® brand external fixator. The fixation device 100 includes a proximal ring or first fixation element 10 and a distal ring or second fixation element 20. In other embodiments of the invention, the proximal ring could be the second fixation element and the distal ring could be the first fixation element. In FIG. 1, the first fixation element 10 is coupled to the second fixation element 20 by six adjustable length struts 1-6. Each of the struts 1-6 is coupled at its first end to the first fixation element 10 and at its second end to the second fixation element 20.
FIG. 2 illustrates the first fixation element 10 coupled to a first bone fragment 11, and the second fixation element 20 coupled to a second bone fragment 21. As shown, the bone fragments are coupled to the fixation elements using cantilevered bone pins 13. In other embodiments, wires, bilateral pins, or any variety of coupling devices effective to secure a bone relative to a fixation element may be used. The fixation device 100 shown is coupled to a tibia; however, the device may be used on practically any bone on which it could be placed. For example, and without limitation, the device could also be used on a femur or a humerus.
FIG. 3 shows the fixation device 100 in combination with a computer 200. Such a combination is useful to align fragments of a fractured bone. The computer 200 may be an autonomously operating computer system such as, for example, first computer system 201. All storage, processing, etc. necessary to align fragments of a fractured bone may be accomplished with the first computer system 201. In other embodiments, two or more computers may be linked together over a network to accomplish tasks necessary to align the fragments. As shown, computer systems 201 and 202 are linked over a network 203. The network may be a local area network or a wide area network such as the Internet. In some embodiments, all of the programs that are run to accomplish the tasks may be run on one or more of the computer systems, and another of the computer systems may merely be used to display data. Alternatively, the programs run may be run partially on several computer systems, with data and instructions being shared over the network.