# US 11,115,065 B2 · Method and apparatus for dynamic tuning > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 11,115,065 B2 - Document ID: US11115065B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 16/572,113 - Filed: 2019-09-16 - Published: 2020-01-09 - Granted: 2021-09-07 - Earliest claimed: 2016-07-25 - Assignees: NXP USA, Inc. - Applicants: NXP USA, Inc. - Inventors: Matthew Russell Greene; David Michael Schlueter - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US11115065B2 ## CPC - H04B 1/0057: {using diplexing or multiplexing filters for selecting the desired band} - H04B 1/006: {using switches for selecting the desired band (H04B1/0057 takes precedence)} - H04B 1/0458: {Arrangements for matching and coupling between power amplifier and antenna or between amplifying stages (matching circuits in general H03H)} - H04B 1/18: Input circuits, e.g. for coupling to an antenna or a transmission line (coupling networks between antennas or lines and receivers independent of the nature of the receiver H03H) - H04L 5/14: Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex - H04W 24/10: Scheduling measurement reports {; Arrangements for measurement reports} - H04B: TRANSMISSION - H04L: TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION (arrangements common to telegraphic and telephonic communication H04M) - H04W: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (broadcast communication H04H; communication systems using wireless links for non-selective communication, e.g. wireless extensions H04M1/72) ## Abstract A system that incorporates teachings of the subject disclosure may include, for example, adjusting a matching network utilizing a weighted tuning state determined according to an application of a first weighting factor to multiple tuning states based on enhancing performance associated with different types of operation, including transmit, receive, and duplex operation. A weighted reference metric is determined based on a second weighting factor and first, second and third reference metrics selected from first, second and third groups of reference metrics based on the enhancing performance associated with the different types of operation. The tuning is continued utilizing the weighted tuning state, responsive to a first determination that a first performance metric satisfies a first threshold according to a comparison of the first performance metric to the weighted reference metric. Other embodiments are disclosed. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A communication device, comprising: a processing system including a processor; and a memory that stores executable instructions that, when executed by the processing system, facilitate performance of operations, the operations comprising: during frequency division duplex (FDD) communication, adjusting a matching network including a tunable reactive element utilizing a weighted tuning state resulting in a tuning, wherein the weighted tuning state is determined from applying a first weighting factor to first, second, and third tuning states that are predetermined tuning states based on increasing performance in transmit, receive and duplex operation, respectively, wherein the first, second and third tuning states comprise sets of digital to analog converter values, and wherein the first weighting factor is based on an interpolation that utilizes digital to analog converter values of at least two of the first, second and third tuning states; determining a weighted reference metric based on a second weighting factor, and first, second and third reference metrics, the first, second and third reference metrics selected from first, second and third groups of reference metrics, wherein the first, second and third groups of reference metrics are expected metrics based on the increasing performance in the transmit, receive and duplex operation, respectively; responsive to the tuning, determining a first performance metric according to a first measurement associated with the FDD communication; and responsive to a first determination that the first performance metric satisfies a first threshold according to a first comparison of the first performance metric to the weighted reference metric, continuing the tuning utilizing the weighted tuning state. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The communication device of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: responsive to a second determination that the first performance metric does not satisfy the first threshold according to the first comparison, selecting fourth, fifth and sixth reference metrics from the first, second and third groups of reference metrics, respectively. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The communication device of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: responsive to the first determination: determining a second performance metric according to a second measurement associated with the FDD communication; comparing the second performance metric to a second reference metric resulting in a second comparison; responsive to a second determination that the second performance metric does not satisfy a second threshold according to the second comparison, selecting fourth, fifth and sixth reference metrics from the first, second and third groups of reference metrics, respectively; and responsive to a third determination that the second performance metric satisfies the second threshold according to the second comparison, continuing the tuning. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The communication device of claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third reference metrics comprise input reflection coefficients. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The communication device of claim 1, wherein the first weighting factor is determined based on an operational function of the communication device. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) The communication device of claim 5, wherein the operational function comprises downloading an amount of data above a download threshold, and wherein the first weighting factor is biased towards the increasing performance in the receive operation. ### Claim 7 (depends on 5) The communication device of claim 5, wherein the operational function comprises transmitting an amount of data above an upload threshold, and wherein the first weighting factor is biased towards the increasing performance in the transmit operation. ### Claim 8 (depends on 5) The communication device of claim 5, wherein the operations further comprise: monitoring a transmit power level; and determining a link margin based on the monitoring, wherein the operational function comprises a determination that the link margin is equal to or below a link margin threshold, and wherein the first weighting factor is biased towards the increasing performance in the transmit operation. ### Claim 9 (depends on 5) The communication device of claim 5, wherein the operational function of the communication device comprises a particular application being executed at the communication device. