# US 11,999,178 B2 · Closed-loop feedback printing system

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 11,999,178 B2
- Document ID: US11999178B2
- Status: Granted
- Kind: B2
- Application number: 17/421,625
- Filed: 2020-01-10
- Published: 2022-04-28
- Granted: 2024-06-04
- Earliest claimed: 2019-01-11
- Assignees: Ball Corporation
- Applicants: Ball Corporation
- Inventors: Michael W. Miller; Adam P. S. Stowitts
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US11999178B2

## CPC

- B41J 3/40733: {Printing on cylindrical or rotationally symmetrical objects, e. g. on bottles}
- B41F 17/20: on articles of uniform cross-section, e.g. pencils, rulers, resistors
- B41F 33/0036: {Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control}
- B41J 11/0015: {for treating before, during or after printing or for uniform coating or laminating the copy material before or after printing (selective coating B41J2/2114)}
- B41J 29/38: Drives, motors, controls or automatic cut-off devices for the entire printing mechanism
- B41J 2002/012: {with intermediate transfer member}
- B41J: TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
- B41F: PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES (manifolding devices or office printing machines B41L)

## Abstract

A system for decorating multiple containers in a single manufacturing run has a decorator, which includes a source of ink and print site where an ink graphic is deposited to each container in a plurality of containers that make up a manufacturing queue. An inspection station is located downstream from the decorator. The inspection station performs an optical evaluation of a quality of a pattern of ink deposited on at least one container in the plurality of containers A closed-loop feedback is responsive to the inspection station wherein the decorator is automatically adjusted in response to the optical evaluation performed at the inspection station.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A system for decorating multiple containers in a single manufacturing run, the system comprising:
a decorator, the decorator comprising:
a source of ink; and
a print site,
wherein an ink graphic is deposited to each container in a plurality of containers that make up a manufacturing queue at the print site;
an inspection station upstream from the decorator, the inspection station performing an evaluation of at least one manufacturing variable associated with at least one process upstream from the decorator on at least one container in the plurality of containers that make up the manufacturing queue;
a closed-loop feedback responsive to the evaluation performed at the inspection station wherein an automatic adjustment to the decorator to at least one decorator parameter is made in response to the evaluation performed at the inspection station; and
one or more processors in communication with the inspection station and the decorator, the one or more processors controlling an analysis of the evaluation against a pre-determined manufacturing tolerance and a response to the evaluation by the decorator.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1 wherein the ink graphic deposited on each subsequent container in the plurality of containers that make up the manufacturing queue is automatically adjusted without user intervention in response to the evaluation performed at the inspection station.

### Claim 3 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1 further comprising:
a non-transitory memory on which one or more software routines are stored which control the analysis of the evaluation and the response to the evaluation by the decorator.

### Claim 4 (depends on 2)

The system of claim 2 wherein the automatic adjustment includes making an adjustment to a manufacturing process upstream from the decorator in response to the evaluation.

### Claim 5 (depends on 2)

The system of claim 2 wherein the automatic adjustment is made to a manufacturing process downstream from the decorator in response to the evaluation.

### Claim 6 (depends on 2)

The system of claim 2 wherein the automatic adjustment to the decorator in response to the evaluation comprises degrading an attribute of print quality to ensure each container in the manufacturing queue continues without interruption.

### Claim 7 (depends on 2)

The system of claim 2 wherein the automatic adjustment to the decorator is in response to an optical evaluation, the automatic adjustment comprising improving an attribute of print quality to ensure process of each container in the manufacturing queue continues without interruption.

### Claim 8 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1 wherein the single manufacturing run includes a plurality of graphics, wherein a first subset of the plurality of containers receives a first graphic and a second subset of the plurality of containers receives a second graphic, and the first and second graphics are unique relative, or compared, to each other, and wherein the automatic adjustment to the decorator responsive to the evaluation comprises choosing one of the first or second graphics to be applied to one or more remaining undecorated containers in the manufacturing queue.

### Claim 9 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1 wherein the decorator is automatically responsive to changes in atmospheric conditions via the closed-loop feedback.