Vertical axis wind turbine air concentration tower with reduced radar cross section

#The present invention is generally related to a vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT), and more particularly, is related to reducing radar cross section of the vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs).

#This section describes technical field in detail and discusses problems encountered in the technical field. Therefore, statements in the section are not to be construed as prior art.

#Wind energy is one of the most cost-effective forms of renewable energy, with ever-increasing global installed capacity. For example, as of 2015 Denmark, by percentage, generated 40% of its electric power from wind.

#The accompanying drawings illustrate the embodiments of systems, methods, and other aspects of the disclosure. A person with ordinary skills in the art will appreciate that the illustrated element boundaries (e.g., boxes, groups of boxes, or other shapes) in the figures represent an example of the boundaries. In some examples, one element may be designed as multiple elements, or multiple elements may be designed as one element. In some examples, an element shown as an internal component of one element may be implemented as an external component in another, and vice versa. Furthermore, the elements may not be drawn to scale.

#Various embodiments will hereinafter be described in accordance with the appended drawings, which are provided to illustrate, not limit, the scope, wherein similar designations denote similar elements, and in which:

#FIG. 1 illustrates a general view of the VAWT apparatus;

#While reading this section (Description of An Exemplary Preferred Embodiment, which describes the exemplary embodiment of the best mode of the invention, hereinafter referred to as “exemplary embodiment”), one should consider the exemplary embodiment as the best mode for practicing the invention during filing of the patent in accordance with the inventor's belief. As a person with ordinary skills in the art may recognize substantially equivalent structures or substantially equivalent acts to achieve the same results in the same manner, or in a dissimilar manner, the exemplary embodiment should not be interpreted as limiting the invention to one embodiment.

#The discussion of a species (or a specific item) invokes the genus (the class of items) to which the species belongs as well as related species in this genus. Similarly, the recitation of a genus invokes the species known in the art. Furthermore, as technology develops, numerous additional alternatives to achieve an aspect of the invention may arise. Such advances are incorporated within their respective genus and should be recognized as being functionally equivalent or structurally equivalent to the aspect shown or described.

#A function or an act should be interpreted as incorporating all modes of performing the function or act, unless otherwise explicitly stated.