# US 10,767,619 B2 · Integrated system for optimal extraction of head-driven tidal energy with minimal or no adverse environmental effects > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,767,619 B2 - Document ID: US10767619B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 16/787,939 - Filed: 2020-02-11 - Published: 2020-06-25 - Granted: 2020-09-08 - Earliest claimed: 2017-08-15 - Assignees: University of North Florida Board of Trustees - Applicants: Brian Thomas Kopp; Donald Thomas Resio; Michelle Ann Vieira; Abdallah Walid Mohamed Kamal El Safty - Inventors: Brian Thomas Kopp; Donald Thomas Resio; Michelle Ann Vieira; Abdallah Walid Mohamed Kamal El Safty - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10767619B2 ## CPC - F03B 13/26: using tide energy - F03B 17/02: using hydrostatic thrust - H02K 7/1823: {structurally associated with turbines or similar engines} - E02B 9/08: Tide or wave power plants (water-pressure machines, tide or wave motors F03B) - F05B 2240/123: Nozzles - Y02E 10/20: Hydro energy - Y02E 10/30: Energy from the sea, e.g. using wave energy or salinity gradient - F03B: MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS (positive-displacement engines for liquid F03C; machines for liquids and gases F01; positive-displacement machines for liquids F04, rotary fluid gearing of the hydrokinetic type F16H41/00) - H02K: DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES (dynamo-electric relays H01H53/00; conversion of DC or AC input power into surge output power {H03K3/53}) - E02B: HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING (ship-lifting E02C; dredging E02F) - F05B: INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G - Y02E: REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION ## Abstract A closed system that captures energy derived from the head differential rather than open-water flows velocities while reducing potential environmental damages and costly maintenance due to bio-fouling. This energy density available in a tidal range is increased substantially via convergent “nozzles” to produce an optimal speed for power generations with the turbine sections, thereby significantly increasing the tidal energy captured by this system, even at sites where tidal energy is low (e.g., small to medium tide ranges, such as found along the East and Gulf Coasts of the United States). ## Claims ### Claim 1 A system for optimal extraction of head-driven tidal energy with minimal negative environmental effects, the system comprising: a closed on-shore bladder located at a local mean sea level; a closed off-shore bladder in communication with the on-shore bladder; a liquid at least partially disposed within one of the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder, the liquid adapted to flow between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder depending on a pressure differential between the bladders; a turbine housing disposed between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder; and a hydropower turbine disposed within the turbine housing, wherein the turbine captures potential energy derived from head differentials over a tidal cycle between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder; wherein head-driven tidal energy is captured when a water level above the off-shore bladder rises or falls, thereby altering the pressure differential between the bladders, and thereby altering a flow velocity of the liquid between the off-shore bladder and the on-shore bladder. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the on-shore bladder is oversized, such that the on-shore bladder is adapted to contain a total volume of the liquid in the system. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The system of claim 2, wherein the oversized nature of the on-shore bladder allows the on-shore bladder to expand upward and contract downward depending on a water level above the off-shore bladder, thereby maximizing the pressure differential between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein the off-shore bladder is oversized, such that the off-shore bladder is adapted to contain a total volume of the liquid in the system. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The system of claim 4, wherein the oversized nature of the off-shore bladder allows the off-shore bladder to expand upward and contract downward depending on the water level above the off-shore bladder, thereby maximizing the pressure differential between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, wherein each of the off-shore bladder and the on-shore bladder is made of a compliant material, such that each of the bladders allows the liquid to flow between the bladders with minimal lost energy due to friction, thereby maximizing the head-driven tidal energy extracted from the system. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, further comprising: a generator in communication with the hydropower turbine; and a pressure-sensing shut-off valve in communication with the off-shore bladder, wherein the shut-off valve is opened when a pressure differential of a water level above the off-shore bladder is sufficient to generate optimal power from the flow of the liquid through the generator, wherein opening the shut-off valve permits head-driven flow of the liquid to flow through the generator. ### Claim 8 (depends on 7) The system of claim 7, wherein the shut-off valve is closed when the pressure differential above the off-shore bladder reduces to a value that is insufficient for optimal power generation. ### Claim 9 (depends on 8) The system of claim 8, wherein the shut-off valve remains closed until the lowering water above the off-shore bladder attains a potential pressure differential capable of producing optimal negative flow for power generation in the offshore direction. ### Claim 10 (depends on 7) The system of claim 7, wherein the off-shore and on-shore bladders include manifolds on each side of the generator to cause flow velocity to increase as the flow approaches the generator. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The system of claim 1, further comprising a control system that maintains the flow velocity in an optimal velocity range for the hydropower turbine, thus enabling maximum energy extraction. ### Claim 12 A closed system for optimal extraction of head-driven tidal energy with minimal negative environmental effects, the system comprising: an on-shore bladder located at a local mean sea level; an off-shore bladder in communication with the on-shore bladder; a liquid at least partially disposed within one of the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder, the liquid adapted to flow between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder depending on a pressure differential between the bladders; a hydropower turbine disposed between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder, wherein the turbine captures potential energy derived from head differentials over a tidal cycle between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder; a generator in communication with the hydropower turbine; and a pressure-sensing shut-off valve in communication with the off-shore bladder, wherein the shut-off valve is opened when a pressure differential of a water level above the off-shore bladder is sufficient to generate optimal power from the flow of the liquid through the generator, wherein opening the shut-off valve permits head-driven flow of the liquid to flow through the generator at a flow velocity. ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The system of claim 12, wherein each of the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder is oversized, such that each of the bladders is adapted to contain a total volume of the liquid in the system at a given time. ### Claim 14 (depends on 13) The system of claim 13, wherein the oversized nature of each of the off-shore bladder and the on-shore bladder allows each bladder to expand upward and contract downward depending on the water level above the off-shore bladder, thereby maximizing the pressure differential between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder. ### Claim 15 (depends on 12) The system of claim 12, wherein each of the off-shore bladder and the on-shore bladder is made of a compliant material, such that each of the bladders allows the liquid to flow between the bladders with minimal lost energy due to friction, thereby maximizing the head-driven tidal energy extracted from the system. ### Claim 16 (depends on 12) The system of claim 12, wherein the shut-off valve is closed when the pressure differential above the off-shore bladder reduces to a value that is insufficient for optimal power generation. ### Claim 17 (depends on 16) The system of claim 16, wherein the shut-off valve remains closed until the lowering water above the off-shore bladder attains a potential pressure differential capable of producing optimal negative flow for power generation in the offshore direction. ### Claim 18 (depends on 12) The system of claim 12, wherein the off-shore and on-shore bladders include manifolds on each side of the generator to cause flow velocity to increase as the flow approaches the generator. ### Claim 19 (depends on 18) The system of claim 18, further comprising a control system including the manifolds, the control system maintaining the flow velocity in an optimal velocity range for the hydropower turbine, thus enabling maximum energy extraction. ### Claim 20 A closed tidal energy system, comprising: an on-shore bladder located at a local mean sea level; an off-shore bladder in communication with the on-shore bladder; a liquid at least partially disposed within one of the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder, the liquid adapted to flow between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder depending on a pressure differential between the bladders; a turbine housing disposed between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder; a hydropower turbine disposed within the turbine housing, wherein the turbine captures potential energy derived from head differentials over a tidal cycle between the on-shore bladder and the off-shore bladder; a generator in communication with the hydropower turbine; a pressure-sensing shut-off valve in communication with the off-shore bladder, wherein the shut-off valve is opened when a pressure differential of a water level above the off-shore bladder is sufficient to generate optimal power from the flow through the generator, wherein opening the shut-off valve permits head-driven flow to flow through the generator, wherein the off-shore and on-shore bladders include manifolds on each side of the generator to cause flow velocity to increase as the flow approaches the generator; a control system, including the manifolds, that maintains the flow velocity in an optimal velocity range for the hydropower turbine, thus enabling maximum energy extraction, wherein the shut-off valve is closed when the pressure differential above the off-shore bladder reduces to a value that is insufficient for optimal power generation, wherein the shut-off valve remains closed until the lowering water above the off-shore bladder attains a potential pressure differential capable of producing optimal negative flow for power generation in the offshore direction.