Acoustic evaluation of wood properties
AssigneeUsnr, LLC
InventorAki J. Anttila
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeUsnr, LLC
InventorAki J. Anttila
Estimating the term…
Embodiments provide systems, apparatuses, and method for determining the Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) of a wood workpiece based on the travel time and/or velocity of an impact-induced acoustic stress wave. A housing may be configured to reduce extraneous acoustic waves and/or contaminants near an acoustic transducer to thereby reduce errors in the detection/identification of the acoustic stress wave. A computer system may be programmed to determine the MOE of the workpiece based on the travel time and/or velocity of multiple acoustic stress waves induced by corresponding impacts at respective locations along the end of the workpiece as the workpiece travels in a first direction. Corresponding methods and an induction system for rapidly and repeatedly striking the end of the workpiece are also described herein.
A housing for an acoustic transducer, wherein the acoustic transducer has a first end, an opposite second end, and a middle portion between said ends, and the acoustic transducer is configured to detect acoustic waves at said first end, the housing comprising:
A method of using an acoustic grader to assess the stiffness of an elongated wood workpiece as the workpiece moves along a path of travel on a conveyor, wherein the acoustic grader includes an inductor that is selectively actuable to strike the workpiece and a detector that is configured to detect impact-induced acoustic stress waves traveling longitudinally through the workpiece, the method comprising:
A grading system for grading an elongated wood workpiece, the grading system comprising:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Analysing solids: by imparting shocks to the workpiece and detecting the vibrations or the acoustic waves caused by the shocks
Analysing solids: by measuring propagation velocity or propagation time of acoustic waves
Arrangements for orientation or scanning by relative movement of the head and the sensor: by moving the material relative to a stationary sensor
Details , e.g. general constructional or apparatus details: providing acoustic coupling , e.g. water
About 14 years 6 months of term left · ends 26 Apr 2041 (estimated)
Embodiments herein relate to the field of lumber manufacturing, and, more specifically, to methods, systems, and apparatuses for estimating the strength and/or stiffness of elongated wood workpieces based in part on acoustic data.
Lumber—i.e., solid pieces of wood sawn from logs—is produced for a variety of uses. The suitability of a given piece of lumber for a particular use is partly a function of inherent characteristics such as wood type (e.g., hardwood vs. softwood), wood species, and natural defects (e.g., knots, rot, pitch pockets, compression wood, etc.), and characteristics introduced or influenced by the manufacturing process, such as the dimensions of the piece, moisture content, manufacturing defects, the locations of natural or manufacturing defects relative to the machined surfaces, and the like. Many of these characteristics affect the appearance, strength, stiffness, and other properties of lumber. As wood is a natural product, the properties of lumber can vary widely, even among pieces of lumber cut from the same log.
Lumber is commonly graded according to established rules. Different sets of rules are applicable to different lumber types and intended uses. For example, in the context of softwood lumber, appearance lumber intended for decorative or non-structural use is often graded based on visual appearance, while ‘dimensional’ lumber intended for structural use is often graded based on mechanical properties that relate to strength. Stiffness, which is commonly expressed as a modulus of elasticity (MOE), has a known relationship to bending strength and is frequently used to estimate strength.
Embodiments will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings.
FIGS. 1A-C illustrate a perspective view and plan views of an acoustic grading apparatus;
FIGS. 2A-B illustrate perspective and front elevational views, respectively, of components of the apparatus of FIGS. 1A-C;
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration embodiments that may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope. Therefore, the following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of embodiments is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Various operations may be described as multiple discrete operations in turn, in a manner that may be helpful in understanding embodiments; however, the order of description should not be construed to imply that these operations are order dependent.
The description may use perspective-based descriptions such as up/down, back/front, and top/bottom. Such descriptions are merely used to facilitate the discussion and are not intended to restrict the application of disclosed embodiments.