# US 11,115,931 B2 · Uplink interference avoidance under closed loop power control conditions

> Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt

- Number: US 11,115,931 B2
- Document ID: US11115931B2
- Status: Granted
- Kind: B2
- Application number: 16/929,213
- Filed: 2020-07-15
- Published: 2020-10-29
- Granted: 2021-09-07
- Earliest claimed: 2019-04-18
- Assignees: AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.; AT&T Technical Services Company, Inc.
- Applicants: AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.; AT&T Technical Services Company, Inc.
- Inventors: Daniel Vivanco; Arthur Brisebois; David Ross Beppler; Thomas Henderson
- Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US11115931B2

## CPC

- H04W 52/08: Closed loop power control
- H04W 52/12: Outer and inner loops
- H04W 52/146: {Uplink power control}
- H04W 52/243: {taking into account interferences}
- H04W 52/265: {taking into account the quality of service QoS}
- H04W 52/286: {during data packet transmission, e.g. high speed packet access [HSPA]}
- H04W 52/367: {Power values between minimum and maximum limits, e.g. dynamic range}
- H04W: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (broadcast communication H04H; communication systems using wireless links for non-selective communication, e.g. wireless extensions H04M1/72)

## Abstract

Various embodiments disclosed herein provide for facilitating uplink interference avoidance. According an embodiment, a system can comprise receiving a request to adjust an uplink power limit of a first communication device that is generating an uplink interference above a threshold and a power adjustment value employable to adjust the uplink power limit of the first communication device. The system can further facilitate identifying a packet flow in an uplink communication with the first communication device, wherein use of the packet flow results in generating of the uplink interference above the threshold. The system can further facilitate determining whether the uplink power limit of the first communication device is able to be adjusted based on a quality of service allocated to the packet flow. The system can further facilitate transmitting a message to update the uplink power limit of the first communication device using the power adjustment value.

## Claims

### Claim 1

A system, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory that stores executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, facilitate performance of operations, comprising:
identifying a packet flow in an uplink communication with a first communication device, wherein use of the packet flow results in generating uplink interference from the first communication device above the threshold; and
in response to determining that an uplink power limit of the first communication device is adjustable based on a quality of service class identifier value allocated to the packet flow, transmitting a message to update the uplink power limit of the first communication device using a power adjustment value, wherein the class identifier value is associated with a content type of the packet flow.

### Claim 2 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:
in response to determining that the uplink power limit of the first communication device is unable to be adjusted, initiating a search to identify a second communication device that is engaged in an uplink transmission.

### Claim 3 (depends on 2)

The system of claim 2, wherein the operations further comprise:
evaluating a first quality of service class identifier value of the first communication device and a second quality of service class identifier value of the second communication device to determine whether an uplink power setting of the second communication device is adjustable.

### Claim 4 (depends on 3)

The system of claim 3, wherein the operations further comprise:
in response to the first quality of service class identifier value being determined to be equal to the second quality of service class identifier of the second communication device, evaluating a first alternate parameter of the first communication device and a second alternate uplink power parameter of the second communication device.

### Claim 5 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the power adjustment value comprises an uplink power correction value that facilitates reducing the uplink interference generated by the first communication device.

### Claim 6 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:
in response to the determining that the uplink power limit of the first communication device is unable to be adjusted, identifying a group of additional communication devices having the uplink interference with respect to an external system.

### Claim 7 (depends on 1)

The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:
in response to the determining that the uplink power limit of the first communication device is unable to be adjusted, evaluating a location value, an uplink power control value, and a quality of service class identifier value associated with an active application of additional communication devices having the uplink interference with respect to an external system.

### Claim 8

A method, comprising:
identifying, by network equipment comprising a processor, a packet flow in an uplink communication with a first communication device, wherein use of the packet flow results in generating of uplink interference from the first communication device; and
in response to determining that an uplink power limit of the first communication device is able to be adjusted based on a quality of service class identifier value allocated to the packet flow, transmitting, by the system, a message to update the uplink power limit of the first communication device using a power adjustment value wherein the class identifier value is associated with a content type of the packet flow.

### Claim 9 (depends on 8)

The method of claim 8, further comprising:
in response to determining that the uplink power limit of the first communication device is unable to be adjusted, initiating, by the network equipment, a search to identify a second communication device that is engaged in an uplink transmission.

### Claim 10 (depends on 9)

The method of claim 9, further comprising:
evaluating, by the network equipment, a first quality of service class identifier value of the first communication device and a second quality of service class identifier value of the second communication device to determine whether an uplink power setting of the second communication device is able to be adjusted.

### Claim 11 (depends on 10)

The method of claim 10, further comprising:
in response to the first quality of service class identifier value being determined to be equal to the second quality of service class identifier of the second communication device, evaluating, by the network equipment, a first alternate parameter of the first communication device and a second alternate uplink power parameter of the second communication device.

### Claim 12 (depends on 8)

The method of claim 8, wherein the power adjustment value comprises an uplink power correction value that facilitates reducing the uplink interference generated by the first communication device.

### Claim 13 (depends on 8)

The method of claim 8, further comprising:
in response to the determining that the uplink power limit of the first communication device is unable to be adjusted, identifying, by the network equipment, a group of additional communication devices having the uplink interference in association with an external system.

### Claim 14 (depends on 8)

The method of claim 8, further comprising:
in response to the determining that the uplink power limit of the first communication device is unable to be adjusted, evaluating, by the network equipment, a location value, uplink power control value, and a quality of service class identifier value associated with an active application of additional communication devices having the uplink interference in association with an external system.

### Claim 15

A non-transitory machine-readable medium, comprising executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, facilitate performance of operations, comprising:
identifying a packet flow in an uplink communication with a first user equipment, wherein use of the packet flow results in generating of uplink interference from the first user equipment above the threshold; and
in response to determining that an uplink power limit of the first user equipment is adjustable based on a quality of service class identifier value allocated to the packet flow and associated with a content type of the packet flow, transmitting a message to update the uplink power limit of the first user equipment using a power adjustment value.

### Claim 16 (depends on 15)

The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise:
in response to determining that the uplink power limit of the first user equipment is unable to be adjusted, initiating a search to identify a second user equipment that is engaged in an uplink transmission.

### Claim 17 (depends on 16)

The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the operations further comprise:
evaluating a first quality of service class identifier value of the first user equipment and a second quality of service class identifier value of the second user equipment to determine whether an uplink power setting of the second user equipment is adjustable.

### Claim 18 (depends on 17)

The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise:
in response to the first quality of service class identifier value being determined to be equal to the second quality of service class identifier of the second user equipment, evaluating a first alternate parameter of the first user equipment and a second alternate uplink power parameter of the second user equipment.

### Claim 19 (depends on 15)

The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the power adjustment value comprises an uplink power correction value that facilitates reducing the uplink interference generated by the first user equipment.

### Claim 20 (depends on 15)

The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise:
in response to the determining that the uplink power limit of the first user equipment is unable to be adjusted, identifying a group of additional user equipment having generated the uplink interference into an external system.