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The communication device of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise: monitoring a receive metric associated with a received signal during the FDD communication; and determining a link margin based on the monitoring, wherein the operational function comprises a determination that the link margin is equal to or below a link margin threshold, and wherein the first weighting factor is biased towards the increasing performance in the receive operation. ### Claim 11 (depends on 9) The communication device of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise monitoring resource block allocation for the FDD communication, and wherein the operational function is determined based on the monitoring. ### Claim 12 (depends on 9) The communication device of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise monitoring data throughput for the FDD communication, and wherein the operational function is determined based on the monitoring. ### Claim 13 (depends on 9) The communication device of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise monitoring battery level during the FDD communication, and wherein the operational function is determined based on the monitoring. ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) The communication device of claim 1, wherein the first, second and third tuning states comprise tuning voltages, and wherein the tunable reactive element comprises a voltage tunable capacitor. ### Claim 15 A method comprising: adjusting, by a processing system of a communication device, the processing system including a processor, a matching network utilizing a weighted tuning state resulting in a tuning, wherein the weighted tuning state is determined from applying a first weighting factor to first, second and third tuning states that are predetermined tuning states based on increasing performance in transmit, receive and duplex operation, respectively, wherein the first, second and third tuning states comprise sets of digital to analog converter values, and wherein the first weighting factor is based on an interpolation that utilizes digital to analog converter values of at least two of the first, second and third tuning states; determining, by the processor, a weighted reference metric based on a second weighting factor, and first, second and third reference metrics, the first, second and third reference metrics selected from first, second and third groups of reference metrics, wherein the first, second and third groups of reference metrics are expected metrics based on the increasing performance in the transmit, receive and duplex operation, respectively; and responsive to a first determination that a first measured performance metric satisfies a first threshold according to a first comparison of the first measured performance metric to the weighted reference metric, continuing, by the processing system, the tuning utilizing the weighted tuning state. ### Claim 16 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15, wherein the first and second weighting factors are the same, and further comprising: responsive to a second determination that the first measured performance metric does not satisfy the first threshold according to the first comparison, selecting, by the processing system, fourth, fifth and sixth tuning states. ### Claim 17 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15, further comprising, responsive to the first determination: determining, by the processing system, a second measured performance metric according to a second measurement; responsive to a second determination that the second measured performance metric does not satisfy a second threshold according to a second comparison, selecting, by the processing system, fourth, fifth and sixth tuning states, the second comparison comprising a comparison of the second measured performance metric to the second reference metric; and responsive to a third determination that the second measured performance metric satisfies the second threshold according to the second comparison, continuing, by the processing system, the tuning. ### Claim 18 A non-transitory, machine-readable storage medium, comprising executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, facilitate performance of operations, the operations comprising: adjusting a matching network utilizing a weighted tuning state resulting in a tuning, wherein the weighted tuning state is determined according to an application of a first weighting factor to multiple tuning states based on enhancing performance associated with different types of operation, wherein the different types of operation include transmit, receive, and duplex wherein the multiple tuning states comprise sets of digital to analog converter values, and wherein the first weighting factor is based on an interpolation that utilizes digital to analog converter values of at least two of the multiple tuning states; determining a weighted reference metric based on a second weighting factor and first, second and third reference metrics, wherein the first, second and third reference metrics are selected from first, second and third groups of reference metrics, and wherein the first, second and third groups of reference metrics are based on the enhancing performance associated with the different types of operation; and responsive to a first determination that a first performance metric satisfies a first threshold according to a comparison of the first performance metric to the weighted reference metric, continuing the tuning utilizing the weighted tuning state. ### Claim 19 (depends on 18) The non-transitory, machine-readable storage medium of claim 18, wherein the different types of operation further include aggregated receive, carrier aggregation, or both. ### Claim 20 (depends on 18) The non-transitory, machine-readable storage medium of claim 18, wherein the operations further comprise: responsive to a second determination that the first performance metric does not satisfy the first threshold according to the comparison, selecting other multiple tuning states.