# US 10,766,605 B2 · Emergency control of an aircraft > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,766,605 B2 - Document ID: US10766605B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 15/767,540 - Filed: 2016-10-18 - Published: 2018-10-25 - Granted: 2020-09-08 - Earliest claimed: 2015-10-19 - Assignees: BAE SYSTEMS plc - Applicants: BAE SYSTEMS plc - Inventors: Matthew Frank Offredi; Clive David Goodchild - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10766605B2 ## CPC - B64C 13/18: using automatic pilot - B64C 13/22: readily revertible to personal control - B64D 11/00: Passenger or crew accommodation; Flight-deck installations not otherwise provided for - B64D 45/0034: {by ground-control override} - B64D 45/0056: {detecting passenger or crew behavior by sensors, e.g. biometrics} - G05D 1/00: Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots (drive control systems specially adapted for autonomous road vehicles B60W60/00) - G06T 7/248: {involving reference images or patches} - G08G 5/26: Transmission of traffic-related information between aircraft and ground stations - G08G 5/55: for a single aircraft - G08G 5/58: for emergency situations, e.g. hijacking or bird strikes - G10L 25/48: specially adapted for particular use - B64C: AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS - B64D: EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT - G05D: SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES - G06T: IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL - G08G: TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS (guiding railway traffic, ensuring the safety of railway traffic B61L; arrangement of road signs or traffic signals E01F9/00; radar or analogous systems, sonar systems, lidar systems specially adapted for traffic control G01S13/91, G01S15/88, G01S17/88; {radar or analogous systems, sonar systems, lidar systems specially adapted for anti-collision purposes G01S13/93, G01S15/93, G01S17/93}) - G10L: SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING ## Abstract An aircraft emergency control system comprises at least one sensor (104A, 104B, 104C) configured to output an electronic signal relating to detection of incapacitation of at least one aircraft crew member. A processor (108) is configured to receive and process the electronic signal to determine whether emergency action is to be taken. A control unit (114) is configured to communicate, in use, a control signal to an avionics system (116) of the aircraft (100) in relation to the emergency action if the processor determines that emergency action is to be taken. ## Claims ### Claim 1 An aircraft emergency control system, the system comprising: at least one sensor configured to output an electronic signal relating to detection of incapacitation of at least one aircraft crew member; a processor configured to receive and process the electronic signal to determine whether an emergency action is to be taken and to generate a plurality of emergency routes for flying the aircraft to an emergency landing destination; and a control unit configured to communicate, in use, a control signal to an avionics system of the aircraft in relation to the emergency action if the processor determines that the emergency action is to be taken, wherein one of emergency routes is selected in response to taking the emergency action based on a score assigned to each of a plurality of sections of each of the emergency routes. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor comprises an imaging device, and the processor is configured to analyse images encoded in the electronic signals of the imaging device in order to detect movement of the at least one crew member, and determine that the emergency action is to be taken if no said movement is detected during a predetermined period of time. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor comprises an audio device, and the processor is configured to analyse audio data encoded in the electronic signals of the audio device, and determine that the emergency action is to be taken if no said audio data indicating speech and/or movement of the at least one crew member is detected during a predetermined period of time. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor is configured to provide an electronic signal representing operation of at least one controller of the aircraft by the at least one crew member, and the processor is configured to determine that the emergency action is to be taken if the electronic signal representing operation of the at least one controller of the aircraft indicates that the at least one controller has not been operated during a predetermined period of time. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein the system is configured to, in use, transfer data relating to the selected emergency route to a Flight Management System of the aircraft and uses an auto-pilot system of the aircraft to implement the selected emergency route. