# US 10,482,758 B1 · Detecting destruction of an automation system component > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,482,758 B1 - Document ID: US10482758B1 - Status: Granted - Kind: B1 - Application number: 15/728,218 - Filed: 2017-10-09 - Granted: 2019-11-19 - Earliest claimed: 2013-03-15 - Assignees: Vivint, Inc. - Applicants: Vivint, Inc. - Inventors: James E. Nye; Jungtaik Hwang - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10482758B1 ## CPC - G08B 29/046: {prevention of tampering with detection circuits} - G08B 25/14: Central alarm receiver or annunciator arrangements - G08B 29/06: Monitoring of the line circuits, e.g. signalling of line faults - G08B 29/10: Monitoring of the annunciator circuits - G08B 29/183: {Single detectors using dual technologies (G08B13/1672, G08B13/2448, G08B13/2494 take precedence)} - G08B: SIGNALLING SYSTEMS, e.g. PERSONAL CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS ## Abstract A control panel is used to monitor events within a security system or other automation system. In the event an intruder enters a physical location, the intruder may attempt to damage the control panel to disrupt its operation. One or more sensors of the control panel may detect disruption in the operation of the control panel. Example sensors may detect an impact force, sudden acceleration, removal from a mounted location, or disruption of communication with an input/output element, such as a display device. When an event is detected at the control panel itself, the control panel can send a signal to a remote service provider, and the remote service provider can follow-up with the customer. The control panel and/or remote service provider may also determine when the control panel loses partial or complete power loss to identify the disruption as a potential crash-and-smash entry. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method of monitoring a condition of a control panel of a security system, comprising: detecting, based at least in part on using at least one of an impact sensor, an anti-tamper switch, or an accelerometer, a control panel disruption event at the control panel; and comparing a value associated with the control panel disruption event with a plurality of thresholds; delaying a sending of a signal indicative of the control panel disruption event for a varying amount of time based at least in part on the comparing; and sending the signal to a back-end monitoring system based at least in part on the delaying. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein detecting the control panel disruption event is based at least in part on using the accelerometer and comprises: measuring a force detected by an accelerometer associated with the control panel; classifying the force measured by the accelerometer; categorizing the control panel disruption event at the control panel. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein detecting the control panel disruption event is based at least in part on using the anti-tamper switch and comprises: determining that the anti-tamper switch has been activated. ### Claim 4 (depends on 3) The method of claim 3, wherein determining that the anti-tamper switch has been activated comprises: determining that the control panel has been removed from a mounting surface, a mounting plate, or both. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein detecting the control panel disruption event is based at least in part on using the impact sensor comprises: detecting an impact force on the control panel. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the signal indicative of the control panel disruption event comprises a first signal, and further comprising: determining whether the control panel has lost power; and sending to the back-end monitoring system a second signal, wherein the second signal is indicative of whether the control panel of an automation system has lost power. ### Claim 7 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, further comprising: determining at least one of whether the control panel has lost primary power or has lost secondary power; wherein the second signal is based at least at in part on the determining at least one of whether the control panel has lost primary power or has lost secondary power. ### Claim 8 (depends on 7) The method recited in claim 7, wherein the primary power is associated with an alternating current (AC) power supply and the secondary power is associated with a direct current (DC) power supply. ### Claim 9 (depends on 7) The method recited in claim 7, wherein determining at least one of whether the control panel has lost primary power or secondary power comprises; determining that the control panel has lost primary power and determining that the control panel has not lost secondary power; and wherein sending the signal indicative of whether the control panel of the automation system has lost power comprises: using the secondary power. ### Claim 10 (depends on 6) The method of claim 6, wherein the at least one of the impact sensor, the anti-tamper switch, or the accelerometer comprises at least a first sensor, and the determining whether the control panel has lost power is based at least in part on a second sensor. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: monitoring a status of the security system, wherein the status of the security system includes at least one of being armed or disarmed. ### Claim 12 (depends on 11) The method of claim 11, further comprising: determining, based at least in part on the monitoring, that the status of the security system is armed when the control panel disruption event was detected; and wherein, based at least in part on the determining that the status of the security system is armed, the sending the signal indicative of the control panel disruption event occurs immediately upon the detecting the control panel disruption event. ### Claim 13 (depends on 12) The method of claim 12, further comprising: sending, to the back-end monitoring system, an indication that the status of the security system was armed when the control panel disruption event was detected. ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the detecting the control panel disruption event is based at least in part on using the accelerometer and comprises measuring a force detected by an accelerometer associated with the control panel; and wherein the delaying the sending the signal indicative of the control panel disruption event is for a period of time related to the measured force. ### Claim 15 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the detecting the control panel disruption event is based at least in part on using the impact sensor and comprises detecting an amount of impact force; and wherein the delaying the sending the signal indicative of the control panel disruption event is for a period of time related to the detected amount of impact force. ### Claim 16 A control panel for a security system, comprising: a controller; a communication interface communicatively connected to the controller; a sensor configured to monitor a status of the control panel, wherein the sensor comprises at least one of an impact sensor, an anti-tamper switch, or an accelerometer; and computer readable media having computer executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the controller, cause the communication interface to: compare a value associated with a control panel disruption event with a plurality of thresholds; delay a sending of a signal indicative of the control panel disruption event for a varying amount of time based at least in part on the comparing; and transmit the signal upon delaying the signal indicative of the control panel disruption event. ### Claim 17 A method, comprising: at a service system remote from a control panel of a security system, monitoring a status of the control panel; receiving a delayed signal from the control panel, wherein the delayed signal is delayed for a varying amount of time based at least in part on comparing a value associated with a disruption event at the control panel with a plurality of thresholds; interpreting the delayed signal as indicative of the control panel having detected, using at least one of an impact sensor, an anti-tamper switch, or an accelerometer, the disruption event at the control panel itself; and determining that the disruption event is indicative of a crash-and-smash entry. ### Claim 18 (depends on 17) The method of claim 17, further comprising: selecting a follow-up procedure based at least in part on the determining that the disruption event is indicative of the crash-and-smash entry; initiating an action to implement the selected follow-up procedure.