# US 11,079,512 B2 · System and method for analysis of fissionable materials by multispectral active neutron interrogation analysis > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 11,079,512 B2 - Document ID: US11079512B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 16/296,588 - Filed: 2019-03-08 - Published: 2020-01-23 - Granted: 2021-08-03 - Earliest claimed: 2014-01-16 - Assignees: University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. - Applicants: University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. - Inventors: Kelly A. Jordan; Jason M. Lewis - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US11079512B2 ## CPC - G01V 5/281: {detecting special nuclear material [SNM], e.g. Uranium-235, Uranium-233 or Plutonium-239} - G01V: GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS (means for indicating the location of accidentally buried, e.g. snow-buried, persons A63B29/02) ## Abstract The detection and assay of fissionable material is carried out on a container known or suspected to have a material with at least one fissionable isotope. The material is irradiated with neutrons from two or more different neutron sources. The fission rates inducted at each irradiation energy are acquired with at least one neutron detector. A multispectral active neutron interrogation analysis (MANIA) is carried out to compare the detected fission rates of the neutron spectra with calculated fission rates where an iterative algorithm is carried out on a system of linear equations to solve for the isotopic composition of one or more isotopes to determine the presence, identity, and quantities of fissionable isotopes in said container. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method of assaying fissionable material, comprising: providing a material comprising at least one fissionable isotope; sequentially irradiating said material with a plurality of incident neutron energies from a plurality of different neutron sources; acquiring detected fission rates induced in said material at said plurality of incident neutron energies using at least one neutron detector; performing, by processing circuitry, a multispectral active neutron interrogation analysis (MANIA), where said detected fission rates are compared to calculated fission rates for isotopic compositions of at least one isotope by an iterative analysis using a system of linear equations, wherein an identity and a quantity of one or more of said at least one fissionable isotope in said material are determined based at least in part upon said comparison of said detected fission rates to said calculated fission rates; and providing, by said processing circuitry, an indication of said identity and quantity of said one or more fissionable isotope in said material. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of different neutron sources comprises a D,D generator, a D,T generator, a radioisotope source, or a nuclear reactor. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said at least one neutron detector comprises a 4He gas scintillation detector. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said MANIA comprises: inputting a geometry of irradiation of said material; inputting said detected fission rates; and performing, by processing circuitry, an iterative calculation and comparison comprising: a) obtaining an anticipated fissionable isotope composition as a test fissionable isotope composition; b) calculating expected fission rates for said test fissionable isotope composition; c) comparing said expected fission rates and said detected fission rates; d) in response to said comparison, outputting said indication of said identity and quantity of said one or more fissionable isotope if said expected fission rates and said detected fission rates are within a defined threshold of each other, otherwise proceeding to step e); e) calculating effective fission cross-sections; f) updating said test fissionable isotope composition from said calculated effective fission cross-sections; and g) proceeding to step b) to calculate expected fission rates using said updated test fissionable isotope composition. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4, wherein said geometry of irradiation is constructed for use with a cargo container, a rail car, a nuclear waste stream container, a spent fuel cell, or a nuclear material enrichment sample container. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said iterative analysis uses an iteratively updated Monte Carlo N-particle transport (MCNP) model. ### Claim 7 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, wherein microscopic fission cross-sections for said MCNP model are iteratively updated in response to said expected fission rates and said detected fission rates not being within said defined threshold. ### Claim 8 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, wherein said comparison is based upon a least squares solution. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said identity and quantity of said one or more fissionable isotope are related to fission rates by said system of linear equations. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The method of claim 9, wherein said system of linear equations is defined by a matrix of microscopic fission cross-sections and flux. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said calculated fission rates are determined based upon an anticipated fissionable isotope composition. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein said material is within a cargo container, a rail car, a nuclear waste stream container, a spent fuel cell, or a nuclear material enrichment sample container.