# US 12,111,245 B1 · Calibrating close interval survey data with remote monitoring data

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 12,111,245 B1
- Document ID: US12111245B1
- Status: Granted
- Kind: B1
- Application number: 18/122,217
- Filed: 2023-03-16
- Published: 2024-09-19
- Granted: 2024-10-08
- Earliest claimed: 2023-03-16
- Assignees: Mobiltex Data Ltd.
- Applicants: Mobiltex Data Ltd.
- Inventors: Matthew Albert Barrett; Antonio Laranjo Da Costa; William Philip Maize
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US12111245B1

## CPC

- C23F 13/04: Controlling or regulating desired parameters
- G01N 17/02: Electrochemical measuring systems for weathering, corrosion or corrosion-protection measurement
- C23F 2213/32: Pipes
- C23F: NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE (working metal by laser beams B23K26/00; desurfacing by applying flames B23K7/00; working of metal by electro-erosion B23H; producing decorative effects by removing surface material, e.g. by engraving, by etching, B44C1/22; electrolytic etching or polishing C25F); INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- G01N: INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES (measuring or testing apparatus or processes other than immunoassay, involving enzymes or microorganisms C12M, C12Q)

## Abstract

A method for calibrating close interval survey (CIS) data with remotely monitored data includes obtaining a plurality of CIS measurements from a plurality of CIS locations along a pipeline, obtaining a first plurality of remotely monitored measurements from a plurality of test stations positioned along the pipeline for a first time period, assigning, for each of the plurality of test stations, one of the plurality of CIS locations as an adjacent CIS location based on location data for the plurality of CIS locations and the plurality of test stations, and, calibrating the CIS data with the remotely monitored data by using the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements for each of the plurality of test stations as a proxy measurement for the adjacent CIS location.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A method for calibrating close interval survey (CIS) measurements, the method comprising:
obtaining a plurality of CIS measurements from a plurality of CIS locations along a pipeline;
obtaining a first plurality of remotely monitored measurements from a plurality of test stations positioned along the pipeline for a first time period;
assigning, for each of the plurality of test stations, one of the plurality of CIS locations as an adjacent CIS location based on location data for the plurality of CIS locations and the plurality of test stations;
calibrating the CIS measurements with the remotely monitored measurements by using the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements for each of the plurality of test stations as a proxy measurement for the adjacent CIS location;
applying a seasonal variation model to the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements to obtain seasonally adjusted remotely monitored measurements for each test station of the plurality of test stations for a second time period;
extrapolating the seasonally adjusted remotely monitored measurements along the pipeline between two adjacent test stations of the plurality of test stations to obtain seasonally adjusted remotely monitored measurements between the two adjacent test stations; and,
projecting the plurality of CIS measurements to the second time period by adjusting the plurality of CIS measurements based on the extrapolation of the seasonally adjusted remotely monitored measurements along the pipeline to obtain projected CIS potential measurements for the second time period.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, further comprising:
calculating, for each of the plurality of test stations, an average value of the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements; and,
calibrating the CIS measurements with the remotely monitored measurements by using the average value of the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements for each of the plurality of test stations as the proxy measurement for the adjacent CIS location.

### Claim 3 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein the remotely monitored measurements comprises time-series voltage data or time-series current data.

### Claim 4 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements comprise historic daily DC potential measurements from each of the plurality of test stations.

### Claim 5 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of CIS measurements are obtained during the first time period.

### Claim 6 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of test stations comprise a first test station positioned at a first end of the pipeline and a second test station positioned at a second end of the pipeline.

### Claim 7 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of CIS measurements comprises pipe-to-soil AC and DC potentials at each of the plurality of CIS locations.

### Claim 8 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of CIS measurements and the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements are recorded with latitude and longitude data and GPS timestamps.

### Claim 9 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein assigning, for each of the plurality of test stations, one of the plurality of CIS locations as the adjacent CIS location based on location data for the plurality of CIS locations and the plurality of test stations comprises:
calculating a distance between latitude and longitude of each of the plurality of test stations and each of the plurality of CIS locations.

### Claim 10 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, wherein applying the seasonal variation model comprises using a cosine function represented by:
VDC=A cos(2πt−φ)+mt+Vo
wherein VDC is the DC potential, A is amplitude, t is absolute time, φ is phase-shift, representing the calendar date of maximum potential, m is the slope change in potential over time, and Vo is the average potential.

### Claim 11 (depends on 1)

The method of claim 1, further comprising:
obtaining remotely monitored rectifier voltage and current measurements from a plurality of rectifiers installed along the pipeline; and,
analyzing influence of the rectifier voltage and current measurements on the CIS measurements.

