# US 10,370,136 B1 · On-demand protective structures for packaging items in a container > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,370,136 B1 - Document ID: US10370136B1 - Status: Granted - Kind: B1 - Application number: 15/810,586 - Filed: 2017-11-13 - Granted: 2019-08-06 - Earliest claimed: 2014-12-17 - Assignees: X Development LLC - Applicants: X Development LLC - Inventors: Jeff Linnell; Matthew Bitterman; Tobias Kinnebrew - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10370136B1 ## CPC - B65B 59/02: Arrangements to enable adjustments to be made while the machine is running - B65B 5/105: {by grippers (B65B5/12 and B65B5/108 take precedence)} - B65B 5/12: Introducing successive articles, e.g. confectionery products, of different shape or size in predetermined positions - B65B 35/10: Feeding, e.g. conveying, single articles - B65B 55/00: Preserving, protecting or purifying packages or package contents in association with packaging (by packaging under special atmospheric or gaseous conditions B65B31/00; devices for placing protecting sheets, plugs, or wads over contents B65B61/22) - B65B 57/00: Automatic control, checking, warning, or safety devices (registering wrapping or container-forming material fed from rolls B65B41/18) - B65B 59/001: {Arrangements to enable adjustments related to the product to be packaged} - B65B 59/003: {Arrangements to enable adjustments related to the packaging material} - B65B 55/20: Embedding contents in shock-absorbing media, e.g. plastic foam, granular material - B65B 2210/04: Customised on demand packaging by determining a specific characteristic, e.g. shape or height, of articles or material to be packaged and selecting, creating or adapting a packaging accordingly, e.g. making a carton starting from web material - B65B 2220/14: Adding more than one type of material or article to the same package - B65B: MACHINES, APPARATUS OR DEVICES FOR, OR METHODS OF, PACKAGING ARTICLES OR MATERIALS; UNPACKING (bundling and pressing devices for cigars A24C1/44; devices for tensioning and securing binders adapted to be supported by the article or articles to be bound B25B25/00; applying closure members to bottles, jars or similar containers B67B1/00-B67B6/00; concurrent cleaning, filling and closing of bottles B67C7/00; emptying bottles, jars, cans, casks, barrels or similar containers B67C9/00) ## Abstract Example methods and systems are disclosed for on-demand packaging of one or more items. According to one example, a method can include receiving an order for the item(s) and determining characteristic-information for the item(s) using a computer system. The characteristic-information includes an indication of at least a size and a shape of the item(s). The method also includes processing the characteristic-information based on design criteria to determine an arrangement of the item(s) within at least one container volume, and a configuration for a protective structure to hold the item(s) in the arrangement within the container volume(s). The method can further include, in response to the processing the characteristic-information, forming the protective structure according to the configuration, placing the item(s) into the protective structure according to the arrangement, and placing the protective structure and the item(s) in the container volume(s). ## Claims ### Claim 1 A computer-implemented method comprising: generating, based at least on one or more characteristics of one or more items that are to be packaged, multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications that each specify: (i) one or more characteristics of a container into which the one or more items are to be packaged, (ii) one or more characteristics relating to an arrangement of the one or more items within the container, and (iii) one or more characteristics of a custom protective structure for protectively retaining the one or more items in the container according to the arrangement; selecting, based on selection criteria that include aesthetic criteria that evaluates an extent to which the one or more items, as positioned or distributed in the container, are consistent with a brand aesthetic, if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification, a particular candidate packaging specification from among the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications that each specify: (i) the one or more characteristics of the container into which the one or more items are to be packaged, (ii) the one or more characteristics relating to the arrangement of the one or more items within the container, and (iii) the one or more characteristics of the custom protective structure for protectively retaining the one or more items in the container according to the arrangement; and instructing an automated packaging manufacturing system to manufacture the custom protective structure that is specified by the selected, particular candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates an amount of material used by the protective structure. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a cost of manufacturing the protective structure. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a volume of the container. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates an amount of space within the container that is used by the one or more items if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 6 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a center of gravity or a center of mass of the container if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a likely amount of protection for the one or more items if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a likely ease of removal of the one or more items from the container if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 9 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the aesthetic criteria evaluates an extent to which one or more particular portions of the one or more items, or one or more particular portions of the custom protective structure, are immediately visible when the container or custom protective structure is first opened, if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 10 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a likely amount of damage associated with the one or more items if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 11 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, comprising packaging the one or more items in the custom protective structure, then packaging the custom protective structure into the container, using an articulated robot arm. ### Claim 12 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the automated packaging manufacturing system manufactures the custom protective structure after the particular candidate packaging specification is selected. ### Claim 13 A non-transitory computer readable storage medium encoded with a computer program, the program comprising instructions that when executed by data processing apparatus cause the data processing apparatus to perform operations comprising: generating, based at least on one or more characteristics of one or more items that are to be packaged, multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications that each specify: (i) one or more characteristics of a container into which the one or more items are to be packaged, (ii) one or more characteristics relating to an arrangement of the one or more items within the container, and (iii) one or more characteristics of a custom protective structure for protectively retaining the one or more items in the container according to the arrangement; selecting, based on selection criteria that include ease-of-removal criteria that evaluates whether a position or distribution of the one or more items in the container facilitates easy removal of the items by a recipient of the container, if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification, a particular candidate packaging specification from among the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications that each specify: (i) the one or more characteristics of the container into which the one or more items are to be packaged, (ii) the one or more characteristics relating to the arrangement of the one or more items within the container, and (iii) the one or more characteristics of the custom protective structure for protectively retaining the one or more items in the container according to the arrangement; and instructing an automated packaging manufacturing system to manufacture the custom protective structure that is specified by the selected, particular candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 14 (depends on 13) The medium of claim 13, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates an amount of material used by the protective structure. ### Claim 15 (depends on 13) The medium of claim 13, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a cost of manufacturing the protective structure. ### Claim 16 (depends on 13) The medium of claim 13, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a volume of the container. ### Claim 17 (depends on 13) The medium of claim 13, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates an amount of space within the container that is used by the one or more items if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 18 (depends on 13) The medium of claim 13, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a center of gravity or a center of mass of the container if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 19 (depends on 13) The medium of claim 13, wherein, for each of the multiple, one or more of the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications, one or more of the selection criteria evaluates a likely amount of protection for the one or more items if packaged according to the candidate packaging specification. ### Claim 20 A system comprising: one or more computers and one or more storage devices storing instructions that are operable, when executed by the one or more computers, to cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising: generating, based at least on one or more characteristics of one or more items that are to be packaged, multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications that each specify: (i) one or more characteristics of a container into which the one or more items are to be packaged, (ii) one or more characteristics relating to an arrangement of the one or more items within the container, and (iii) one or more characteristics of a custom protective structure for protectively retaining the one or more items in the container according to the arrangement; selecting, based on selection criteria that include protection criteria that evaluates feedback received from past recipients of similar items that indicates whether, if packaged similar to the candidate packaging specification, the similar items were damaged during shipment, a particular candidate packaging specification from among the multiple, different, candidate packaging specifications that each specify: (i) the one or more characteristics of the container into which the one or more items are to be packaged, (ii) the one or more characteristics relating to the arrangement of the one or more items within the container, and (iii) the one or more characteristics of the custom protective structure for protectively retaining the one or more items in the container according to the arrangement; and instructing an automated packaging manufacturing system to manufacture the custom protective structure that is specified by the selected, particular candidate packaging specification.