# US 11,079,375 B2 · Method for determining active concentrations and/or kinetic interaction constants in complex biological samples by means of surface plasmon resonance > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 11,079,375 B2 - Document ID: US11079375B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 16/083,529 - Filed: 2017-03-28 - Published: 2020-01-30 - Granted: 2021-08-03 - Earliest claimed: 2016-03-29 - Assignees: Universite De Bordeaux; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Bordeaux; Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique; Inserm (Institut National De La Sante Et De La Recherche Medicale) - Applicants: Universite De Bordeaux; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Bordeaux; Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique; Inserm (Institut National De La Sante Et De La Recherche Medicale) - Inventors: Jonathan Visentin; Carmelo Di Primo; Jean-Luc Taupin - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US11079375B2 ## CPC - G01N 33/54373: {involving physiochemical end-point determination, e.g. wave-guides, FETS, gratings} - G01N 21/553: {and using surface plasmons (fluorescence excitation G01N21/648; enhanced Raman G01N21/658)} - G01N 33/543: with an insoluble carrier for immobilising immunochemicals - G01N 33/564: for pre-existing immune complex or autoimmune disease {, i.e. systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid factors or complement components C1-C9} - G01N 33/56977: {HLA or MHC typing} - G01N 33/6854: {Immunoglobulins} - G01N: INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES (measuring or testing apparatus or processes other than immunoassay, involving enzymes or microorganisms C12M, C12Q) ## Abstract The invention relates to a method for determining active concentrations of an analyte and optionally kinetic constants for the interaction of the analyte with a ligand in complex biological samples by means of surface plasmon resonance comprising the use of an auto-blank. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method for determining, by surface plasmon resonance in complex biological samples, active concentrations of an analyte and optionally kinetic constants of interaction of the analyte with a ligand, comprising providing a surface plasmon resonance chip on which a capture agent specific to a ligand of the analyte is immobilized; capture, by the capture agent, of a control ligand that does not bind the analyte to be tested; passage of the sample over the chip, injected at a determined flow rate for a determined duration and obtaining a sensorgram for the control ligand; regeneration of the surface to remove the captured control ligand from the capture agent; capture, by the capture agent, of a ligand that binds the analyte to be tested; passage of the sample over the chip, injected at the same determined flow rate for the same determined duration and obtaining a sensorgram for the analyte; subtraction of the sensorgram obtained with the control ligand from the sensorgram obtained with the ligand that binds the analyte to be tested; and calculation of the active concentration of the analyte and optionally kinetic constants of interaction of the analyte with the ligand, and characterized in that the control ligand and the ligand that binds the analyte to be tested are of a similar mass and the control ligand and the ligand that binds the analyte to be tested are captured in equivalent amounts by the capture agent. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the complex biological sample is selected from serum, plasma, urine, lavage liquids, ascites, biopsy eluates and cell culture media. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the complex biological sample is serum or plasma. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the sample is injected at least two different flow rates and that the active concentration of the analyte in the complex biological sample is calculated. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the sample is injected at different concentrations and that the kinetic constants of interaction of the analyte with the ligand in the complex biological sample are calculated. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the analyte-ligand pair is chosen from an antibody-antigen pair, a ligand-receptor pair or a xenobiotic-molecular target pair. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the analyte is an anti-HLA antibody, the control ligand is an HLA antigen not recognized by the antibody to be tested and the ligand that binds the analyte to be tested is a target HLA antigen of the antibody to be tested. ### Claim 8 (depends on 7) The method as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that the sample undergoes one or more prior treatments chosen from a heat treatment, a treatment with dithiothreitol (DTT), a step of purification of the IgGs on a protein G resin, a step of concentration of the sample, a step of dialysis, in particular with a cut-off threshold of 100 kDa, and a combination of several of these treatments. ### Claim 9 (depends on 8) The method as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that the sample previously undergoes a combination of a heat treatment and a step of purification of the IgGs on a protein G resin. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The method as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that the method comprises a prior step in which the anti-HLA antibodies in the sample are detected. ### Claim 11 (depends on 8) The method as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that the method comprises a prior step in which the anti-HLA antibodies in the sample are detected.