### Claim 12

A method for calibrating close interval survey (CIS) measurements, the method comprising:
obtaining a plurality of CIS measurements from a plurality of CIS locations along a pipeline;
obtaining a first plurality of remotely monitored measurements from a plurality of test stations positioned along the pipeline for a first time period;
assigning, for each of the plurality of test stations, one of the plurality of CIS locations as an adjacent CIS location based on location data for the plurality of CIS locations and the plurality of test stations;
calibrating the CIS measurements with the remotely monitored measurements by using the first plurality of remotely monitored measurements for each of the plurality of test stations as a proxy measurement for the adjacent CIS location;
obtaining a second plurality of remotely monitored measurements from the plurality of test stations for the second time period;
extrapolating the second plurality of remotely monitored measurements along the pipeline between two adjacent test stations of the plurality of test stations; and,
projecting the plurality of CIS measurements to the second time period by adjusting the plurality of CIS measurements based on the extrapolation of the second plurality of remotely monitored measurements along the pipeline to obtain projected CIS potential measurements for the second time period.

### Claim 13

A computer-implemented method for seasonally modelling close interval survey (CIS) potential measurements for a pipeline segment, the method comprising:
validating CIS potential measurements taken along the pipeline segment during a first time period with remotely monitored potential measurements measured at a plurality of test stations along the pipeline segment during the first time period based on location data of the CIS potential measurements and the remotely monitored potential measurements;
applying a seasonal variation model to the remotely monitored potential measurements to obtain seasonally adjusted potential measurements for the plurality of test stations for a second time period;
applying an extrapolation of the seasonally adjusted potential measurements along the pipeline between two adjacent test stations of the plurality of test stations; and,
projecting the CIS potential measurements to the second time period by adjusting the CIS potential measurements based on the extrapolation of the seasonally adjusted potential measurements along the pipeline to obtain projected CIS potential measurements for the second time period.

### Claim 14 (depends on 13)

The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the seasonal variation model comprises using a cosine function represented by:
VDC=A cos(2πt−φ)+mt+Vo
wherein VDC is the DC potential, A is amplitude, φ is phase-shift, representing the calendar date of maximum potential, m is the slope change in potential over time, and Vo is the average potential.

### Claim 15 (depends on 13)

The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein validating the CIS potential measurements with the remotely monitored potential measurements comprises:
assigning, for each of the plurality of test stations, a location of one of the CIS potential measurements as an adjacent CIS location based on the location data for the CIS potential measurements and the plurality of test stations; and,
calibrating the CIS potential measurements with the remotely monitored potential measurements by using the remotely monitored potential measurements for each of the plurality of test stations as a proxy measurement for the adjacent CIS location.

### Claim 16

A computer-implemented method for seasonally modelling close interval survey (CIS) potential measurements, the method comprising:
validating CIS potential measurements taken along a pipeline segment during a first time period with a first plurality of remotely monitored potential measurements measured at a plurality of test stations along the pipeline segment during the first time period;
obtaining a second plurality of remotely monitored potential measurements measured at the plurality of test stations during a second time period;
extrapolating the second plurality of remotely monitored potential measurements between two adjacent test stations of the plurality of test stations for the second time period; and,
projecting the CIS potential measurements to the second time period by adjusting the CIS potential measurements from the first time period based on the extrapolation of the second plurality of remotely monitored potential measurements to obtain projected CIS potential measurements for the second time period.

### Claim 17 (depends on 16)

The computer-implemented method of claim 16, wherein validating CIS potential measurements with a first plurality of remotely monitored potential measurements comprises calibrating the CIS potential measurements with an average of the first plurality of remotely monitored potential measurements at each of the plurality of test stations based on location data of the CIS potential measurements and the plurality of test stations.

### Claim 18

A non-transitory computer readable medium containing computer instructions stored therein for causing a computer processor to perform the steps of:
receiving close interval survey data from a close interval survey (CIS) performed at a plurality of CIS locations along a pipeline for a first time period;
receiving remotely monitored data from a plurality of test stations positioned along the pipeline for the first time period;
assigning, for each of the plurality of test stations, one of the plurality of CIS locations as an adjacent CIS location based on location data for the plurality of CIS locations and the plurality of test stations;
calibrating the close interval survey data with the remotely monitored data by using the remotely monitored data for each test station of the plurality of test stations as a proxy measurement for the adjacent CIS location;
applying a seasonal variation model to the remotely monitored data to obtain seasonally adjusted remotely monitored data for each test station of the plurality of test stations for a second time period;
extrapolating the seasonally adjusted remotely monitored data along the pipeline between two adjacent test stations of the plurality of test stations to obtain seasonally adjusted remotely monitored data between the two adjacent test stations; and
projecting the close interval survey data to the second time period by adjusting the close interval survey data based on the extrapolation of the seasonally adjusted remotely monitored data along the pipeline to obtain projected CIS potential measurements for the second time period.

### Claim 19 (depends on 18)

The method of claim 18, wherein applying the seasonal variation model comprises using a cosine function represented by:
VDC=A cos(2πt−φ)+mt+Vo
wherein VDC is the DC potential, A is amplitude, t is absolute time, φ is phase-shift, representing the calendar date of maximum potential, m is the slope change in potential over time, and Vo is the average potential.