# US 10,371,036 B2 · System and method for monitoring particulate filter condition in an aftertreatment system > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,371,036 B2 - Document ID: US10371036B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 15/556,997 - Filed: 2016-02-16 - Published: 2018-02-22 - Granted: 2019-08-06 - Earliest claimed: 2015-03-11 - Assignees: Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. - Applicants: Cummins Emission Solutions, Inc. - Inventors: Nassim Khaled; Michael Haas - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10371036B2 ## CPC - F01N 11/002: {the diagnostic devices measuring or estimating temperature or pressure in, or downstream of the exhaust apparatus} - F01N 3/023: using means for regenerating the filters, e.g. by burning trapped particles - F01N 3/035: with catalytic reactors - F01N 3/2066: {Selective catalytic reduction [SCR]} - F01N 9/002: {of filter regeneration} - F01N 11/00: Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus - F01N 13/0093: {the purifying devices are of the same type} - F01N 2550/04: Filtering activity of particulate filters - F01N 2560/08: the means being a pressure sensor - F01N 2900/1606: Particle filter loading or soot amount - Y02T 10/12: Improving ICE efficiencies - Y02T 10/40: Engine management systems - F01N: GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES (arrangements in connection with gas exhaust of propulsion units in vehicles B60K13/00; combustion-air intake silencers specially adapted for, or arranged on, internal-combustion engines F02M35/00; protecting against, or damping, noise in general G10K11/16) - Y02T: CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION ## Abstract A system and method for monitoring filtering condition in an aftertreatment system comprises measuring a first pressure upstream of a first particulate filter in the aftertreatment system. A second pressure downstream of the first particulate filter and upstream of a second particulate filter in the aftertreatment system is measured. A third pressure downstream of the second particulate filter is also measured. A difference in pressure between the second pressure and the third pressure is determined which corresponds to a filtering condition of the first particulate filter. The difference in pressure is compared with a predetermined threshold. If the difference in pressure exceeds the predetermined threshold the failure of the first particulate filter is identified. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method for monitoring filtering condition in an aftertreatment system, comprising: measuring a first pressure difference across a first particulate filter in the aftertreatment system; measuring a second pressure difference across a second particulate filter in the aftertreatment system, the second particulate filter positioned downstream of the first particulate filter and upstream of a selective catalytic reduction system; determining a filtering condition of the first particulate filter based on the first pressure difference and the second pressure difference; measuring a third pressure downstream of the second particulate filter and upstream of the selective catalytic reduction system; in response to the first pressure difference being within a predetermined range, determining if an absolute value of the third pressure exceeds a predetermined threshold; in response to the absolute value of the third pressure exceeding the predetermined threshold, determining that the first particulate filter has failed; and generating a fault code indicating that the first particulate filter has failed. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: comparing the second pressure difference with a predetermined threshold; and when the second pressure difference exceeds the predetermined threshold, identifying a failure of the first particulate filter. ### Claim 3 (depends on 2) The method of claim 2, further comprising: providing an indication to a user of the failure of the first particulate filter. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the first pressure difference and the second pressure difference are measured using differential pressure sensors. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the first pressure difference is determined by measuring a first pressure upstream of the first particulate filter, measuring a second pressure downstream of the first particulate filter and upstream of the second particulate filter, and determining a difference between the first pressure and the second pressure. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) The method of claim 5, wherein the second pressure difference is determined by determining a difference between the second pressure and the third pressure. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: comparing at least one of the first pressure difference and the second pressure difference with a predetermined engine failure threshold; and when at least one of the first pressure difference and the second pressure difference exceeds the predetermined engine failure threshold, indicating to a user that the engine has failed. ### Claim 8 An aftertreatment system, comprising; a first particulate filter configured to receive an exhaust gas containing particulate matter and filter the exhaust gas to remove at least a portion of the particulate matter from the exhaust gas, the exhaust gas having a first pressure upstream of the first particulate filter and a second pressure downstream of the first particulate filter; and a second particulate filter positioned downstream of the first particulate filter, the second particulate filter configured to receive at least a portion of the filtered exhaust gas from the first particular filter and filter any remaining particulate matter from the exhaust gas, the exhaust gas having a third pressure downstream of the second particulate filter; a selective catalytic reduction system positioned downstream of the second particulate filter, the third pressure being upstream of the selective catalytic reduction system; and a controller configured to: determine a first pressure difference between the first pressure and the second pressure; determine a second pressure difference between the second pressure and the third pressure; in response to the first pressure difference being within a predetermined range, determining if an absolute value of the third pressure exceeds a predetermined threshold; in response to the absolute value of the third pressure exceeding the predetermined threshold, determining that the first particulate filter has failed; and generate a fault code indicating that the first particulate filter has failed. ### Claim 9 (depends on 8) The aftertreatment system