# US 11,992,418 B2 · Expandable interbody implant with lateral articulation

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 11,992,418 B2
- Document ID: US11992418B2
- Status: Granted
- Kind: B2
- Application number: 17/358,735
- Filed: 2021-06-25
- Published: 2021-10-14
- Granted: 2024-05-28
- Earliest claimed: 2016-10-26
- Assignees: Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
- Applicants: Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
- Inventors: Amir Ali Sharifi-Mehr; Oliver Buchert; Ronald Litke; Thomas A. Alheidt
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US11992418B2

## CPC

- A61F 2/4455: {for the fusion of spinal bodies, e.g. intervertebral fusion of adjacent spinal bodies, e.g. fusion cages (intervertebral discs A61F2/442)}
- A61F 2/442: {Intervertebral or spinal discs, e.g. resilient (non-disc-shaped intervertebral inflatable pockets A61F2/441; non-disc-shaped intervertebral fusion implants A61F2/4455)}
- A61F 2/4611: {of spinal prostheses}
- A61F 2/484: {Fluid means, i.e. hydraulic or pneumatic}
- A61F 2002/30329: {Connections or couplings between prosthetic parts, e.g. between modular parts; Connecting elements}
- A61F 2002/30537: {adjustable}
- A61F 2002/30538: {for adjusting angular orientation}
- A61F 2002/30556: {for adjusting thickness}
- A61F 2002/30579: {with mechanically expandable devices, e.g. fixation devices}
- A61F 2002/4629: {connected to the endoprosthesis or implant via a threaded connection}
- A61F: FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS (dental prosthetics A61C)

## Abstract

An intervertebral implant may include an input for expanding at least two extendable support elements connected to a body at respective locations, such that the extendable support elements each apply a respective expansion force directed away from a surface of the body. Application of a single input force to the input may induce the extendable support elements to apply different amounts of expansion force. Alternatively or additionally, an intervertebral implant may include at least two portions connected together by a hinge for articulation about the hinge. In one aspect, the hinge may include at least two rigid links each pivotably connected to the two portions. In another aspect, a rigid link of the hinge may include a passageway for communicating a hydraulic fluid between the two portions. A locking system may be positionable into successive locked configurations by operation of a cam to prevent contraction of an extendable support element.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A spinal implant for placement in an intervertebral space between a first vertebral body and a second vertebral body of a spine, the spinal implant comprising:
a first portion having an upper vertebral engagement surface and an opposing lower vertebral engagement surface, the first portion having a first extendable support element including a first vertical post and a first pawl the first extendable support element being actuatable to move the upper and lower vertebral engagement surfaces of the first portion away from one another along a superior-inferior dimension;
a second portion having an upper vertebral engagement surface and an opposing lower vertebral engagement surface, the second portion having a second extendable support element including a second vertical post, and a second pawl the second extendable support element being actuatable to move the upper and lower vertebral engagement surfaces of the second portion away from one another along the superior-inferior dimension
a tool interface at a proximal end of the spinal implant configured to receivably couple a tool to the spinal implant; and
a hinge connecting together the first and second portions such that the first and second portions are articulatable about the hinge;
wherein the upper and lower vertebral engagement surfaces of the first portion are movable relative to one another along a superior-inferior dimension independently of movement of the upper and lower vertebral engagement surfaces of the second portion relative to one another along the superior-inferior dimension.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The spinal implant of claim 1, wherein the hinge includes a third extendable support element.

### Claim 3 (depends on 2)

The spinal implant of claim 2, wherein the spinal implant is further configured such that when the first, second, and third extendable support elements expand, the first extendable support element applies a first expansion force, the second extendable element applies a second expansion force, and the third extendable element applies a third expansion force.

### Claim 4 (depends on 3)

The spinal implant of claim 3, wherein the first, second, and third expansion forces are applied simultaneously.

### Claim 5 (depends on 3)

The spinal implant of claim 3, wherein at least one of the first, second, or third expansion forces is greater than the other expansion forces.