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein the system further comprises a communications interface configured, in use, to establish an authenticated communications link with a remote station, and transfers data relating to the selected emergency route onto the remote station. ### Claim 7 (depends on 6) The system according to claim 6, wherein the system is operable in: a first mode wherein the system is configured to generate or modify the selected emergency route without support from the remote station and to control the aircraft to implement the selected emergency route, and/or the system is able to allow an authenticated onboard crew member to regain manual control of the aircraft from the system, or a second mode wherein input from the remote station is required for generation or modification of the selected emergency route and to allow the system to implement the selected emergency route, and/or input from the remote station is required to allow an authenticated onboard crew member to regain manual control of the aircraft from the system. ### Claim 8 (depends on 6) The system according to claim 6, wherein if the authenticated communications link between the system and the remote station is active in use then the system is disabled from modifying the selected emergency route, and if the authenticated communications link between the system and the remote station is lost in use then the system is enabled to modify the selected emergency route. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein the system is configured to generate the plurality of emergency routes by: assigning the scores to each of the plurality of potential emergency routes; and selecting one of the plurality of emergency routes for implementation based on the assigned scores; wherein assigning the scores to each of the plurality of emergency routes includes applying a demotion and/or a promotion factor to each section of the emergency routes based on at least one factor, wherein the at least one factor includes distance, flying altitude constraints, weather conditions, suitability in terms of aircraft fuel levels, collision risk, destination features, and/or destination runway features. ### Claim 10 (depends on 1) An aircraft including a system according to claim 1. ### Claim 11 A computer-implemented method of aircraft emergency control, the method comprising: receiving an electronic signal relating to detection of incapacitation of at least one aircraft crew member; processing the electronic signal to determine whether an emergency action is to be taken and to generate a plurality of emergency routes for flying the aircraft to an emergency landing destination; and if the processing determines that the emergency action is to be taken then communicating, in use, a control signal to an avionics system of the aircraft in relation to the emergency action, wherein one of emergency routes is selected in response to taking the emergency action based on a score assigned to each of a plurality of sections of each of the emergency routes. ### Claim 12 (depends on 11) The method according to claim 11, wherein if the processing determines that emergency action is to be taken then the method further comprises starting a timer for receiving a user input relating to prevention of the sending of the control signal to the avionics system. ### Claim 13 (depends on 11) The method according to claim 11, comprising disabling manual control of the aircraft while the at least one crew member is determined to be incapacitated. ### Claim 14 A computer program product including one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums including instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause a process to be carried out for aircraft emergency control, the process comprising: receiving an electronic signal relating to detection of incapacitation of at least one aircraft crew member; processing the electronic signal to determine whether an emergency action is to be taken and to generate a plurality of emergency routes for flying the aircraft to an emergency landing destination; and if the processing determines that the emergency action is to be taken then communicating, in use, a control signal to an avionics system of the aircraft in relation to the emergency action, wherein one of emergency routes is selected in response to taking the emergency action based on a score assigned to each of a plurality of sections of each of the emergency routes. ### Claim 15 (depends on 14) The computer program product according to claim 14, wherein if the processing determines that emergency action is to be taken then the process further comprises starting a timer for receiving a user input relating to prevention of the sending of the control signal to the avionics system. ### Claim 16 (depends on 14) The computer program product according to claim 14, the process further comprising disabling manual control of the aircraft while the at least one crew member is determined to be incapacitated. ### Claim 17 (depends on 14) The computer program product according to claim 14, the process further comprising at least one of: analysing image and/or audio data to detect speech and/or movement of the at least one crew member; determining that the emergency action is to be taken if no said speech and/or movement is detected during a predetermined period of time; and determining that the emergency action is to be taken if an expected electronic signal has not been received during a predetermined period of time. ### Claim 18 (depends on 14) The computer program product according to claim 14, the process further comprising engaging an auto-pilot system of the aircraft to implement the selected emergency route. ### Claim 19 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein the selected emergency route has a highest score assigned to each of a plurality of sections of each of the emergency routes. ### Claim 20 (depends on 1) The system according to claim 1, wherein at least one score is a function of a multiplier and/or fixed offset value based on overlap of coordinates of at least one section of the selected emergency route and coordinates of a 3D polygon.