of claim 8, further comprising: a first pressure sensor positioned upstream of the first particulate filter and configured to measure the first pressure; a second pressure sensor positioned downstream of the first particulate filter and upstream of the second particulate filter, the second pressure sensor configured to measure the second pressure; and a third pressure sensor positioned downstream of the second particulate filter and upstream of the selective catalytic reduction system, the third pressure sensor configured to measure the third pressure. ### Claim 10 (depends on 8) The aftertreatment system of claim 8, wherein a difference between the second pressure and the third pressure corresponds to a filtering condition of the first particulate filter. ### Claim 11 (depends on 10) The aftertreatment system of claim 10, wherein the difference between the second pressure and the third pressure exceeding a predetermined threshold corresponds to a failure of the first particulate filter. ### Claim 12 (depends on 10) The aftertreatment system of claim 10, further comprising: a first differential pressure sensor configured to measure a first pressure difference across the first particulate filter; and a second differential pressure sensor configured to measure a second pressure difference across the second particulate filter. ### Claim 13 (depends on 8) The aftertreatment system of claim 8, wherein the second particulate filter has a second cross-sectional area which is smaller than a first cross-sectional area of the first particulate filter. ### Claim 14 (depends on 8) The aftertreatment system of claim 8, wherein the second particulate filter has a second cross-sectional area which is equal to a first cross-sectional area of the first particulate filter. ### Claim 15 (depends on 8) The aftertreatment system of claim 8, wherein each of the first particulate filter and the second particulate filter are catalyzed. ### Claim 16 (depends on 9) The aftertreatment system of claim 9, wherein the controller is operatively coupled to each of the first pressure sensor, the second pressure sensor and the third pressure sensor, the controller configured to: determine a filtering condition of the first particulate filter and the second particulate filter from the first pressure difference and the second pressure difference. ### Claim 17 (depends on 16) The aftertreatment system of claim 16, wherein the controller is further configured to: determine if the second pressure difference exceeds a predetermined threshold; and when the second pressure difference exceeds the predetermined threshold, indicate to a user that the first particulate filter has failed. ### Claim 18 (depends on 12) The aftertreatment system of claim 12, wherein the controller is operatively coupled to each of the first differential pressure sensor and the second differential pressure sensor, the controller configured to: interpret the first pressure difference and the second pressure difference so as to determine a filtering condition of the first particulate filter and the second particulate filter. ### Claim 19 (depends on 18) The aftertreatment system of claim 18 wherein the controller is further configured to: determine if the second pressure difference exceeds a predetermined threshold; and when the second pressure difference exceeds the predetermined threshold, indicate to a user that the first particulate filter has failed. ### Claim 20 A method for monitoring filtering condition in an aftertreatment system, comprising: measuring a first pressure upstream of a first particulate filter of the aftertreatment system; measuring a second pressure downstream of the first particulate filter and upstream of a second particulate filter of the aftertreatment system; and measuring a third pressure downstream of the second particulate filter and upstream of a selective catalytic reduction system positioned downstream of the second particulate filter; determining if at least one of the first pressure, the second pressure, and a difference between the first pressure and the second pressure is within a predetermined range; when at least one of the first pressure, the second pressure, and a difference between the first pressure and the second pressure is within the predetermined range, determining if an absolute value of the third pressure exceeds a predetermined threshold; and in response to the absolute value of the third pressure exceeding the predetermined threshold, determining that the first particulate filter has failed; and generating a fault code indicating that the first particulate filter has failed. ### Claim 21 (depends on 20) The method of claim 20, further comprising: determining a second pressure difference between the second pressure and the third pressure; determining if the second pressure difference exceeds a predetermined threshold; and in response to the second pressure difference exceeding the predetermined threshold, indicating to a user that the first particulate filter has failed. ### Claim 22 A control circuitry for monitoring a filtering condition of an aftertreatment system, the control circuitry comprising: a controller configured to be operatively coupled to the aftertreatment system, the controller configured to: measure a first pressure upstream of a first particulate filter of the aftertreatment system; measure a second pressure downstream of the first particulate filter and upstream of a second particulate filter of the aftertreatment system; and measure a third pressure downstream of the second particulate filter and upstream of a selective catalytic reduction system positioned downstream of the second particulate filter; determine if at least one of the first pressure, the second pressure, and a difference between the first pressure and the second pressure is within a predetermined range; when at least one of the first pressure, the second pressure, and a difference between the first pressure and the second pressure is within the predetermined range, determine if an absolute value of the third pressure exceeds a predetermined threshold; and in response to the absolute value of third pressure exceeding the predetermined threshold, determine that the first particulate filter has failed; and generate a fault code indicating that the first particulate filter has failed. ### Claim 23 (depends on 22) The control circuitry of claim 22, wherein the controller is further configured to: determine a second pressure difference between the second pressure and the third pressure; determine if the second pressure difference exceeds a predetermined threshold; and in response to the second pressure difference exceeding the predetermined threshold, indicate to a user that the first particulate filter has failed.