### Claim 6 (depends on 1)

The spinal implant of claim 1, wherein:
the tool includes a spreader for spreading apart the first and second portions of the spinal implant about the hinge, and
wherein the spreading apart of the first and second portions of the spinal implant about the hinge is independent of the relative movement of the upper and lower vertebral engagement surfaces of each of the first and second portions along the superior-inferior dimension.

### Claim 7 (depends on 1)

The spinal implant of claim 1, further comprising a first control cable extending around an outer surface of the spinal implant and coupled to the first pawl and a second control cable extending around the outer surface of the spinal implant and coupled to the second pawl,
wherein each of the first and second control cables are coupleable to the tool such that pulling each of the first and second control cables by the tool causes the respective first and second pawls to disengage from the respective first and second vertical posts so as to allow the upper and lower vertebral engagement surfaces of the respective first and second portions to move towards one another along the superior-inferior dimension.

### Claim 8 (depends on 1)

The spinal implant of claim 1, wherein the first extendable support element includes a first piston slidably received within a first cylinder and the second extendable support element includes a second piston slidably received within a second cylinder.

### Claim 9 (depends on 8)

The spinal implant of claim 8, wherein the hinge includes a third piston slidably received within a third cylinder, each of the first, second, and third pistons are expandable by supplying hydraulic fluid through the tool to a port at the proximal end of the spinal implant.

### Claim 10 (depends on 9)

The spinal implant of claim 9, wherein the spinal implant is configured to direct the hydraulic fluid from the port in the first portion to the second portion through the hinge.

### Claim 11 (depends on 8)

The spinal implant of claim 8, wherein:
the first piston is connected to a first upper lock support configured to releasably engage a first lower lock support,
the second piston is connected to a second upper lock support configured to releasably engage a second lower lock support, and
the hinge includes a third extendable support element having a third piston slidably received within a third cylinder, the third piston connected to a third upper lock support configured to releasably engage a third lower lock support.

### Claim 12 (depends on 11)

The spinal implant of claim 11, wherein each of the first, second, and third lower lock supports are rotationally biased into mating engagement of the respective first, second, and third upper lock supports such that the first, second, and third pistons are prevented from retracting back into its respective cylinder at one of a variety of heights when the respective upper and lower lock supports are engaged.

### Claim 13 (depends on 11)

The spinal implant of claim 11, wherein the first, second, and third lower lock supports are configured to be unlocked by rotating the first, second, and third lower lock supports away from engagement with the respective first, second, and third upper lock supports such that the first, second, and third pistons can retract.

### Claim 14

A method of expanding a spinal implant in an intervertebral space between a first vertebral body and a second vertebral body of a spine, the method comprising:
inserting the spinal implant with a tool located in a tool interface at a proximal end of the spinal implant configured to receivably couple the tool to the spinal implant into the intervertebral space;
spreading first and second articulatable portions of the implant apart with the tool about a hinge of the implant, wherein the first articulatable portion has a first extendable support element including a first vertical post and a first pawl the first extendable support element being actuatable to move an upper vertebral engagement surface and a lower vertebral engagement surface of the first portion away from one another, and wherein the second articulatable portion has a second extendable support element including a second vertical post, and a second pawl the second extendable support element being actuatable to move an upper vertebral engagement surface and a lower vertebral engagement surface of the second portion away from one another;
expanding the implant along a superior-inferior dimension by actuating the first and second extendable support elements.

### Claim 15 (depends on 14)

The method of claim 14, wherein expanding the implant along a longitudinal axis of the spine is independent of the spreading of the first and second articulatable portions.

### Claim 16 (depends on 14)

The method of claim 14, wherein when expanding the implant along a longitudinal axis of the spine the first extendable support element applies a first expansion force and the second extendable element applies a second expansion force.

### Claim 17 (depends on 16)

The method of claim 16, wherein the first and second expansion forces are applied simultaneously.

### Claim 18 (depends on 16)

The method of claim 16 wherein the first expansion force is greater than the second expansion force.