Multi-jurisdictional requirement sorting system for compliance devices

A method, comprising:

• a. receiving, at a non-transitory computer memory, criteria data regarding a first control requirement frame for a first jurisdiction, a second control requirement frame for a second jurisdiction, and a third control requirement frame for a third jurisdiction, wherein the criteria data for each control requirement frame comprises at least:
• i. criteria data for an alcohol concentration limit data subframe, and
• ii. criteria data for a reporting subframe;
• b. storing the criteria data in a stringency database;
• c. sorting the criteria data within each subframe based on the relative stringency of criteria data;
• d. receiving a request for a compliance device that complies with the first jurisdiction and the second jurisdiction, wherein the compliance device comprises a monitoring device;
• e. accessing the sorted criteria data within each subframe of the first and second jurisdictions to determine control criteria data for a combined control requirement frame for the compliance device, wherein the control criteria data comprises the criteria data of a more stringent jurisdiction for each subframe, wherein the control criteria data comprises at least a portion of the criteria data for the first jurisdiction and a portion of the criteria data for the second jurisdiction;
• f. providing the combined control requirement frame for the compliance device, and
• g. receiving test event data from the compliance device in response to a testing event, wherein the testing event comprises the compliance device prompting a user to provide a sample.

A system, comprising:

• a non-transitory computer memory and a computer processor, and
• computer instructions stored on the memory for instructing the processor to perform the steps of:
• a. receiving, at the non-transitory computer memory, criteria data regarding a first control requirement frame for a first jurisdiction, a second control requirement frame for a second jurisdiction, and a third control requirement frame for a third jurisdiction, wherein the criteria data for each control requirement frame comprises at least:
• i. criteria data for an intoxicant concentration limit data subframe, and
• ii. criteria data for a reporting subframe;
• b. storing the criteria data in a stringency database;
• c. sorting the first, second and third control requirement frames based on the relative stringency of criteria data;
• d. receiving a request for a compliance device according to the requirements of the first jurisdiction and the second jurisdiction, wherein the compliance device comprises a monitoring device;
• e. accessing the sorted control frames of the first and second jurisdictions to determine an operational control frame based on the sorted control frames;
• f. providing the operational control frame, and
• g. receiving test event data from the compliance device in response to a testing event, wherein the testing event comprises the compliance device prompting a user to provide a sample.