# US 10,479,122 B2 · Printing head nozzle evaluation > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,479,122 B2 - Document ID: US10479122B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 13/811,296 - Filed: 2011-07-19 - Published: 2013-07-11 - Granted: 2019-11-19 - Earliest claimed: 2010-07-22 - Assignees: Xjet Ltd. - Applicants: Eliahu M. Kritchman; Timofey Shmal - Inventors: Eliahu M. Kritchman; Timofey Shmal - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10479122B2 ## CPC - B41J 29/393: Devices for controlling or analysing the entire machine {; Controlling or analysing mechanical parameters involving printing of test patterns} - B41J 2029/3935: {by means of printed test patterns} - B41J: TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS ## Abstract A method for evaluating performance of a plurality of nozzles of a printing head includes repeatedly operating each of the nozzles to print test marks on a surface of a substrate, each of the test marks printed by that nozzle being printed at a different time. At least once during the repeated operation of each of the nozzles, at least some of the test marks are erased from the surface. The test marks that were printed by that nozzle are inspected for a feature that is indicative of the performance of that nozzle. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method of selecting nozzles for printing a multi-layered line of metallic material, the method comprising: printing a first plurality of test marks using a plurality of nozzles and according to a set of parameters; printing a second plurality of test marks using the plurality of nozzles and according to the set of parameters; inspecting the first and second pluralities of test marks to determine whether test marks printed by a particular nozzle of the plurality nozzles are identical in appearance; identifying a set of test marks from the first and second pluralities of test marks that were printed by a particular nozzle and that are not identical in appearance; identifying the nozzle that printed the identified set of test marks; excluding the identified nozzle from the plurality of nozzles to generate a set of conforming nozzles; and using the set of conforming nozzles to print the multi-layered line of metallic material, wherein each nozzle in the set of conforming nozzles deposits metallic material to form a metallic layer within the multi-layered line of metallic material. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second pluralities of test marks are printed on a background; and wherein inspecting the first and second pluralities of test marks comprises acquiring an image of the background and each of the first and second pluralities of test marks; and inspecting the acquired image. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The method of claim 2, further comprising using the image to calculate optical heaviness, wherein the optical heaviness characterizes how grey each of the first and second plurality of test marks appears relative to a background. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising calculating one or more values that at least partially characterize each of the first and second pluralities of test marks. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more calculated values include position, orientation, length, width, or thickness. ### Claim 6 (depends on 4) The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more calculated values include at least one of: length, width, thickness, and position. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising inspecting the first and second pluralities of test marks to determine whether test marks printed by a particular nozzle conform to a predetermined criterion defining a nominal test mark position. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising inspecting the first and second pluralities of test marks to determine whether test marks printed by a particular nozzle vary in quality. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second pluralities of test marks are printed on an erasable reusable substrate. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The method of claim 9, wherein the substrate has a glass or ceramic surface. ### Claim 11 (depends on 9) The method of claim 9, further comprising erasing the substrate using mechanical abrasion, rubbing, or scrapping. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: evaluating stability of the plurality of nozzles by comparing test marks repeatedly printed by particular nozzles at different times, wherein the set of conforming nozzles includes nozzles that conform to a predetermined stability criteria. ### Claim 13 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the set of conforming nozzles consistently deposit a repeatable amount of the metallic printing fluid. ### Claim 14 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: assigning a score to each nozzle in the set of conforming nozzles, wherein the score is based on a relative importance of various properties of the test marks with respect to a particular printing application; and using nozzles with higher scores when the particular printing application requires fewer nozzles than are present in the set of conforming nozzles. ### Claim 15 A method of selecting nozzles for printing a multi-layered line of metallic material, the method comprising: printing a first plurality of test marks using a plurality of nozzles and according to a set of parameters; printing a second plurality of test marks using the plurality of nozzles and according to the set of parameters; inspecting individual test marks of the first and second pluralities of test marks to determine whether test marks printed by a particular nozzle are identical in appearance; assigning each of the plurality of nozzles a value representing an ability of each of the plurality of nozzles to print test marks that are identical in appearance; using the assigned values to identify a set of nozzles to be excluded from the plurality of nozzles; excluding the identified set of nozzles to generate a set of conforming nozzles; and using the set of conforming nozzles to print the multi-layered line of metallic material, wherein each nozzle in the set of conforming nozzles deposits metallic material to form a metallic layer within the multi-layered line of metallic material. ### Claim 16 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15, further comprising: repeatedly evaluating the ability of each of the plurality of nozzles to print metallic fluid test marks that are identical in appearance. ### Claim 17 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15, further comprising: repeatedly evaluating the ability of each of the plurality of nozzles to print metallic fluid test marks that are identical in appearance and ranking the nozzles according to ability. ### Claim 18 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15, wherein the first and second pluralities of test marks are printed on an erasable substrate, the erasable substrate having a glass or ceramic surface and resembling a silicon wafer. ### Claim 19 (depends on 15) The method of claim 15, further comprising: calculating a position of each of the first and second pluralities of test marks.